Paper · 2014 · Plant Pathology

Complex interplay of future climate levels of CO 2 , ozone and temperature on susceptibility to fungal diseases in barley

B. L. Mikkelsen; R. B. Jørgensen; M. F. Lyngkjær

10
claims
10
verbatim quotes
47
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Barley ( H ordeum vulgare ) was grown in different climatic environments with elevated [ CO 2 ] (700 vs 385 ppm), [ O 3 ] (60/90 vs 20 ppb) and temperature (24/19 vs 19/12° C day/night) as single factors and in combinations, to evaluate the impact of these climatic factors on photosynthesis and susceptibility to powdery mildew and spot blotch disease. No significant increase in net CO 2 assimilation rate was observed in barley grown under elevated [ CO 2 ] at ambient temperature. However, this rate was positively stimulated under elevated temperature together with a slightly higher potential quantum efficiency of PSII , both at ambient and elevated [ CO 2 ], suggesting that photosynthesis was not limited by [ CO 2 ] at ambient temperature. When growing under elevated temperature or [ O 3 ], infection by the biotrophic powdery mildew fungus decreased, whereas disease symptoms and growth of the toxin‐secreting hemibiotrophic spot blotch fungus increased compared to ambient conditions, implying that climate‐induced changes in disease severity could be linked to the trophic lifestyle of the pathogens. Elevated [ CO 2 ] decreased powdery mildew infection but had no effect on spot blotch disease compared to ambient condition. However, the effect of elevated [ CO 2 ], [ O 3 ] and temperature did not act in an additive manner when combined. This led to a surprising disease development in the combination treatments, where powdery mildew infection increased despite the individual reducing effect of the climatic factors, and spot blotch disease decreased despite the individual promoting effect of temperature and ozone, emphasizing the importance of conducting multifactorial experiments when evaluating the potential effects of climate change.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated carbon dioxide did not significantly increase net assimilation at ambient temperature.

Treatment
elevated [ CO 2 ]e0
Outcome
net CO 2 assimilation ratee0
Direction
No significant increasee0
Comparator
ambient temperaturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No significant increase in net CO 2 assimilation rate was observed in barley grown under elevated [ CO 2 ] at ambient temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–483 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated temperature stimulated net assimilation.

Treatment
elevated temperaturee0
Outcome
this ratee0
Direction
positively stimulatede0
Comparator
ambiente0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“this rate was positively stimulated under elevated temperature together with a slightly higher potential quantum efficiency of PSII , both at ambient and elevated [ CO 2 ]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–665 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated temperature slightly raised potential quantum efficiency of PSII.

Treatment
elevated temperaturee0
Outcome
potential quantum efficiency of PSIIe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
ambiente0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“under elevated temperature together with a slightly higher potential quantum efficiency of PSII , both at ambient and elevated [ CO 2 ]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–665 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated temperature reduced powdery mildew infection.

Treatment
elevated temperaturee0
Interactor
powdery mildew funguse0pathogen
Outcome
infection by the biotrophic powdery mildew funguse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“When growing under elevated temperature or [ O 3 ], infection by the biotrophic powdery mildew fungus decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–861 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated ozone reduced powdery mildew infection.

Treatment
[ O 3 ]e0
Interactor
powdery mildew funguse0pathogen
Outcome
infection by the biotrophic powdery mildew funguse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“When growing under elevated temperature or [ O 3 ], infection by the biotrophic powdery mildew fungus decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–861 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated temperature increased spot blotch disease symptoms and fungal growth.

Interactor
spot blotch funguse0pathogen
Outcome
disease symptoms and growth of the toxin‐secreting hemibiotrophic spot blotch funguse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
ambient conditionse0

Not reportedTaxonTreatment

Verbatim

e0

“disease symptoms and growth of the toxin‐secreting hemibiotrophic spot blotch fungus increased compared to ambient conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–996 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated carbon dioxide decreased powdery mildew infection.

Treatment
Elevated [ CO 2 ]e0
Interactor
powdery mildewe0pathogen
Outcome
powdery mildew infectione0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
ambient conditione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Elevated [ CO 2 ] decreased powdery mildew infection but had no effect on spot blotch disease compared to ambient condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1238 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated carbon dioxide had no effect on spot blotch disease.

Treatment
Elevated [ CO 2 ]e0
Interactor
spot blotche0pathogen
Outcome
spot blotch diseasee0
Direction
had no effecte0
Comparator
ambient conditione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Elevated [ CO 2 ] decreased powdery mildew infection but had no effect on spot blotch disease compared to ambient condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1238 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined climate treatments increased powdery mildew infection despite individual reductions.

Treatment
climatic factorse0
Interactor
powdery mildewe0pathogen
Outcome
powdery mildew infectione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“powdery mildew infection increased despite the individual reducing effect of the climatic factors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1437–1534 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined climate treatments decreased spot blotch disease despite individual promoting effects.

Treatment
temperature and ozonee0
Interactor
spot blotche0pathogen
Outcome
spot blotch diseasee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“spot blotch disease decreased despite the individual promoting effect of temperature and ozone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1540–1634 · show in text ↑

co2 · physiology: photosynthesis · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 5 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.