Paper · 2008

ALLEVIATION OF ADVERSE EFFECTS OF SALT STRESS ON SUNFLOWER (HELIANTHUS ANNUUS L.) BY EXOGENOUS APPLICATION OF SALICYLIC ACID: GROWTH AND PHOTOSYNTHESIS

Sibgha Noreen; Muhammad Ashraf

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
128
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The present study was conducted to assess whether exogenously applied SA as a foliar spray could ameliorate the adverse effects of salt stress on sunflower plants. Two lines of sunflower (Hisun-33 and SF-187) were grown under normal or saline (120 mM NaCl) conditions. Different levels of salicylic acid (0, 100, 200, 300 mg L -1 ) were applied as a foliar spray. Salt stress reduced the growth of both lines, but both cultivars were equally responsive to the stress. Application of 200 mg L -1 of SA caused an increase in biomass of both lines under non-saline or saline conditions. Photosynthetic rate of both cultivars increased due to SA applied foliarly both under control and saline conditions, particularly in line SF-187. Furthermore, increase in growth of both cultivars due to exogenously applied SA may have been due to changes in photosynthesis. However, SA applied as a foliar spray did not change the sub-stomatal CO2 suggesting that stomtal factors were not the major controlling factors for photosynthesis. Overall, the adverse effects of salt stress could be alleviated by exogenous application of SA.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress reduced growth in both sunflower lines.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse1
Treatment
Salt stresse0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salt stress reduced the growth of both lines, but both cultivars were equally responsive to the stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 364–467 · show in text ↑
e1

“sunflower plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–162 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both sunflower cultivars responded equally to salt stress.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse1
Outcome
equally responsive to the stresse0
Direction
equallye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both cultivars were equally responsive to the stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–467 · show in text ↑
e1

“sunflower plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 200 mg L -1 SA increased biomass of both lines under non-saline or saline conditions.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse1
Treatment
200 mg L -1 of SAe0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
under non-saline or saline conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 200 mg L -1 of SA caused an increase in biomass of both lines under non-saline or saline conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–583 · show in text ↑
e1

“sunflower plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar SA increased photosynthetic rate in both sunflower cultivars, especially SF-187.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse1
Material
SF-187e0
Treatment
SA applied foliarlye0
Outcome
Photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
both under control and saline conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Photosynthetic rate of both cultivars increased due to SA applied foliarly both under control and saline conditions, particularly in line SF-187.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–729 · show in text ↑
e1

“sunflower plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar SA did not change sub-stomatal CO2.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse1
Treatment
SA applied as a foliar spraye0
Outcome
sub-stomatal CO2e0
Direction
did not changee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SA applied as a foliar spray did not change the sub-stomatal CO2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–931 · show in text ↑
e1

“sunflower plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–162 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors suggest the SA growth response may be due to changes in photosynthesis.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse1
Treatment
exogenously applied SAe0
Outcome
growthe0
Qualifier
changes in photosynthesise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increase in growth of both cultivars due to exogenously applied SA may have been due to changes in photosynthesis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–857 · show in text ↑
e1

“sunflower plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–162 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors suggest stomatal factors were not the main controls of photosynthesis.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse1
Outcome
photosynthesise0
Qualifier
stomtal factorse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“suggesting that stomtal factors were not the major controlling factors for photosynthesis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1022 · show in text ↑
e1

“sunflower plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–162 · show in text ↑

salicylic acid · growth · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results differ

19 papers: 17 positive, 2 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

salicylic acid · physiology: photosynthesis · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

salinity · growth · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results differ

53 papers: 6 positive, 47 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.