Paper · 2002 · Plant Cell & Environment

Membrane stabilization by abscisic acid under cold aids proline in alleviating chilling injury in maize (Zea mays L.) cultured cells

W. P. Chen; P. H. Li

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
59
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract Previous studies of maize suspension‐cultured cells showed that abscisic acid (ABA) treatment at warm temperatures improved the tolerance of cells to subsequent chilling. In the present study, it is shown that both ABA‐treated and untreated maize cells accumulated proline in response to chilling. However, ABA‐treated cells displayed less lipid peroxidation during chilling, and thus, unlike untreated cells, were able to retain the accumulated proline intracellularly. Proline application experiments indicate that an intracellular proline level higher than 2 µ mole (g FW) −1 prior to chilling was needed to meaningfully reduce chilling‐enhanced lipid peroxidation and significantly improve chilling tolerance. The results suggest that total proline accumulation in ABA‐treated as well as untreated cells during chilling was enough to potentially improve chilling tolerance, but proline leakage rendered the control cells unable to benefit from the endogenous synthesis of proline in relation to the alleviation of chilling injury. Proline participated in chilling tolerance improvement in ABA‐treated maize cells, as evidenced by: (1) the inhibition of proline accumulation by l ‐methionine‐ d , l ‐sulphoximine (MSO), an inhibitor of glutamine synthetase, reduced ABA‐improved chilling tolerance, and (2) the addition of glutamine into the medium prevented the MSO‐induced reduction in chilling tolerance. The revised relationship between proline accumulation and membrane stability at cold is discussed in the light of these current findings.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilling caused proline accumulation in both ABA-treated and untreated maize cells.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
chillinge0
Outcome
accumulated prolinee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both ABA‐treated and untreated maize cells accumulated proline in response to chilling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–305 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ABA-treated maize cells displayed less lipid peroxidation during chilling than untreated cells.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
ABA‐treatede0
Outcome
lipid peroxidatione0
Direction
lesse0
Qualifier
during chillinge0
Comparator
untreated cellse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ABA‐treated cells displayed less lipid peroxidation during chilling, and thus, unlike untreated cells, were able to retain the accumulated proline intracellularly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–478 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ABA-treated maize cells retained accumulated proline intracellularly during chilling, unlike untreated cells.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
ABA‐treatede0
Outcome
retain the accumulated proline intracellularlye0
Comparator
untreated cellse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ABA‐treated cells displayed less lipid peroxidation during chilling, and thus, unlike untreated cells, were able to retain the accumulated proline intracellularly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–478 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intracellular proline above 2 µ mole (g FW) −1 before chilling was needed to reduce chilling-enhanced lipid peroxidation.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
intracellular proline level higher than 2 µ mole (g FW) −1 prior to chillinge0
Outcome
chilling‐enhanced lipid peroxidatione0
Direction
reducee0
Value
2 µ mole (g FW) −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an intracellular proline level higher than 2 µ mole (g FW) −1 prior to chilling was needed to meaningfully reduce chilling‐enhanced lipid peroxidation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–676 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intracellular proline above 2 µ mole (g FW) −1 before chilling significantly improved chilling tolerance.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
intracellular proline level higher than 2 µ mole (g FW) −1 prior to chillinge0
Outcome
chilling tolerancee0
Direction
improvee0
Value
2 µ mole (g FW) −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an intracellular proline level higher than 2 µ mole (g FW) −1 prior to chilling was needed to meaningfully reduce chilling‐enhanced lipid peroxidation and significantly improve chilling tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–721 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inhibition of proline accumulation by MSO reduced ABA-improved chilling tolerance.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
l ‐methionine‐ d , l ‐sulphoximine (MSO)e0
Gene
glutamine synthetasee0
Outcome
ABA‐improved chilling tolerancee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the inhibition of proline accumulation by l ‐methionine‐ d , l ‐sulphoximine (MSO), an inhibitor of glutamine synthetase, reduced ABA‐improved chilling tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1309 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding glutamine prevented the MSO-induced reduction in chilling tolerance.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
addition of glutamine into the mediume0
Outcome
chilling tolerancee0
Direction
preventede0
Comparator
MSOe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the addition of glutamine into the medium prevented the MSO‐induced reduction in chilling tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1319–1418 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–103 · show in text ↑

(+)-abscisic acid · physiology: osmolytes · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

proline · tolerance: abiotic · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

proline · physiology: oxidative · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

(+)-abscisic acid · physiology: oxidative · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

cold · tolerance: abiotic · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

cold · physiology: oxidative · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 2 positive, 21 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.