Paper · 1984 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

INFLUENCE OF TIME AND RATE OF N APPLICATION ON YIELD AND CRUDE PROTEIN OF THREE COOL SEASON GRASSES GROWN ON ORGANIC SOILS

G. L. MALZER; R. P. SCHOPER

10
claims
10
verbatim quotes
10
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Three separate experiments were conducted with orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.), quackgrass (Agropyron repens L.), and reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) to determine the timing and rate effects of N fertilization for forage production on organic soils in northern Minnesota. Nine N treatments, using 0, 168 and 336 kg N/ha, were applied in single or split (up to four) applications during the growing season. Dry matter (DM) production and crude protein content of the forage were determined in a four-clipping management program. With N fertilization total DM production for the 2-yr study was increased, on the average, by 104, 37, and 121% for orchardgrass, quackgrass, and reed canarygrass. Total production of all three grasses was significantly increased up to the 336 kg N/ha application. On the control areas (0 N) quackgrass produced an average of 61 and 82% more total forage than orchardgrass and reed canarygrass. Split applications of fertilizer N during the growing season had relatively little influence on total DM productions. However, applying N later in the growing season significantly increased DM production of reed canarygrass for the third and fourth clippings. Late N applications significantly influenced orchardgrass in the third and fourth clippings consistently during only 1 yr of the experiment and did not alter quack-grass production in either year.Key words: Histosols, Dactylis glomerata L., Agropyron repens L., Phalaris arundinacea L.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization increased orchardgrass total dry matter production by 104%.

Taxon
orchardgrassDactylis glomeratae0
Treatment
N fertilizatione0
Outcome
total DM productione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
104e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dactylis glomerata
Dactylis glomerata · TaxonW. Bulach · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With N fertilization total DM production for the 2-yr study was increased, on the average, by 104, 37, and 121% for orchardgrass, quackgrass, and reed canarygrass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–707 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization increased quackgrass total dry matter production by 37%.

Taxon
quackgrasse0
Treatment
N fertilizatione0
Outcome
total DM productione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
37e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“With N fertilization total DM production for the 2-yr study was increased, on the average, by 104, 37, and 121% for orchardgrass, quackgrass, and reed canarygrass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–707 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization increased reed canarygrass total dry matter production by 121%.

Taxon
reed canarygrasse0
Treatment
N fertilizatione0
Outcome
total DM productione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
121%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“With N fertilization total DM production for the 2-yr study was increased, on the average, by 104, 37, and 121% for orchardgrass, quackgrass, and reed canarygrass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–707 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total production of all three grasses increased significantly through 336 kg N/ha.

Taxon
grassese0
Treatment
336 kg N/ha applicatione0
Outcome
Total productione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Total production of all three grasses was significantly increased up to the 336 kg N/ha application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–808 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without fertilizer, quackgrass produced 61% more forage than orchardgrass.

Taxon
quackgrasse0
Outcome
total foragee0
Direction
moree0
Value
61e0
Comparator
orchardgrasse0

Verbatim

e0

“On the control areas (0 N) quackgrass produced an average of 61 and 82% more total forage than orchardgrass and reed canarygrass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–938 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without fertilizer, quackgrass produced 82% more forage than reed canarygrass.

Taxon
quackgrasse0
Outcome
total foragee0
Direction
moree0
Value
82%e0
Comparator
reed canarygrasse0

Verbatim

e0

“On the control areas (0 N) quackgrass produced an average of 61 and 82% more total forage than orchardgrass and reed canarygrass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–938 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Split nitrogen applications had little effect on total dry matter production.

Treatment
Split applications of fertilizer Ne0
Outcome
total DM productionse0
Direction
relatively little influencee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Split applications of fertilizer N during the growing season had relatively little influence on total DM productions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1056 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Later nitrogen increased reed canarygrass third and fourth clipping dry matter.

Taxon
reed canarygrasse0
Organ / stage
third and fourth clippingse0
Treatment
applying N later in the growing seasone0
Outcome
DM productione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“applying N later in the growing season significantly increased DM production of reed canarygrass for the third and fourth clippings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Late nitrogen affected orchardgrass third and fourth clipping production in one year.

Taxon
orchardgrassDactylis glomeratae0
Treatment
Late N applicationse0
Outcome
third and fourth clippingse0
Qualifier
only 1 yre0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dactylis glomerata
Dactylis glomerata · TaxonW. Bulach · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Late N applications significantly influenced orchardgrass in the third and fourth clippings consistently during only 1 yr of the experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1338 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late nitrogen did not alter quackgrass production in either year.

Taxon
quack-grasse0
Outcome
productione0
Direction
did not altere0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“did not alter quack-grass production in either year.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1395 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Dactylis glomerata (cocksfoot)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.