Paper · 2013 · African Journal of Agricultural Research

Effect of blending fresh-saline water and discharge rate of drip on plant yield, water use efficiency (WUE) and quality of tomato in semi arid environment

D Nangare D; G Singh K; Kumar Satyendra

9
claims
9
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The use of alkali ground water constitutes a major threat to irrigated agriculture in semiarid parts of India. The entire arid and semiarid region in India is characterized by low rainfall and has the problems either of water scarcity or poor quality ground water and it can be better utilized for irrigation through drip irrigation system. An experiment was conducted on tomato crop at Central Institute of Post Harvest Engineering and Technology (CIPHET) Abohar, Punjab to study the effect of blending fresh and saline irrigation water on yield and quality. The good quality canal water (EC of 0.38 dS/m) and ground water (EC 19.5 dS/m) were mixed in ratio of 100% Fresh (F), 75:25 (Fresh: saline; F:S) and 50:50 (F:S). The irrigation was done through drip system with three discharge rates (1.2, 2.4 and 4.2 lph) at three irrigation levels of 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0. The plant yield decreased significantly with increase in salinity levels of irrigation water (that is, increase in proportion of saline water). The maximum plant yield (3.55 kg/plant) was recorded with fresh water irrigation while 50% saline water blending in irrigation produced the lowest yield (2.64 kg/plant). The average yield decreased significantly when the discharge rate of emitters increased from 1.2 to 2.4 lph. The quality of tomato is observed inferior in saline water treatment compared to fresh water treatment. The TSS and acidity of tomato fruits increased with increase in the saline water ratios of irrigation water. As compared to 100% fresh water treatment, the mixing of 75% fresh and 25% saline water reduced tomato yield by 11% and gave a better quality tomato fruits at the discharge rate 2.4 lph and irrigation level 0.8. Hence, saline water can be utilized through drip system for sustainable yield and quality tomato production in water scarce area having poor quality ground water. Key words: Saline water, drip irrigation, tomato, quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato yield decreased significantly as irrigation water salinity increased.

Treatment
increase in salinity levels of irrigation watere0
Outcome
plant yielde0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The plant yield decreased significantly with increase in salinity levels of irrigation water (that is, increase in proportion of saline water).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–1007 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fresh water irrigation gave the highest yield of 3.55 kg/plant.

Treatment
fresh water irrigatione0
Outcome
plant yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
3.55 kg/plante0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum plant yield (3.55 kg/plant) was recorded with fresh water irrigation while 50% saline water blending in irrigation produced the lowest yield (2.64 kg/plant).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1177 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fifty percent saline water blending gave the lowest yield of 2.64 kg/plant.

Treatment
50% saline water blending in irrigatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
loweste0
Value
2.64 kg/plante0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum plant yield (3.55 kg/plant) was recorded with fresh water irrigation while 50% saline water blending in irrigation produced the lowest yield (2.64 kg/plant).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1177 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Average tomato yield fell significantly when emitter discharge increased from 1.2 to 2.4 lph.

Treatment
2.4 lphe0
Outcome
average yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
1.2e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The average yield decreased significantly when the discharge rate of emitters increased from 1.2 to 2.4 lph.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1286 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato quality was inferior under saline irrigation compared with fresh water.

Treatment
saline water treatmente0
Outcome
quality of tomatoe0
Direction
inferiore0
Comparator
fresh water treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The quality of tomato is observed inferior in saline water treatment compared to fresh water treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1287–1390 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit TSS and acidity increased with the saline water ratio.

Organ / stage
fruitse0
Treatment
increase in the saline water ratios of irrigation watere0
Outcome
TSS and aciditye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The TSS and acidity of tomato fruits increased with increase in the saline water ratios of irrigation water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1391–1499 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75:25 fresh to saline mixture reduced tomato yield by 11% compared with fresh water.

Treatment
mixing of 75% fresh and 25% saline watere0
Outcome
tomato yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
11%e0
Comparator
100% fresh water treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As compared to 100% fresh water treatment, the mixing of 75% fresh and 25% saline water reduced tomato yield by 11% and gave a better quality tomato fruits at the discharge rate 2.4 lph and irrigation level 0.8.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1500–1711 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75:25 fresh to saline mixture improved tomato fruit quality at 2.4 lph and irrigation level 0.8.

Treatment
mixing of 75% fresh and 25% saline watere0
Outcome
quality tomato fruitse0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
discharge rate 2.4 lph and irrigation level 0.8e0
Comparator
100% fresh water treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As compared to 100% fresh water treatment, the mixing of 75% fresh and 25% saline water reduced tomato yield by 11% and gave a better quality tomato fruits at the discharge rate 2.4 lph and irrigation level 0.8.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1500–1711 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend saline water through drip irrigation for sustainable tomato yield and quality in water scarce areas.

Treatment
saline watere0
Outcome
sustainable yield and quality tomato productione0
Setting
water scarce areae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hence, saline water can be utilized through drip system for sustainable yield and quality tomato production in water scarce area having poor quality ground water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1712–1874 · show in text ↑

salinity · quality: general · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

irrigation · quality: general · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 28 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

salinity · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

160 papers: 18 positive, 142 negative or no effect

141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

156 papers more in this group

See all 160 papers →

irrigation · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

344 papers: 239 positive, 105 negative or no effect

104 papers in the same direction as this paper · 239 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

340 papers more in this group

See all 344 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.