Paper · 2001 · Global Change Biology

A global perspective of ground level, 'ambient' carbon dioxide for assessing the response of plants to atmospheric CO2

L. H. Ziska; O. Ghannoum; J. T. Baker; et al.

7
claims
9
verbatim quotes
39
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

For most studies involving the response of plants to future concentrations of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2), a current concentration of 360–370 μatm is assumed, based on recent data obtained from the Mauna Loa observatory. In the present study, average seasonal diurnal values of ambient CO2 obtained at ground level from three global locations (Australia, Japan and the USA) indicated that the average CO2 (at canopy height) can vary from over 500 μatm at night to 350 μatm during the day with average 24-h values ranging from 390 to 465 μatm. At all sites sampled, ambient CO2 rose to a maximum value during the pre-dawn period (03.00–06.00 hours); at sunrise, CO2 remained elevated for several hours before declining to a steady-state concentration between 350 and 400 μatm by mid-morning (08.00–10.00 hours). Responses of plant growth to simulations of the observed variation of in situ CO2 were compared to growth at a constant CO2 concentration in controlled environment chambers. Three diurnal patterns were used (constant 370 μatm CO2, constant 370 during the day (07.00–19.00 hours), high CO2 (500 μatm) at night; or, high CO2 (500 μatm) at night and during the early morning (07.00–09.00 hours) decreasing to 370 μatm by 10.00 hours). Three plant species − soybean (Glycine max, L (Merr.), velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti L.) and tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) − were grown in each of these environments. For soybean, high night-time CO2 resulted in a significant increase in net assimilation rate (NAR), plant growth, leaf area and biomass relative to a constant ambient value of CO2 by 29 days after sowing. Significant increases in NAR for all three species, and significant increases in leaf area, growth and total biomass for two of the three C3 species tested (velvetleaf and soybean) were also observed after 29 days post sowing for the high night/early morning diurnal pattern of CO2. Data from these experiments suggest that the ambient CO2 concentration experienced by some plants is higher than the Mauna Loa average, and that growth of some agricultural species at in situ CO2 levels can differ significantly from the constant CO2 value used as a control in many CO2 experiments. This suggests that a reassessment of control conditions used to quantify the response of plants to future, elevated CO2 may be required.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canopy-height ambient CO2 ranged from above 500 μatm at night to 350 μatm by day, with 24-hour means of 390 to 465 μatm.

Outcome
average CO2 (at canopy height)e0
Value
390 to 465 μatme0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“average CO2 (at canopy height) can vary from over 500 μatm at night to 350 μatm during the day with average 24-h values ranging from 390 to 465 μatm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–546 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ambient CO2 peaked before dawn and reached 350 to 400 μatm by mid-morning.

Outcome
ambient CO2e0
Direction
declininge0
Value
350 and 400 μatme0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“ambient CO2 rose to a maximum value during the pre-dawn period (03.00–06.00 hours); at sunrise, CO2 remained elevated for several hours before declining to a steady-state concentration between 350 and 400 μatm by mid-morning (08.00–10.00 hours)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High nighttime CO2 increased soybean net assimilation rate, growth, leaf area and biomass relative to constant ambient CO2 after 29 days.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
high night-time CO2e0
Outcome
net assimilation rate (NAR), plant growth, leaf area and biomasse0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
29 days after sowinge0
Comparator
a constant ambient value of CO2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For soybean, high night-time CO2 resulted in a significant increase in net assimilation rate (NAR), plant growth, leaf area and biomass relative to a constant ambient value of CO2 by 29 days after sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1424–1627 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The high nighttime and early-morning CO2 pattern significantly increased NAR in soybean, velvetleaf and tomato.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
high night/early morning diurnal pattern of CO2e2
Outcome
NARe0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant increases in NAR for all three species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1629–1679 · show in text ↑
e1

“soybean (Glycine max, L (Merr.), velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti L.) and tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1379 · show in text ↑
e2

“high night/early morning diurnal pattern of CO2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1863–1910 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The high nighttime and early-morning CO2 pattern increased leaf area, growth and biomass in velvetleaf.

Taxon
velvetleafAbutilon theophrastie0
Treatment
high night/early morning diurnal pattern of CO2e0
Outcome
leaf area, growth and total biomasse0
Direction
increasese0
Qualifier
29 days post sowinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abutilon theophrasti
Abutilon theophrasti · TaxonI.Sáček, senior · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant increases in NAR for all three species, and significant increases in leaf area, growth and total biomass for two of the three C3 species tested (velvetleaf and soybean) were also observed after 29 days post sowing for the high night/early morning diurnal pattern of CO2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1629–1910 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The high nighttime and early-morning CO2 pattern increased leaf area, growth and biomass in soybean.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
high night/early morning diurnal pattern of CO2e0
Outcome
leaf area, growth and total biomasse0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant increases in NAR for all three species, and significant increases in leaf area, growth and total biomass for two of the three C3 species tested (velvetleaf and soybean) were also observed after 29 days post sowing for the high night/early morning diurnal pattern of CO2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1629–1910 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggested reassessing control CO2 conditions for elevated CO2 experiments.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Outcome
reassessment of control conditionse0

Verbatim

e0

“a reassessment of control conditions used to quantify the response of plants to future, elevated CO2 may be required”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2230–2346 · show in text ↑

co2 · growth · Abutilon theophrasti (velvetleaf)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

co2 · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

101 papers: 83 positive, 18 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

97 papers more in this group

See all 101 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.