Paper · 2011 · Australian Journal of Crop Science

Critical period of weed control in soybean (Glycine max) as influenced by starter fertilizer.

Ghadir Mohammadi; F. Amiri

8
claims
12
verbatim quotes
29
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The critical period of weed control (CPWC) in crops depends on many factors including supply and availability of nutrients. In order to investigate the effect of starter fertilizer on the CPWC in soybean a field experiment in a randomized complete block design with four replications in a factorial arrangement was conducted at the Agricultural Research Farm of Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran. Two factors were examined: the first factor was the starter fertilizer levels (0 and 25 kg ha -1 ) applied in the form of monoammonium phosphate and the second factor was the different weed interference periods. Results indicated that soybean seed yield and yield components were significantly decreased when the weed interference period was increased. Weedy condition for the entire growing season reduced seed yield by 36% as compared with full season weed free condition. In order to prevent > 5% seed yield loss soybean field must be kept weed-free from the V1 to R1 (9-47 days after crop emergence (DAE) or 111.20 to 743.05 accumulated thermal units (ATU) and between the V7 and R3 (26-52 DAE or 374.55 to 832.75 ATU) at 0 and 25 kg.ha -1 of starter fertilizer level, respectively. Generally, the use of starter fertilizer slightly delayed the end of the CPWC (by 5 days), but this condition shortened the CPWC by 12 days because of the later beginning of the CPWC (by 17 days). Practical implication of this finding is that application of monoammonium phosphate as starter fertilizer can reduce the time needed for weed control in soybean field and consequently lead to less herbicide application and cultivation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean seed yield and yield components decreased significantly as the weed interference period increased.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
weed interference period was increasede0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
seed yield and yield componentse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soybean seed yield and yield components were significantly decreased when the weed interference period was increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–748 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weedy condition for the entire growing season reduced soybean seed yield by 36% compared with the full-season weed-free condition.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
Weedy condition for the entire growing seasone0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
36%e0
Comparator
full season weed free conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–42 · show in text ↑
e0

“Weedy condition for the entire growing season reduced seed yield by 36% as compared with full season weed free condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–870 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

To prevent more than 5% seed yield loss, soybean should be kept weed-free from V1 to R1 (9-47 DAE) at the 0 kg/ha starter fertilizer level.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome
kept weed-freee0
Value
V1 to R1e0
Qualifier
9-47 days after crop emergence (DAE) or 111.20 to 743.05 accumulated thermal units (ATU)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soybean field must be kept weed-free from the V1 to R1 (9-47 days after crop emergence (DAE) or 111.20 to 743.05 accumulated thermal units (ATU) and between the V7 and R3 (26-52 DAE or 374.55 to 832.75 ATU) at 0 and 25 kg.ha -1 of starter fertilizer level, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1182 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

To prevent more than 5% seed yield loss, soybean should be kept weed-free from V7 to R3 (26-52 DAE) at the 25 kg/ha starter fertilizer level.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome
kept weed-freee0
Value
V7 and R3e0
Qualifier
26-52 DAE or 374.55 to 832.75 ATUe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soybean field must be kept weed-free from the V1 to R1 (9-47 days after crop emergence (DAE) or 111.20 to 743.05 accumulated thermal units (ATU) and between the V7 and R3 (26-52 DAE or 374.55 to 832.75 ATU) at 0 and 25 kg.ha -1 of starter fertilizer level, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1182 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Starter fertilizer delayed the end of the critical period of weed control in soybean slightly, by 5 days.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
starter fertilizere0
Outcome
end of the CPWCe0
Direction
delayede0
Value
5 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–42 · show in text ↑
e0

“Generally, the use of starter fertilizer slightly delayed the end of the CPWC (by 5 days), but this condition shortened the CPWC by 12 days because of the later beginning of the CPWC (by 17 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1379 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Starter fertilizer shortened the critical period of weed control in soybean by 12 days.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
starter fertilizere0
Outcome
CPWCe0
Direction
shortenede0
Value
12 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–42 · show in text ↑
e0

“Generally, the use of starter fertilizer slightly delayed the end of the CPWC (by 5 days), but this condition shortened the CPWC by 12 days because of the later beginning of the CPWC (by 17 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1379 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Starter fertilizer made the critical period of weed control in soybean begin later, by 17 days.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
starter fertilizere0
Outcome
beginning of the CPWCe0
Direction
latere0
Value
17 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–42 · show in text ↑
e0

“Generally, the use of starter fertilizer slightly delayed the end of the CPWC (by 5 days), but this condition shortened the CPWC by 12 days because of the later beginning of the CPWC (by 17 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1379 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that monoammonium phosphate as starter fertilizer can reduce the time needed for weed control in soybean and thus herbicide application and cultivation.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
monoammonium phosphate as starter fertilizere0
Outcome
reduce the time needed for weed controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of monoammonium phosphate as starter fertilizer can reduce the time needed for weed control in soybean field and consequently lead to less herbicide application and cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1427–1615 · show in text ↑

competition · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

47 papers: 4 positive, 43 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

climate site · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

73 papers: 36 positive, 37 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

fertilization · weed · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 11 positive, 5 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.