Paper · 2001 · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research

Comparative soil water, pasture production, and crop yields in phase farming systems with lucerne and annual pasture in Western Australia

R. A. Latta; L. J. Blacklow; P. S. Cocks

18
claims
32
verbatim quotes
86
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Two field experiments in the Great Southern region of Western Australia compared the soil water content under lucerne ( Medicago sativa ) with subterranean clover ( Trifolium subterranean ) and annual medic ( Medicago polymorpha ) over a 2-year period. Lucerne depleted soil water (10–150 cm) between 40 and 100 mm at Borden and 20 and 60 mm at Pingrup compared with annual pasture. There was also less stored soil water after wheat ( Triticum aestivum ) and canola ( Brassica napus ) phases which followed the lucerne and annual pasture treatments, 30 and 48 mm after wheat, 49 and 29 mm after canola at Borden and Pingrup, respectively. Lucerne plant densities declined over 2 seasons from 35 to 25 plants/m2 (Borden) and from 56 to 42 plants/m2 (Pingrup), although it produced herbage quantities similar to or greater than clover/medic pastures. The lucerne pasture also had a reduced weed component. Wheat yield at Borden was higher after lucerne (4.7 t/ha) than after annual pasture (4.0 t/ha), whereas at Pingrup yields were similar (2 t/ha) but grain protein was higher (13.7% compared with 12.6%) . There was no yield response to applied nitrogen after lucerne or annual pasture at either site, but it increased grain protein at both sites. There was no pasture treatment effect on canola yield or oil content at Borden (2 t/ha, 46% oil). However, at Pingrup yield was higher (1.5 t/ha compared to 1.3 t/ha) and oil content was similar (41%) following lucerne–wheat. The results show that lucerne provides an opportunity to develop farming systems with greater water-use in the wheatbelt of Western Australia, and that at least 2 crops can be grown after 3 years of lucerne before soil water returns to the level found after annual pasture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lucerne depleted soil water by 40 and 100 mm at Borden relative to annual pasture.

Taxon
lucerneMedicago sativae0
Treatment
Lucernee1
Outcome
soil watere1
Direction
depletede1
Value
40 and 100 mme1
Comparator
annual pasturee1
Setting
Bordene1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared the soil water content under lucerne ( Medicago sativa )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 72–137 · show in text ↑
e1

“Lucerne depleted soil water (10–150 cm) between 40 and 100 mm at Borden and 20 and 60 mm at Pingrup compared with annual pasture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–381 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lucerne depleted soil water by 20 and 60 mm at Pingrup relative to annual pasture.

Taxon
lucerneMedicago sativae0
Treatment
Lucernee1
Outcome
soil watere1
Direction
depletede1
Value
20 and 60 mme1
Comparator
annual pasturee1
Setting
Pingrupe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared the soil water content under lucerne ( Medicago sativa )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 72–137 · show in text ↑
e1

“Lucerne depleted soil water (10–150 cm) between 40 and 100 mm at Borden and 20 and 60 mm at Pingrup compared with annual pasture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–381 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stored soil water after wheat was less following lucerne than annual pasture, by 30 and 48 mm at Borden and Pingrup respectively.

Treatment
lucernee2
Outcome
stored soil watere2
Direction
lesse2
Value
30 and 48 mme2
Qualifier
respectivelye2
Comparator
annual pasture treatmentse2
Setting
Borden and Pingrupe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“There was also less stored soil water after wheat ( Triticum aestivum ) and canola ( Brassica napus ) phases which followed the lucerne and annual pasture treatments, 30 and 48 mm after wheat, 49 and 29 mm after canola at Borden and Pingrup, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–637 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stored soil water after canola was less following lucerne than annual pasture, by 49 and 29 mm at Borden and Pingrup respectively.

Treatment
lucernee2
Outcome
stored soil watere2
Direction
lesse2
Value
49 and 29 mme2
Qualifier
respectivelye2
Comparator
annual pasture treatmentse2
Setting
Borden and Pingrupe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“There was also less stored soil water after wheat ( Triticum aestivum ) and canola ( Brassica napus ) phases which followed the lucerne and annual pasture treatments, 30 and 48 mm after wheat, 49 and 29 mm after canola at Borden and Pingrup, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–637 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lucerne plant density declined from 35 to 25 plants/m2 over 2 seasons at Borden.

Taxon
lucerneMedicago sativae0
Outcome
plant densitiese3
Direction
declinede3
Value
35 to 25 plants/m2e3
Qualifier
over 2 seasonse3
Setting
Bordene3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared the soil water content under lucerne ( Medicago sativa )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 72–137 · show in text ↑
e3

“Lucerne plant densities declined over 2 seasons from 35 to 25 plants/m2 (Borden) and from 56 to 42 plants/m2 (Pingrup)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–757 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lucerne plant density declined from 56 to 42 plants/m2 over 2 seasons at Pingrup.

Taxon
lucerneMedicago sativae0
Outcome
plant densitiese3
Direction
declinede3
Value
56 to 42 plants/m2e3
Qualifier
over 2 seasonse3
Setting
Pingrupe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared the soil water content under lucerne ( Medicago sativa )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 72–137 · show in text ↑
e3

“Lucerne plant densities declined over 2 seasons from 35 to 25 plants/m2 (Borden) and from 56 to 42 plants/m2 (Pingrup)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–757 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lucerne produced herbage quantities similar to or greater than clover/medic pastures.

Taxon
lucerneMedicago sativae0
Treatment
lucernee0
Outcome
herbage quantitiese4
Direction
similar to or greater thane4
Comparator
clover/medic pasturese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared the soil water content under lucerne ( Medicago sativa )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 72–137 · show in text ↑
e4

“although it produced herbage quantities similar to or greater than clover/medic pastures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–847 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lucerne pasture had a reduced weed component.

Taxon
lucerneMedicago sativae0
Treatment
lucerne pasturee5
Outcome
weed componente5
Direction
reducede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared the soil water content under lucerne ( Medicago sativa )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 72–137 · show in text ↑
e5

“The lucerne pasture also had a reduced weed component”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–902 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield at Borden was higher after lucerne (4.7 t/ha) than after annual pasture (4.0 t/ha).

Treatment
lucernee6
Outcome
Wheat yielde6
Direction
highere6
Value
4.7 t/hae6
Qualifier
4.0 t/hae6
Comparator
annual pasturee6
Setting
Bordene6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Wheat yield at Borden was higher after lucerne (4.7 t/ha) than after annual pasture (4.0 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–998 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield at Pingrup was similar to yield after annual pasture (2 t/ha).

Treatment
lucernee6
Outcome
yieldse7
Direction
similare7
Value
2 t/hae7
Setting
Pingrupe7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Wheat yield at Borden was higher after lucerne (4.7 t/ha) than after annual pasture (4.0 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–998 · show in text ↑
e7

“whereas at Pingrup yields were similar (2 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1047 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain protein of wheat at Pingrup was higher after lucerne (13.7%) than after the comparator (12.6%).

Treatment
lucernee6
Outcome
grain proteine5
Direction
highere5
Value
13.7%e5
Qualifier
12.6%e5
Setting
Pingrupe7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Wheat yield at Borden was higher after lucerne (4.7 t/ha) than after annual pasture (4.0 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–998 · show in text ↑
e7

“whereas at Pingrup yields were similar (2 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1047 · show in text ↑
e5

“but grain protein was higher (13.7% compared with 12.6%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied nitrogen did not change wheat yield after lucerne or annual pasture at either site.

Treatment
applied nitrogene5
Outcome
yielde5
Direction
no yield responsee5
Comparator
after lucerne or annual pasturee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Wheat yield at Borden was higher after lucerne (4.7 t/ha) than after annual pasture (4.0 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–998 · show in text ↑
e5

“There was no yield response to applied nitrogen after lucerne or annual pasture at either site, but it increased grain protein at both sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1247 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied nitrogen increased wheat grain protein at both sites.

Treatment
applied nitrogene5
Outcome
grain proteine5
Direction
increasede5
Setting
both sitese5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Wheat yield at Borden was higher after lucerne (4.7 t/ha) than after annual pasture (4.0 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–998 · show in text ↑
e5

“There was no yield response to applied nitrogen after lucerne or annual pasture at either site, but it increased grain protein at both sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1247 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canola yield at Borden showed no pasture treatment effect (2 t/ha).

Treatment
pasture treatmente0
Outcome
canola yielde0
Direction
no pasture treatment effecte0
Value
2 t/hae0
Setting
Bordene0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no pasture treatment effect on canola yield or oil content at Borden (2 t/ha, 46% oil)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1345 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canola oil content at Borden showed no pasture treatment effect (46%).

Treatment
pasture treatmente0
Outcome
oil contente0
Direction
no pasture treatment effecte0
Value
46%e0
Setting
Bordene0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no pasture treatment effect on canola yield or oil content at Borden (2 t/ha, 46% oil)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1345 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canola yield at Pingrup was higher after lucerne (1.5 t/ha) than at 1.3 t/ha.

Treatment
lucernee1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
1.5 t/hae1
Qualifier
1.3 t/hae1
Setting
Pingrupe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no pasture treatment effect on canola yield or oil content at Borden (2 t/ha, 46% oil)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1345 · show in text ↑
e1

“However, at Pingrup yield was higher (1.5 t/ha compared to 1.3 t/ha) and oil content was similar (41%) following lucerne–wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1473 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canola oil content at Pingrup was similar after lucerne-wheat (41%).

Treatment
lucernee1
Outcome
oil contente1
Direction
similare1
Value
41%e1
Setting
Pingrupe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no pasture treatment effect on canola yield or oil content at Borden (2 t/ha, 46% oil)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1345 · show in text ↑
e1

“However, at Pingrup yield was higher (1.5 t/ha compared to 1.3 t/ha) and oil content was similar (41%) following lucerne–wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1473 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

At least 2 crops can be grown after 3 years of lucerne before soil water returns to the level after annual pasture.

Taxon
lucerneMedicago sativae0
Outcome
at least 2 crops can be grown after 3 years of lucernee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared the soil water content under lucerne ( Medicago sativa )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 72–137 · show in text ↑
e2

“and that at least 2 crops can be grown after 3 years of lucerne before soil water returns to the level found after annual pasture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1618–1747 · show in text ↑

Medicago sativa · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Medicago sativa · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 27 positive, 11 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

Medicago sativa · quality: oil · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Medicago sativa · soil: physics · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Medicago sativa · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

nitrogen · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

454 papers: 400 positive, 54 negative or no effect

399 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

450 papers more in this group

See all 454 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

323 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,737 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.