Paper · 2011 · TURKISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY

ABA-mediated proline synthesis in cowpea leaves exposed to water deficiency and rehydration

ROBERTO CEZAR LOBO DA COSTA; ALLAN KLYNGER DA SILVA LOBATO; JOAQUIM ALBENÍSIO GOMES DA SILVEIRA; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
70
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The aim of this study was (i) to evaluate the impact of water deficit and rehydration on nitrogen compounds and abscisic acid of Vigna unguiculata leaves, and (ii) to investigate the hypothesis that abscisic acid influences proline. The experimental design was entirely randomized in a factorial design, with 2 water conditions (control and stress) and 7 evaluation periods (0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 days under water deficit, followed by the 5th and 6th day under rehydration). The leaf relative water content presented significant reduction, presenting a lower value on the 4th day of treatment under water deficit. After rehydration, the plants reestablished the leaf relative water content. The correlation analysis suggested a significant relationship between the leaf relative water content and abscisic acid. The abscisic acid concentration of the plants under water deficiency were of 2.4, 45.9, 42.6, 47.9, 66.9, 9.2, and 5.5 mg kg^{-1} DM on days 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, respectively. Rehydration quickly decreased abscisic acid. In addition, the correlation analysis indicated a significant relationship between abscisic acid and proline. The proline levels of the plants under stress showed significant increases by 67%, 354%, 423%, and 532% on the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th day, respectively, when compared with control plants. This study with Vigna unguiculata plants reveals negative consequence of water deficiency over nitrogen metabolism, and fast recovery after rehydration. The nitrogen compounds and enzymes presented direct and indirect responses in the osmotic adjustment of the plant, as well as increasing abscisic acid concentration with the intent to decrease water loss in Vigna unguiculata induced by the water deficiency. Furthermore, a positive relationship between abscisic acid and proline synthesis was confirmed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit significantly lowered leaf relative water content, lowest on day four.

Treatment
water deficite0
Outcome
leaf relative water contente0
Direction
reductione0
Qualifier
4th daye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The leaf relative water content presented significant reduction, presenting a lower value on the 4th day of treatment under water deficit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–609 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rehydration restored leaf relative water content.

Treatment
rehydratione0
Outcome
leaf relative water contente0
Direction
reestablishede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After rehydration, the plants reestablished the leaf relative water content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–686 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–40 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf relative water content was significantly related to abscisic acid.

Compound
abscisic acide0
Outcome
leaf relative water contente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The correlation analysis suggested a significant relationship between the leaf relative water content and abscisic acid.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–807 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rehydration quickly decreased abscisic acid.

Treatment
Rehydratione0
Outcome
abscisic acide0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rehydration quickly decreased abscisic acid.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1032 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–40 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Abscisic acid and proline were significantly related.

Compound
abscisic acide0
Outcome
prolinee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the correlation analysis indicated a significant relationship between abscisic acid and proline.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1142 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline increased 67% on day one of stress versus controls.

Treatment
stresse0
Outcome
proline levelse0
Direction
increasese0
Value
67%e0
Qualifier
1ste0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The proline levels of the plants under stress showed significant increases by 67%, 354%, 423%, and 532% on the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th day, respectively, when compared with control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1330 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline increased 354% on day two of stress versus controls.

Treatment
stresse0
Outcome
proline levelse0
Direction
increasese0
Value
354%e0
Qualifier
2nde0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The proline levels of the plants under stress showed significant increases by 67%, 354%, 423%, and 532% on the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th day, respectively, when compared with control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1330 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline increased 423% on day three of stress versus controls.

Treatment
stresse0
Outcome
proline levelse0
Direction
increasese0
Value
423%e0
Qualifier
3rde0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The proline levels of the plants under stress showed significant increases by 67%, 354%, 423%, and 532% on the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th day, respectively, when compared with control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1330 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline increased 532% on day four of stress versus controls.

Treatment
stresse0
Outcome
proline levelse0
Direction
increasese0
Value
532%e0
Qualifier
4the0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The proline levels of the plants under stress showed significant increases by 67%, 354%, 423%, and 532% on the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th day, respectively, when compared with control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1330 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–40 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: water · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

27 papers: 8 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.