Paper · 2011 · Weed Technology

Potato Response to Simulated Glyphosate Drift

Joel Felix; Rick Boydston; Ian C. Burke

12
claims
15
verbatim quotes
20
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field studies were conducted in 2008 in Ontario, OR and Paterson, WA to determine the effect of simulated glyphosate drift on ‘Ranger Russet’ potato, including visual injury, shikimic acid accumulation, and tuber yield. Glyphosate was applied at 8.5, 54, 107, 215, and 423 g ae ha −1 ; which corresponds to 0.01, 0.064, 0.126, 0.254, and 0.5 of the lowest recommended (846 g ha −1 ) single application dose for glyphosate-resistant corn and sugar beet. Glyphosate was applied when potato plants were at 10-cm height, stolon hooking, tuber initiation, or bulking stage. The greatest visual foliar injury was observed when glyphosate was applied at a dose of 54 g ha −1 or greater and potato plants were at the hooking stage. The lowest foliar injury was observed when glyphosate was applied to potato plants at the bulking stage. The I 50 glyphosate dose at 42 d after treatment (DAT) was estimated to be 167 g ha −1 for potatoes sprayed at the hooking stage. The corresponding glyphosate dose to result in 50% injury for potatoes sprayed at tuber initiation, 10-cm height, and bulking stages were 129%, 338%, and 438%, respectively, greater than hooking stage. The U.S. No.1 potato yield was inversely related to vine injury and shikimic acid accumulation. Shikimic acid accumulation increased when glyphosate was applied at 107 g ha −1 or greater. U.S. No.1 potato yield was reduced by 46% and 84% relative to the untreated control (55 and 76 T/ha) when glyphosate was applied at 107 g ha −1 to plants in the hooking stage at Ontario and Paterson, respectively. Tuber yields at both sites were lowest when glyphosate was applied at hooking and tuber initiation stages.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar injury was greatest at hooking after doses of at least 54 g ha −1.

Organ / stage
hooking stagee0
Treatment
glyphosatee0
Outcome
visual foliar injurye0
Direction
greateste0
Value
54 g ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The greatest visual foliar injury was observed when glyphosate was applied at a dose of 54 g ha −1 or greater and potato plants were at the hooking stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–723 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar injury was lowest when glyphosate was applied during bulking.

Taxon
potato plantsSolanum tuberosume0
Organ / stage
bulking stagee0
Treatment
glyphosatee0
Outcome
foliar injurye0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest foliar injury was observed when glyphosate was applied to potato plants at the bulking stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–828 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The glyphosate I 50 dose at 42 DAT was 167 g ha −1 for hooking-stage potatoes.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosume0
Organ / stage
hooking stagee0
Outcome
I 50 glyphosate dosee0
Value
167 g ha −1e0
Qualifier
42 d after treatment (DAT)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The I 50 glyphosate dose at 42 d after treatment (DAT) was estimated to be 167 g ha −1 for potatoes sprayed at the hooking stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–958 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 50% injury dose at tuber initiation was 129% greater than at hooking.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosume0
Organ / stage
tuber initiatione0
Outcome
glyphosate dose to result in 50% injurye0
Direction
greatere0
Value
129%e0
Comparator
hooking stagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The corresponding glyphosate dose to result in 50% injury for potatoes sprayed at tuber initiation, 10-cm height, and bulking stages were 129%, 338%, and 438%, respectively, greater than hooking stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1160 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 50% injury dose at 10-cm height was 338% greater than at hooking.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosume0
Organ / stage
10-cm heighte0
Outcome
glyphosate dose to result in 50% injurye0
Direction
greatere0
Value
338%e0
Comparator
hooking stagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The corresponding glyphosate dose to result in 50% injury for potatoes sprayed at tuber initiation, 10-cm height, and bulking stages were 129%, 338%, and 438%, respectively, greater than hooking stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1160 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 50% injury dose at bulking stages was 438% greater than at hooking.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosume0
Organ / stage
bulking stagese0
Outcome
glyphosate dose to result in 50% injurye0
Direction
greatere0
Value
438%e0
Comparator
hooking stagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The corresponding glyphosate dose to result in 50% injury for potatoes sprayed at tuber initiation, 10-cm height, and bulking stages were 129%, 338%, and 438%, respectively, greater than hooking stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1160 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

U.S. No.1 yield declined as vine injury increased.

Organ / stage
vinee0
Outcome
U.S. No.1 potato yielde0
Direction
inverselye0
Qualifier
vine injurye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The U.S. No.1 potato yield was inversely related to vine injury and shikimic acid accumulation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1256 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

U.S. No.1 yield declined as shikimic acid accumulated.

Compound
shikimic acide0
Outcome
U.S. No.1 potato yielde0
Direction
inverselye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The U.S. No.1 potato yield was inversely related to vine injury and shikimic acid accumulation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1256 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shikimic acid accumulation rose at glyphosate doses of at least 107 g ha −1.

Treatment
glyphosatee0
Outcome
Shikimic acid accumulatione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
107 g ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shikimic acid accumulation increased when glyphosate was applied at 107 g ha −1 or greater.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1348 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hooking-stage treatment at 107 g ha −1 reduced U.S. No.1 yield by 46% at Ontario.

Organ / stage
hooking stagee0
Treatment
glyphosate was applied at 107 g ha −1e0
Outcome
U.S. No.1 potato yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
46%e0
Comparator
untreated controle0
Setting
Ontarioe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“U.S. No.1 potato yield was reduced by 46% and 84% relative to the untreated control (55 and 76 T/ha) when glyphosate was applied at 107 g ha −1 to plants in the hooking stage at Ontario and Paterson, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1562 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hooking-stage treatment at 107 g ha −1 reduced U.S. No.1 yield by 84% at Paterson.

Organ / stage
hooking stagee0
Treatment
glyphosate was applied at 107 g ha −1e0
Outcome
U.S. No.1 potato yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
84%e0
Comparator
untreated controle0
Setting
Patersone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“U.S. No.1 potato yield was reduced by 46% and 84% relative to the untreated control (55 and 76 T/ha) when glyphosate was applied at 107 g ha −1 to plants in the hooking stage at Ontario and Paterson, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1562 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tuber yields were lowest after glyphosate treatment at hooking and tuber initiation.

Organ / stage
hooking and tuber initiation stagese0
Treatment
glyphosatee0
Outcome
Tuber yieldse0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tuber yields at both sites were lowest when glyphosate was applied at hooking and tuber initiation stages.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1563–1669 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑

glyphosate · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

12 papers: 4 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

glyphosate · crop injury · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

glyphosate · molecular: metabolites · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.