Paper · 1984 · Canadian Journal of Botany

Spore germination, penetration, and root colonization of six species of vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on soybean

Marjan Van Nuffelen; N. C. Schenck

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
33
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Six species of vesicular–arbuscular (VA) mycorrhizal fungi, each at 500 spores per kilogram of pasteurized soil, were compared for spore germination, hyphal root penetration, and root colonization on soybean in a repeated greenhouse experiment. Generally, the six species were categorized into two groups. Those species in group I (Glomus mosseae, Gl. intraradices, and Gigaspora heterogama) had higher spore germination, root penetration, percentage root colonization values, and fungal growth rates in the roots than those species in group II (Gl. etunicatum, Gi. margarita, and Entrophospora sp.). However, when we calculated the fungal growth rate (centimetres per day) per penetration point or used Smith and Walker's equation, the highest values were assigned to group II. Fungal growth rate per penetration point was inversely proportional to the number of penetration points, indicating growth "interference" among hyphae originating from different penetration points in the root. The number of penetration points was correlated significantly with root length but not with percentage of root colonization. Dry root weight was significantly correlated with length of colonized roots in both experiments, while shoot weight was correlated with colonized root length in only one of the two experiments. Glomus mosseae was the only species which induced a significant increase both in dry shoot weight and numbers of Rhizobium nodules as compared with those for nonmycorrhizal plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Those species in group I (Glomus mosseae, Gl. intraradices, and Gigaspora heterogama) had higher spore germination, root penetration, percentage root colonization values, and fungal growth rates in the roots than those species in group II (Gl. etunicatum, Gi. margarita, and Entrophospora sp.).

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
spore germination, root penetration, percentage root colonization valuese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
group IIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Those species in group I (Glomus mosseae, Gl. intraradices, and Gigaspora heterogama) had higher spore germination, root penetration, percentage root colonization values, and fungal growth rates in the roots than those species in group II (Gl. etunicatum, Gi. margarita, and Entrophospora sp.).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 306–600 · show in text ↑
t0

“on soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–121 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Those species in group I (Glomus mosseae, Gl. intraradices, and Gigaspora heterogama) had higher spore germination, root penetration, percentage root colonization values, and fungal growth rates in the roots than those species in group II (Gl. etunicatum, Gi. margarita, and Entrophospora sp.).

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
fungal growth rates in the rootse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
group IIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Those species in group I (Glomus mosseae, Gl. intraradices, and Gigaspora heterogama) had higher spore germination, root penetration, percentage root colonization values, and fungal growth rates in the roots than those species in group II (Gl. etunicatum, Gi. margarita, and Entrophospora sp.).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 306–600 · show in text ↑
t0

“on soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–121 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

However, when we calculated the fungal growth rate (centimetres per day) per penetration point or used Smith and Walker's equation, the highest values were assigned to group II.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
group IIe0
Outcome
fungal growth ratee0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, when we calculated the fungal growth rate (centimetres per day) per penetration point or used Smith and Walker's equation, the highest values were assigned to group II.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–778 · show in text ↑
t0

“on soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–121 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungal growth rate per penetration point was inversely proportional to the number of penetration points, indicating growth "interference" among hyphae originating from different penetration points in the root.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Organ / stage
roote0
Outcome
Fungal growth rate per penetration pointe0
Direction
inversely proportionale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fungal growth rate per penetration point was inversely proportional to the number of penetration points, indicating growth "interference" among hyphae originating from different penetration points in the root.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–988 · show in text ↑
t0

“on soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–121 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The number of penetration points was correlated significantly with root length but not with percentage of root colonization.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Organ / stage
root lengthe0
Outcome
number of penetration pointse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number of penetration points was correlated significantly with root length but not with percentage of root colonization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1113 · show in text ↑
t0

“on soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–121 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The number of penetration points was correlated significantly with root length but not with percentage of root colonization.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Organ / stage
root colonizatione0
Outcome
number of penetration pointse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number of penetration points was correlated significantly with root length but not with percentage of root colonization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1113 · show in text ↑
t0

“on soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–121 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry root weight was significantly correlated with length of colonized roots in both experiments, while shoot weight was correlated with colonized root length in only one of the two experiments.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Organ / stage
colonized rootse0
Outcome
Dry root weighte0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry root weight was significantly correlated with length of colonized roots in both experiments, while shoot weight was correlated with colonized root length in only one of the two experiments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1307 · show in text ↑
t0

“on soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–121 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry root weight was significantly correlated with length of colonized roots in both experiments, while shoot weight was correlated with colonized root length in only one of the two experiments.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Organ / stage
colonized roote0
Outcome
shoot weighte0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry root weight was significantly correlated with length of colonized roots in both experiments, while shoot weight was correlated with colonized root length in only one of the two experiments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1307 · show in text ↑
t0

“on soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus mosseae was the only species which induced a significant increase both in dry shoot weight and numbers of Rhizobium nodules as compared with those for nonmycorrhizal plants.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
Glomus mosseaee0
Interactor
Glomus mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
dry shoot weighte0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
nonmycorrhizal plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glomus mosseae was the only species which induced a significant increase both in dry shoot weight and numbers of Rhizobium nodules as compared with those for nonmycorrhizal plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1488 · show in text ↑
t0

“on soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus mosseae was the only species which induced a significant increase both in dry shoot weight and numbers of Rhizobium nodules as compared with those for nonmycorrhizal plants.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
Glomus mosseaee0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Second interactor
Glomus mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
numbers of Rhizobium nodulese0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
nonmycorrhizal plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glomus mosseae was the only species which induced a significant increase both in dry shoot weight and numbers of Rhizobium nodules as compared with those for nonmycorrhizal plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1488 · show in text ↑
t0

“on soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–121 · show in text ↑

Funneliformis mosseae · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.