Paper · 2012 · Journal of Agricultural Economics

Yield Effects of Tissue Culture Bananas in Kenya: Accounting for Selection Bias and the Role of Complementary Inputs

Nassul S. Kabunga; Thomas Dubois; Matin Qaim

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
104
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract We analyse yield effects of tissue culture (TC) banana technology in the Kenyan small farm sector, using recent survey data and an endogenous switching regression approach. TC banana plantlets, which are free from pests and diseases, have been introduced in East Africa since the late 1990s. Although field experiments show significant yield advantages over traditional banana suckers, a rigorous assessment of impacts in farmers’ fields is still outstanding. A comparison of mean yield levels between TC adopters and non‐adopters in our sample shows no significant difference. However, we find evidence of negative selection bias, indicating that farmers with lower than average yields are more likely to adopt TC. Controlling for this bias results in a positive and significant TC net yield gain of 7%. We also find that TC technology is more knowledge intensive and more responsive to irrigation than traditional bananas. Simulations show that improving access to irrigation could lift TC productivity gains to above 20%. The analytical approach developed and applied here and the finding of negative selection bias may also be relevant for the evaluation of other agricultural technologies.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean banana yields did not differ significantly between tissue-culture adopters and non-adopters.

Taxon
Bananast0
Outcome
mean yield levelse0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
non‐adopterse0

Verbatim

e0

“A comparison of mean yield levels between TC adopters and non‐adopters in our sample shows no significant difference.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–586 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bananas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–39 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmers with below-average yields were more likely to adopt tissue-culture bananas, indicating negative selection bias.

Taxon
Bananast0
Outcome
adopt TCe0
Direction
more likelye0
Comparator
lower than average yieldse0

Verbatim

e0

“we find evidence of negative selection bias, indicating that farmers with lower than average yields are more likely to adopt TC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–724 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bananas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–39 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

After selection adjustment, tissue-culture bananas had a significant 7% net yield gain.

Taxon
Bananast0
Treatment
TCe0
Outcome
TC net yield gaine0
Direction
positivee0
Value
7%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Controlling for this bias results in a positive and significant TC net yield gain of 7%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–813 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bananas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–39 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tissue-culture banana technology was more knowledge intensive than traditional bananas.

Taxon
Bananast0
Outcome
knowledge intensivee0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
traditional bananase0

Verbatim

e0

“TC technology is more knowledge intensive and more responsive to irrigation than traditional bananas.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–933 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bananas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–39 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tissue-culture banana technology responded more to irrigation than traditional bananas.

Taxon
Bananast0
Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
responsive to irrigatione0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
traditional bananase0

Verbatim

e0

“TC technology is more knowledge intensive and more responsive to irrigation than traditional bananas.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–933 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bananas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated improved irrigation access raised tissue-culture banana productivity gains above 20%.

Taxon
Bananast0
Treatment
improving access to irrigatione0
Outcome
TC productivity gainse0
Direction
lifte0
Value
above 20%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Simulations show that improving access to irrigation could lift TC productivity gains to above 20%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1033 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bananas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–39 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · MusaResults differ

76 papers: 67 positive, 9 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.