Paper · 2002 · Global Change Biology

The influence of plants grown under elevated CO2and N fertilization on soil nitrogen dynamics

Piedad Martín‐Olmedo; Robert M. Rees; John Grace

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
56
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract We investigated the effects of spring barley growth on nitrogen (N) transformations and rhizosphere microbial processes in a controlled system under elevated carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) at two levels of N fertilization (applied with 15 N labelling). After 25 d, elevated CO 2 (twice ambient) increased plant growth (dry weight, DW) by 141% at low‐N fertilization and by 60% at high‐N fertilization, but its positive effect on the root‐to‐shoot ratio was only significant at low‐N input. As a result of this plant response, elevated CO 2 caused a greater soil CO 2 efflux, rhizosphere soil DW, and soil microbial biomass under N‐limiting conditions than under high N availability. Elevated CO 2 also caused a significant ( P < 0.001) increase in the N recovered by the plant from both the labelled (N f ) and unlabelled (N s + N uf ) N pools. The dynamics of N in the system as affected by elevated CO 2 were driven principally by mineralization–immobilization turnover, with little loss by denitrification. Under N‐limiting conditions, there is evidence to suggest enhanced nutrient release from soil organic matter (SOM) pools—a process which could be defined as priming. The results of our experiment did not indicate a direct plant‐mediated effect of elevated CO 2 on nitrous oxide (N 2 O) fluxes or denitrification activity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At low nitrogen, elevated carbon dioxide increased barley dry weight by 141%.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
elevated CO 2 (twice ambient)e0
Outcome
plant growth (dry weight, DW)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
141%e0
Qualifier
low‐N fertilizatione0
Comparator
ambiente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“elevated CO 2 (twice ambient) increased plant growth (dry weight, DW) by 141% at low‐N fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–366 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring barley growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At high nitrogen, elevated carbon dioxide increased barley dry weight by 60%.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
elevated CO 2 (twice ambient)e0
Outcome
plant growth (dry weight, DW)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
60%e0
Qualifier
high‐N fertilizatione0
Comparator
ambiente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“elevated CO 2 (twice ambient) increased plant growth (dry weight, DW) by 141% at low‐N fertilization and by 60% at high‐N fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–401 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring barley growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated carbon dioxide significantly increased the root-to-shoot ratio only at low nitrogen.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Outcome
root‐to‐shoot ratioe0
Direction
positivee0
Qualifier
low‐N inpute0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“its positive effect on the root‐to‐shoot ratio was only significant at low‐N input.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–490 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring barley growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under nitrogen limitation, elevated carbon dioxide caused greater soil carbon dioxide efflux.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
elevated CO 2e0
Outcome
soil CO 2 effluxe0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
high N availabilitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“elevated CO 2 caused a greater soil CO 2 efflux, rhizosphere soil DW, and soil microbial biomass under N‐limiting conditions than under high N availability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–683 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring barley growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under nitrogen limitation, elevated carbon dioxide caused greater rhizosphere soil dry weight.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
elevated CO 2e0
Outcome
rhizosphere soil DWe0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
high N availabilitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“elevated CO 2 caused a greater soil CO 2 efflux, rhizosphere soil DW, and soil microbial biomass under N‐limiting conditions than under high N availability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–683 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring barley growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under nitrogen limitation, elevated carbon dioxide caused greater soil microbial biomass.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
elevated CO 2e0
Outcome
soil microbial biomasse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
high N availabilitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“elevated CO 2 caused a greater soil CO 2 efflux, rhizosphere soil DW, and soil microbial biomass under N‐limiting conditions than under high N availability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–683 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring barley growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated carbon dioxide significantly increased plant recovery of labeled nitrogen.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
Elevated CO 2e0
Outcome
N recovered by the plant from both the labelled (N f )e0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Elevated CO 2 also caused a significant ( P < 0.001) increase in the N recovered by the plant from both the labelled (N f ) and unlabelled (N s + N uf ) N pools.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–845 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring barley growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated carbon dioxide significantly increased plant recovery of unlabeled nitrogen.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
Elevated CO 2e0
Outcome
unlabelled (N s + N uf ) N poolse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Elevated CO 2 also caused a significant ( P < 0.001) increase in the N recovered by the plant from both the labelled (N f ) and unlabelled (N s + N uf ) N pools.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–845 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring barley growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–60 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineralization–immobilization turnover principally drove soil nitrogen dynamics.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Outcome
dynamics of Ne0
Qualifier
mineralization–immobilization turnovere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The dynamics of N in the system as affected by elevated CO 2 were driven principally by mineralization–immobilization turnover, with little loss by denitrification.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–1010 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring barley growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–60 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen loss by denitrification was small.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Outcome
little loss by denitrificatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with little loss by denitrification.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1010 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring barley growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–60 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Evidence suggested enhanced nutrient release from soil organic matter under nitrogen limitation.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Outcome
nutrient release from soil organic matter (SOM) poolse0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
N‐limiting conditionse0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under N‐limiting conditions, there is evidence to suggest enhanced nutrient release from soil organic matter (SOM) pools”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1131 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring barley growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The experiment did not indicate a direct plant-mediated effect on nitrous oxide fluxes or denitrification.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
elevated CO 2e0
Outcome
nitrous oxide (N 2 O) fluxes or denitrification activitye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“did not indicate a direct plant‐mediated effect of elevated CO 2 on nitrous oxide (N 2 O) fluxes or denitrification activity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1332 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring barley growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–60 · show in text ↑

co2 · molecular: metabolites · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

co2 · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 19 positive, 3 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.