Abstract
Phenamiphos applied at 6.7 kg ai/ha through a solid set or a center pivot irrigation system with 28 mm of water effectively controlled root-knot nematodes, Meloidogyne incognita, and resulted in greater snap bean growth and yields irrespective of growing season, tillage method, or cover crop system. The percentage yield increases attributed to this method of M. incognita control over nontreated controls were 45% in the spring crop, and 90% and 409% in the fall crops following winter rye and fallow, respectively. Root galling was not affected by tillage systems or cover crop, but disk tillage resulted in over 50% reduction in bean yield compared with yields from the subsoil-bed tillage system.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Phenamiphos effectively controlled root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne incognita).
- Taxon
- Snap Beant0
- Treatment
- Phenamiphos applied at 6.7 kg ai/hae1
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognita
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=60)
Meloidogyne incognitae1pest - Outcome
- root-knot nematodese1
- Direction
- effectively controllede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Snap Bean”
e1“Phenamiphos applied at 6.7 kg ai/ha through a solid set or a center pivot irrigation system with 28 mm of water effectively controlled root-knot nematodes, Meloidogyne incognita”
Claim · model-written summary
Phenamiphos resulted in greater snap bean growth and yields than nontreated controls, irrespective of season, tillage or cover crop.
Verbatim
t0“Snap Bean”
e2“resulted in greater snap bean growth and yields irrespective of growing season, tillage method, or cover crop system”
e3“The percentage yield increases attributed to this method of M. incognita control over nontreated controls were 45% in the spring crop, and 90% and 409% in the fall crops following winter rye and fallow, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Phenamiphos control raised bean yield by 45% in the spring crop over nontreated controls.
Verbatim
t0“Snap Bean”
e3“The percentage yield increases attributed to this method of M. incognita control over nontreated controls were 45% in the spring crop, and 90% and 409% in the fall crops following winter rye and fallow, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Phenamiphos control raised bean yield by 90% in the fall crop following winter rye over nontreated controls.
Verbatim
t0“Snap Bean”
e3“The percentage yield increases attributed to this method of M. incognita control over nontreated controls were 45% in the spring crop, and 90% and 409% in the fall crops following winter rye and fallow, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Phenamiphos control raised bean yield by 409% in the fall crop following fallow over nontreated controls.
Verbatim
t0“Snap Bean”
e3“The percentage yield increases attributed to this method of M. incognita control over nontreated controls were 45% in the spring crop, and 90% and 409% in the fall crops following winter rye and fallow, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Root galling was not affected by tillage systems or cover crop.
- Taxon
- Snap Beant0
- Treatment
- tillage systems or cover crope4
- Outcome
- Root gallinge4
- Direction
- not affectede4
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Snap Bean”
e4“Root galling was not affected by tillage systems or cover crop”
Claim · model-written summary
Disk tillage reduced bean yield by over 50% compared with the subsoil-bed tillage system.
Verbatim
t0“Snap Bean”
e5“disk tillage resulted in over 50% reduction in bean yield compared with yields from the subsoil-bed tillage system”
The same questions in other papers
fenamiphos · Meloidogyne incognita · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
cover crop · pest · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
tillage · pest · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →tillage · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
60 papers more in this group
See all 64 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.