Paper · 2010 · HortScience

Peel Color and Blemishes in ‘Granny Smith’ Apples in Relation to Canopy Light Environment

Jacques R. Fouché; Stephanie C. Roberts; Stephanie J.E. Midgley; et al.

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
32
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The dark green apple cultivar, Granny Smith (GS), makes up 25% of the South African apple industry. However, production of GS is becoming unprofitable as a result of a high incidence of sunburn, red blush, and pale green fruit that decreases the proportion of Class 1 fruit that is suitable for export to more lucrative markets. This study was conducted to investigate the relationship between canopy position and external fruit quality with the ultimate aim to devise pruning and training strategies to maximize export yield. During early fruit development [26 days after full bloom (DAFB)], chlorophyll concentrations were the highest in fruit from higher light environments. Good green color at harvest relied on exposure of fruit to high irradiance at this stage because 50% shading between 14 and 56 DAFB significantly decreased dark green color at harvest. Exposed fruit from the northern side of east–west rows received the highest irradiance throughout the season [53% of full sun photosynthetic photon flux ( PPF )] and had the highest fruit surface temperature (on average 5 °C above ambient). A high proportion of exposed fruit from either side of the row developed red blush. Only 22% to 39% of exposed fruit from the outer canopy did not develop sunburn or red blush. Partially shaded fruit from the southern side of east–west rows received ≈5% of full sunlight and had the highest chlorophyll concentrations and darkest green color at harvest. Deeply shaded inner canopy fruit received ≈2% of full sunlight, had low chlorophyll concentrations, and were lighter green in color. The 10% darkest green fruit received moderately high irradiance (25% to 45% of full sun PPF ) during early fruit development (until ≈80 DAFB) but became progressively shaded (3% of full sun PPF ) during the latter half of the season. Fruit that developed sunburn and the lightest green fruit were exposed to high (1300 μmol·m −2 ·s −1 ) and extremely low (50 μmol·m −2 ·s −1 ) light, respectively, throughout their development. In conclusion, maximum chlorophyll synthesis and dark green color require an open canopy during the first half of fruit development, whereas shading is necessary during the latter half of fruit development to avoid the occurrence of sunburn, red blush, and photothermal destruction of chlorophyll. GS may benefit significantly from the installation of shade netting if combined with rigorous pruning and vigor control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early fruit in higher light had the highest chlorophyll concentrations.

Outcome
chlorophyll concentrationse0
Direction
higheste0
Setting
higher light environmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chlorophyll concentrations were the highest in fruit from higher light environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–676 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading between 14 and 56 DAFB decreased dark green color at harvest.

Treatment
50% shading between 14 and 56 DAFBe0
Outcome
dark green colore0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“50% shading between 14 and 56 DAFB significantly decreased dark green color at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–861 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Northern exposed fruit received 53% of full sun PPF.

Outcome
irradiancee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
53% of full sun photosynthetic photon fluxe0
Setting
northern side of east–west rowse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exposed fruit from the northern side of east–west rows received the highest irradiance throughout the season [53% of full sun photosynthetic photon flux ( PPF )]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–1024 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Northern exposed fruit surface temperature averaged 5 °C above ambient.

Outcome
fruit surface temperaturee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5 °C above ambiente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“had the highest fruit surface temperature (on average 5 °C above ambient)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1102 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A high proportion of exposed fruit developed red blush.

Outcome
red blushe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A high proportion of exposed fruit from either side of the row developed red blush”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1186 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only 22% to 39% of exposed outer canopy fruit avoided both sunburn and red blush.

Outcome
did not develop sunburn or red blushe0
Value
22% to 39%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Only 22% to 39% of exposed fruit from the outer canopy did not develop sunburn or red blush”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1279 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Partially shaded southern fruit had the highest chlorophyll concentration and darkest green color.

Outcome
highest chlorophyll concentrations and darkest green colore0
Direction
higheste0
Value
≈5% of full sunlighte0
Setting
southern side of east–west rowse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Partially shaded fruit from the southern side of east–west rows received ≈5% of full sunlight and had the highest chlorophyll concentrations and darkest green color at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1456 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deeply shaded inner fruit had low chlorophyll and lighter green color.

Outcome
low chlorophyll concentrations, and were lighter green in colore0
Direction
lowe0
Value
≈2% of full sunlighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Deeply shaded inner canopy fruit received ≈2% of full sunlight, had low chlorophyll concentrations, and were lighter green in color”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1458–1589 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–49 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The darkest green fruit experienced moderate early irradiance and later shading.

Outcome
darkest green fruite0
Qualifier
progressively shadede0
Setting
moderately high irradiancee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 10% darkest green fruit received moderately high irradiance (25% to 45% of full sun PPF ) during early fruit development (until ≈80 DAFB) but became progressively shaded (3% of full sun PPF ) during the latter half of the season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1591–1823 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–49 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunburn fruit was exposed to high light throughout development.

Outcome
developed sunburne0
Value
1300 μmol·m −2 ·s −1e0
Setting
highe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit that developed sunburn and the lightest green fruit were exposed to high (1300 μmol·m −2 ·s −1 ) and extremely low (50 μmol·m −2 ·s −1 ) light, respectively, throughout their development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1825–2017 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–49 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lightest green fruit was exposed to extremely low light throughout development.

Outcome
lightest green fruite0
Direction
lighteste0
Value
50 μmol·m −2 ·s −1e0
Setting
extremely lowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit that developed sunburn and the lightest green fruit were exposed to high (1300 μmol·m −2 ·s −1 ) and extremely low (50 μmol·m −2 ·s −1 ) light, respectively, throughout their development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1825–2017 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–49 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend early open canopy followed by late shading for green color and blemish avoidance.

Outcome
an open canopy during the first half of fruit developmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum chlorophyll synthesis and dark green color require an open canopy during the first half of fruit development, whereas shading is necessary during the latter half of fruit development to avoid the occurrence of sunburn, red blush, and photothermal destruction of chlorophyll”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2034–2315 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–49 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest shade netting combined with pruning and vigor control.

Outcome
installation of shade nettinge0
Qualifier
if combined with rigorous pruning and vigor controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GS may benefit significantly from the installation of shade netting if combined with rigorous pruning and vigor control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2317–2436 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–49 · show in text ↑

shade · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 2 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.