Paper · 1978 · New Phytologist

GROWTH OF SUBTERRANEAN CLOVER IN RELATION TO THE FORMATION OF ENDOMYCORRHIZAS BY INTRODUCED AND INDIGENOUS FUNGI IN A FIELD SOIL

L. K. ABBOTT; A. D. ROBSON

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
135
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY Three vesicular arbuscular (VA) endophytes differed in their ability to increase the growth of subterranean clover when introduced into a freshly collected field soil. Four indigenous endophytes infected the roots in both the control and inoculated treatments. Two of the introduced endophytes, isolates of Glomus monosporus , differed in their ability to increase growth and phosphorus content of subterranean clover. These endophytes were both superior to the third introduced endophyte, G. fasciculatus. Differences in the growth of subterranean clover when limited by phosphorus supply were related to the rate of mycorrhiza development. Inoculation of soil with the three introduced endophytes did not reduce initial infection by the four indigenous endophytes. Mycorrhizas formed by G. monosporus and G. fasciculatus were distinguished from those formed by indigenous endophytes on the basis of morphology. Plants inoculated with isolates of G. monosporus had a greater proportion of their dry weight and phosphorus content in the tops than plants inoculated with G. fasciculatus or the control plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three introduced VA endophytes differed in their ability to increase clover growth.

Taxon
subterranean cloverTrifolium subterraneume0
Treatment
introduced into a freshly collected field soile0
Interactor
vesicular arbuscular (VA) endophytese0symbiont
Outcome
growth of subterranean clovere0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium subterraneum
Trifolium subterraneum · TaxonKevin Thiele from Perth, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three vesicular arbuscular (VA) endophytes differed in their ability to increase the growth of subterranean clover when introduced into a freshly collected field soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–175 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four indigenous endophytes infected roots in control and inoculated clover.

Taxon
SUBTERRANEAN CLOVERTrifolium subterraneumt0
Interactor
indigenous endophytese0symbiont
Outcome
infected the rootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium subterraneum
Trifolium subterraneum · TaxonKevin Thiele from Perth, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four indigenous endophytes infected the roots in both the control and inoculated treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 176–268 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUBTERRANEAN CLOVER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two Glomus monosporus isolates differed in their ability to increase clover growth and phosphorus content.

Taxon
subterranean cloverTrifolium subterraneume0
Treatment
isolates of Glomus monosporuse0
Interactor
Glomus monosporuse0symbiont
Outcome
growth and phosphorus contente0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium subterraneum
Trifolium subterraneum · TaxonKevin Thiele from Perth, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two of the introduced endophytes, isolates of Glomus monosporus , differed in their ability to increase growth and phosphorus content of subterranean clover.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–426 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Glomus monosporus isolates outperformed G. fasciculatus.

Taxon
SUBTERRANEAN CLOVERTrifolium subterraneumt0
Treatment
isolates of Glomus monosporuse1
Interactor
Glomus monosporuse1symbiont
Outcome
superiore0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
G. fasciculatuse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium subterraneum
Trifolium subterraneum · TaxonKevin Thiele from Perth, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These endophytes were both superior to the third introduced endophyte, G. fasciculatus.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–514 · show in text ↑
e1

“isolates of Glomus monosporus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 303–332 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUBTERRANEAN CLOVER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–29 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth differences under phosphorus limitation were related to mycorrhiza development rate.

Taxon
subterranean cloverTrifolium subterraneume0
Interactor
mycorrhizae0symbiont
Outcome
Differences in the growthe0
Qualifier
limited by phosphorus supplye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium subterraneum
Trifolium subterraneum · TaxonKevin Thiele from Perth, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Differences in the growth of subterranean clover when limited by phosphorus supply were related to the rate of mycorrhiza development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–649 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Introducing three endophytes did not reduce initial infection by indigenous endophytes.

Taxon
SUBTERRANEAN CLOVERTrifolium subterraneumt0
Treatment
Inoculation of soil with the three introduced endophytese0
Interactor
indigenous endophytese0symbiont
Outcome
initial infection by the four indigenous endophytese0
Direction
did not reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium subterraneum
Trifolium subterraneum · TaxonKevin Thiele from Perth, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation of soil with the three introduced endophytes did not reduce initial infection by the four indigenous endophytes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–774 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUBTERRANEAN CLOVER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–29 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Morphology distinguished mycorrhizas of introduced Glomus species from those of indigenous endophytes.

Taxon
SUBTERRANEAN CLOVERTrifolium subterraneumt0
Interactor
G. monosporuse0symbiont
Outcome
distinguished from those formed by indigenous endophytes on the basis of morphologye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium subterraneum
Trifolium subterraneum · TaxonKevin Thiele from Perth, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mycorrhizas formed by G. monosporus and G. fasciculatus were distinguished from those formed by indigenous endophytes on the basis of morphology.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUBTERRANEAN CLOVER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G. monosporus inoculation increased the proportion of clover dry weight in tops versus G. fasciculatus and control.

Taxon
SUBTERRANEAN CLOVERTrifolium subterraneumt0
Organ / stage
topse0
Treatment
inoculated with isolates of G. monosporuse0
Interactor
G. monosporuse0symbiont
Outcome
proportion of their dry weighte0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
plants inoculated with G. fasciculatus or the control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium subterraneum
Trifolium subterraneum · TaxonKevin Thiele from Perth, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants inoculated with isolates of G. monosporus had a greater proportion of their dry weight and phosphorus content in the tops than plants inoculated with G. fasciculatus or the control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1116 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUBTERRANEAN CLOVER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G. monosporus inoculation increased the proportion of clover phosphorus in tops versus G. fasciculatus and control.

Taxon
SUBTERRANEAN CLOVERTrifolium subterraneumt0
Organ / stage
topse0
Treatment
inoculated with isolates of G. monosporuse0
Interactor
G. monosporuse0symbiont
Outcome
phosphorus content in the topse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
plants inoculated with G. fasciculatus or the control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium subterraneum
Trifolium subterraneum · TaxonKevin Thiele from Perth, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants inoculated with isolates of G. monosporus had a greater proportion of their dry weight and phosphorus content in the tops than plants inoculated with G. fasciculatus or the control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1116 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUBTERRANEAN CLOVER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–29 · show in text ↑

Glomus · growth · Trifolium subterraneumResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · growth · Trifolium subterraneumPositive and negative results

14 papers: 9 positive, 5 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Trifolium subterraneumResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.