Paper · 2013 · Plant Cell & Environment

Ethylene limits abscisic acid‐ or soil drying‐induced stomatal closure in aged wheat leaves

LIN CHEN; IAN C. DODD; WILLIAM J. DAVIES; et al.

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
98
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The mechanism of age-induced decreased stomatal sensitivity to abscisic acid (ABA) and soil drying has been explored here. Older, fully expanded leaves partly lost their ability to close stomata in response to foliar ABA sprays, and soil drying which stimulated endogenous ABA production, while young fully expanded leaves closed their stomata more fully. However, ABA- or soil drying-induced stomatal closure of older leaves was partly restored by pretreating plants with 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP), which can antagonize ethylene receptors, or by inoculating soil around the roots with the rhizobacterium Variovorax paradoxus 5C-2, which contains 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC)-deaminase. ACC (the immediate biosynthetic precursor of ethylene) sprays revealed higher sensitivity of stomata to ethylene in older leaves than younger leaves, despite no differences in endogenous ACC concentrations or ethylene emission. Taken together, these results indicate that the relative insensitivity of stomatal closure to ABA and soil drying in older leaves is likely due to altered stomatal sensitivity to ethylene, rather than ethylene production. To our knowledge, this is the first study to mechanistically explain diminished stomatal responses to soil moisture deficit in older leaves, and the associated reduction in leaf water-use efficiency.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Older leaves closed stomata less fully than young leaves after ABA sprays.

Organ / stage
Older, fully expanded leavese0
Treatment
foliar ABA sprayse0
Outcome
ability to close stomatae0
Direction
partly loste0
Comparator
young fully expanded leavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Older, fully expanded leaves partly lost their ability to close stomata in response to foliar ABA sprays, and soil drying which stimulated endogenous ABA production, while young fully expanded leaves closed their stomata more fully”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 123–354 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Older leaves closed stomata less fully than young leaves during soil drying.

Organ / stage
Older, fully expanded leavese0
Treatment
soil dryinge0
Outcome
ability to close stomatae0
Direction
partly loste0
Comparator
young fully expanded leavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Older, fully expanded leaves partly lost their ability to close stomata in response to foliar ABA sprays, and soil drying which stimulated endogenous ABA production, while young fully expanded leaves closed their stomata more fully”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 123–354 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP partly restored ABA or drying induced stomatal closure in older leaves.

Treatment
1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP)e0
Outcome
ABA- or soil drying-induced stomatal closure of older leavese0
Direction
partly restorede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ABA- or soil drying-induced stomatal closure of older leaves was partly restored by pretreating plants with 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 365–501 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variovorax paradoxus 5C-2 partly restored ABA or drying induced stomatal closure in older leaves.

Treatment
inoculating soil around the roots with the rhizobacterium Variovorax paradoxus 5C-2e0
Interactor
Variovorax paradoxus 5C-2Variovorax paradoxuse0symbiont
Outcome
ABA- or soil drying-induced stomatal closure of older leavese0
Direction
partly restorede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ABA- or soil drying-induced stomatal closure of older leaves was partly restored by pretreating plants with 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP), which can antagonize ethylene receptors, or by inoculating soil around the roots with the rhizobacterium Variovorax paradoxus 5C-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 365–633 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–84 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Older leaf stomata were more ethylene sensitive than younger leaf stomata.

Organ / stage
older leavese0
Outcome
sensitivity of stomata to ethylenee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
younger leavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ACC (the immediate biosynthetic precursor of ethylene) sprays revealed higher sensitivity of stomata to ethylene in older leaves than younger leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–853 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–84 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Endogenous ACC concentrations did not differ between older and younger leaves.

Organ / stage
older leavese1
Outcome
endogenous ACC concentrationse0
Direction
no differencese0
Comparator
younger leavese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“despite no differences in endogenous ACC concentrations or ethylene emission”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–931 · show in text ↑
e1

“in older leaves than younger leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–853 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–84 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethylene emission did not differ between older and younger leaves.

Organ / stage
older leavese1
Outcome
ethylene emissione0
Direction
no differencese0
Comparator
younger leavese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“despite no differences in endogenous ACC concentrations or ethylene emission”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–931 · show in text ↑
e1

“in older leaves than younger leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–853 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–84 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Altered ethylene sensitivity likely explains weaker ABA and drying stomatal responses in older leaves.

Outcome
relative insensitivity of stomatal closure to ABA and soil drying in older leavese0
Qualifier
altered stomatal sensitivity to ethylenee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the relative insensitivity of stomatal closure to ABA and soil drying in older leaves is likely due to altered stomatal sensitivity to ethylene”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1120 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–84 · show in text ↑

(+)-abscisic acid · physiology: gas exchange · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

12 papers: 7 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

application · physiology: gas exchange · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 21 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

processing · physiology: gas exchange · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

5 papers: 0 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

inoculation · physiology: gas exchange · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.