Abstract
Abstract Field studies were conducted from 1987 to 1996 to evaluate the effects of long-term no-tillage, reduced-tillage, or full-tillage systems on peanut grade, yield, and stem rot (Sclerotium rolfsii) disease development. In 3 of 10 yr the full-tillage system outyielded the no-tillage system while the reduced tillage system resulted in yield increase over no-tillage systems in 2 yr. Reduced-tillage plots had a higher incidence of stem rot than full-or no-tillage in 4 of 10 yr. In 3 of 10 yr, peanut grade (% TSMK) was lower in no-tillage than full-tillage plots. The reduced tillage system has shown promise for use in Texas for peanut. However, no-tillage peanut systems have never produced yield and quality comparable to full-tillage systems.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Full tillage outyielded no tillage for peanut in 3 of 10 years.
- Taxon
- peanut
Arachis hypogaeae1 - Treatment
- full-tillage systeme0
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Direction
- outyieldede0
- Value
- 3 of 10 yre0
- Comparator
- no-tillage systeme0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In 3 of 10 yr the full-tillage system outyielded the no-tillage system”
e1“peanut grade, yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Reduced tillage increased peanut yield over no tillage in 2 years.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae1
- Treatment
- reduced tillage systeme0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 2 yre0
- Comparator
- no-tillage systemse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the reduced tillage system resulted in yield increase over no-tillage systems in 2 yr”
e1“peanut grade, yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Reduced tillage had higher peanut stem rot incidence than full or no tillage in 4 of 10 years.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae1
- Treatment
- Reduced-tillagee0
- Interactor
- Sclerotium rolfsii
Agroathelia rolfsiie1pathogen - Outcome
- incidence of stem rote0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 4 of 10 yre0
- Comparator
- full-or no-tillagee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Reduced-tillage plots had a higher incidence of stem rot than full-or no-tillage in 4 of 10 yr”
e1“peanut grade, yield, and stem rot (Sclerotium rolfsii)”
Claim · model-written summary
No tillage lowered peanut grade relative to full tillage in 3 of 10 years.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- no-tillagee0
- Outcome
- peanut grade (% TSMK)e0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Value
- 3 of 10 yre0
- Comparator
- full-tillagee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In 3 of 10 yr, peanut grade (% TSMK) was lower in no-tillage than full-tillage plots”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors consider reduced tillage promising for Texas peanut production.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- reduced tillage systeme0
- Outcome
- promise for usee0
- Setting
- Texase0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The reduced tillage system has shown promise for use in Texas for peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors conclude no tillage has not achieved peanut yield and quality comparable to full tillage.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- no-tillagee0
- Outcome
- yield and qualitye0
- Direction
- never producede0
- Comparator
- full-tillage systemse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“no-tillage peanut systems have never produced yield and quality comparable to full-tillage systems”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ
65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
86 papers more in this group
See all 90 papers →tillage · organism · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- no effect
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →tillage · Agroathelia rolfsii · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.