Paper · 2005 · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Novel Edible Coating Based on Aloe vera Gel To Maintain Table Grape Quality and Safety

Juan Miguel Valverde; Daniel Valero; Domingo Martínez-Romero; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
298
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A novel edible coating based on Aloe vera gel obtained according to SP Patent Filed 200302937 has been used as a means of preservation to maintain the quality and safety of cv. Crimson Seedless table grapes during cold storage and subsequent shelf life. Table grapes have a crucial economic value as a dessert fruit, but once harvested show a reduction of shelf life due to a rapid loss of quality. Uncoated clusters showed a rapid deterioration with an estimated shelf life period of 7 days at 1 degrees C plus 4 days at 20 degrees C, based on the fast weight loss, color changes, accelerated softening and ripening, rachis browning, and high incidence of berry decay. On the contrary, those clusters treated with A. vera gel significantly delayed the above parameters related to postharvest quality losses, and storability could be extended up to 35 days at 1 degrees C. Interestingly, this edible coating was able to reduce the initial microbial counts for both mesophillic aerobic and yeast and molds, which significantly increased in uncoated berries over storage. Moreover, the sensory analyses revealed beneficial effects in terms of delaying rachis browning and dehydration and maintenance of the visual aspect of the berry without any detrimental effect on taste, aroma, or flavors. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first time A. vera gel has been used as an edible coating in fruits, which would be an innovative and interesting means for commercial application and an alternative to the use of postharvest chemical treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uncoated grape clusters had an estimated shelf life of 7 days cold plus 4 days warm.

Taxon
Table Grapet0
Outcome
shelf life periode0
Direction
rapid deterioratione0
Value
7 days at 1 degrees C plus 4 days at 20 degrees Ce0

Verbatim

e0

“Uncoated clusters showed a rapid deterioration with an estimated shelf life period of 7 days at 1 degrees C plus 4 days at 20 degrees C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–534 · show in text ↑
t0

“Table Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aloe vera gel delayed weight loss, color change and softening in grapes.

Taxon
Table Grapet0
Treatment
A. vera gele0
Outcome
weight loss, color changes, accelerated softeninge0
Direction
delayede0
Comparator
Uncoated clusterse0

Verbatim

e0

“Uncoated clusters showed a rapid deterioration with an estimated shelf life period of 7 days at 1 degrees C plus 4 days at 20 degrees C, based on the fast weight loss, color changes, accelerated softening and ripening, rachis browning, and high incidence of berry decay. On the contrary, those clusters treated with A. vera gel significantly delayed the above parameters related to postharvest quality losses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–807 · show in text ↑
t0

“Table Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aloe vera gel delayed ripening, rachis browning and berry decay in grapes.

Taxon
Table Grapet0
Treatment
A. vera gele0
Outcome
ripening, rachis browning, and high incidence of berry decaye0
Direction
delayede0
Comparator
Uncoated clusterse0

Verbatim

e0

“Uncoated clusters showed a rapid deterioration with an estimated shelf life period of 7 days at 1 degrees C plus 4 days at 20 degrees C, based on the fast weight loss, color changes, accelerated softening and ripening, rachis browning, and high incidence of berry decay. On the contrary, those clusters treated with A. vera gel significantly delayed the above parameters related to postharvest quality losses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–807 · show in text ↑
t0

“Table Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aloe vera coating extended grape storability to 35 days at 1 degrees C.

Taxon
Table Grapet0
Treatment
A. vera gele0
Outcome
storabilitye0
Direction
extendede0
Value
35 days at 1 degrees Ce0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“those clusters treated with A. vera gel significantly delayed the above parameters related to postharvest quality losses, and storability could be extended up to 35 days at 1 degrees C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–872 · show in text ↑
t0

“Table Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aloe vera coating reduced initial mesophilic aerobic microbial counts.

Taxon
Table Grapet0
Treatment
this edible coatinge0
Interactor
mesophillic aerobic and yeast and moldse0other
Outcome
microbial counts for both mesophillic aerobic and yeast and moldse0
Direction
reducee0
Comparator
uncoated berriese0

Verbatim

e0

“this edible coating was able to reduce the initial microbial counts for both mesophillic aerobic and yeast and molds, which significantly increased in uncoated berries over storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1069 · show in text ↑
t0

“Table Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aloe vera coating delayed grape rachis browning and dehydration and preserved visual appearance.

Taxon
Table Grapet0
Outcome
rachis browning and dehydration and maintenance of the visual aspect of the berrye0
Direction
delayinge0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the sensory analyses revealed beneficial effects in terms of delaying rachis browning and dehydration and maintenance of the visual aspect of the berry without any detrimental effect on taste, aroma, or flavors.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1291 · show in text ↑
t0

“Table Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The coating had no detrimental sensory effect on grape taste, aroma or flavor.

Taxon
Table Grapet0
Outcome
taste, aroma, or flavorse0
Direction
without any detrimental effecte0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the sensory analyses revealed beneficial effects in terms of delaying rachis browning and dehydration and maintenance of the visual aspect of the berry without any detrimental effect on taste, aroma, or flavors.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1291 · show in text ↑
t0

“Table Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–67 · show in text ↑

Aloe vera · disease · VitisResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Aloe vera · quality: postharvest · VitisResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

storage · soil: biology · VitisResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.