Paper · 2010 · Pure and Applied Chemistry

Auxin-producing Bacillus sp.: Auxin quantification and effect on the growth of Solanum tuberosum

Ambreen Ahmed; Shahida Hasnain

8
claims
19
verbatim quotes
135
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Plant-associated bacteria are known to improve plant growth and play a major role in the development of plants. The present study is concerned with the isolation of two auxin-producing plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB). On the basis of 16S rRNA sequencing, both of the strains are identified as Bacillus sp. Maximum auxin production was observed at 37 °C after 48 h of incubation. Increase in tryptophan concentration stimulated auxin production by the isolates. High-performance liquid chromatography analysis showed that the bacterial auxin exhibited similar retention time as the standard indole-3-acetic acid (IAA). Sprouts of Solanum tuberosum var. Desiree were inoculated with the isolates. Comparison of various growth parameters of inoculated plants with non-inoculated plants revealed the improvement of plant growth by bacterial inoculation. Almost 40 and 35 % increase in shoot length with P4 and S6 inoculation, respectively, was observed. Considerable improvement in root growth was observed with an increase in the number and length of roots. On the basis of the above findings, it is concluded that the plant growth-promoting Bacillus strains affect S. tuberosum beneficially, resulting in improved plant growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On the basis of 16S rRNA sequencing, both auxin-producing isolates were identified as Bacillus sp.

Taxon
Bacillus sp.e0
Outcome
identified as Bacillus sp.e0

Verbatim

e0

“On the basis of 16S rRNA sequencing, both of the strains are identified as Bacillus sp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–312 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum auxin production by the Bacillus isolates was observed at 37 °C after 48 h of incubation.

Taxon
Bacillus sp.t0
Outcome
Maximum auxin productione0
Qualifier
37 °C after 48 h of incubatione0

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum auxin production was observed at 37 °C after 48 h of incubation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–384 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bacillus sp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased tryptophan concentration stimulated auxin production by the Bacillus isolates.

Taxon
Bacillus sp.t0
Treatment
Increase in tryptophan concentratione0
Outcome
auxin productione0
Direction
stimulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Increase in tryptophan concentration stimulated auxin production by the isolates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–466 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bacillus sp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–28 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The bacterial auxin showed a retention time in HPLC similar to that of standard indole-3-acetic acid (IAA).

Taxon
Bacillus sp.t0
Outcome
retention timee0
Comparator
standard indole-3-acetic acid (IAA)e0

Verbatim

e0

“the bacterial auxin exhibited similar retention time as the standard indole-3-acetic acid (IAA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–623 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bacillus sp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated potato plants showed improved plant growth compared with non-inoculated plants.

Taxon
Solanum tuberosumSolanum tuberosume0
Material
Desireee0
Treatment
bacterial inoculatione1
Interactor
Bacillus sp.t0symbiont
Outcome
plant growthe1
Direction
improvemente1
Comparator
non-inoculated plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sprouts of Solanum tuberosum var. Desiree were inoculated with the isolates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–700 · show in text ↑
e1

“Comparison of various growth parameters of inoculated plants with non-inoculated plants revealed the improvement of plant growth by bacterial inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–855 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bacillus sp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with isolate P4 increased shoot length of Solanum tuberosum by about 40 %.

Taxon
Solanum tuberosumSolanum tuberosume1
Treatment
P4e0
Interactor
Bacillus sp.t0symbiont
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
Almost 40e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Almost 40 and 35 % increase in shoot length with P4 and S6 inoculation, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–941 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sprouts of Solanum tuberosum var. Desiree were inoculated with the isolates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–700 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bacillus sp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with isolate S6 increased shoot length of Solanum tuberosum by about 35 %.

Taxon
Solanum tuberosumSolanum tuberosume1
Treatment
S6 inoculatione0
Interactor
Bacillus sp.t0symbiont
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
35 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Almost 40 and 35 % increase in shoot length with P4 and S6 inoculation, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–941 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sprouts of Solanum tuberosum var. Desiree were inoculated with the isolates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–700 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bacillus sp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculation improved root growth of Solanum tuberosum, with an increase in the number and length of roots.

Taxon
Solanum tuberosumSolanum tuberosume1
Treatment
inoculated with the isolatese1
Interactor
Bacillus sp.t0symbiont
Outcome
number and length of rootse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Considerable improvement in root growth was observed with an increase in the number and length of roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1060 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sprouts of Solanum tuberosum var. Desiree were inoculated with the isolates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–700 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bacillus sp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–28 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

104 papers: 82 positive, 22 negative or no effect

81 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

100 papers more in this group

See all 104 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.