Paper · 2009 · The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences

IMPACT OF PLANTING METHODS ON WHEAT GRAIN YIELD AND YIELD CONTRIBUTING PARAMETERS

Ghulam Abbas; Muhammad Amjad Ali; Muhammad Azam; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
32
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out during two consecutive years 2006-07 and 2007-08 at two locations in arid area of the Punjab province. The objective of the study was to compare conventional planting method (broadcasting) of wheat sowing with drill planting method for grain yield and its parameters. The experiment comprised of four (15,22.5 and 30 cm spaced rows ad broad casting) treatments arranged in randomized complete block design with three replications in a net plot size of 12x17 m. The results over the years of the study revealed that the germination were statistically at par in drill sowing at 15 cm apart rows and broadcasting. Better plant height was noted in drill planting with 30 and 22.5 cm rows. However, number of spikelets spike -1 and number of grains spike -1 were statistically similar in broadcasting and drilling at 22.5 cm apart rows. Similar 1000-grain weight was recorded in drill sowing at 30, 22.5 cm and broadcasting. The maximum grain yield was obtained through broadcast method and it was statistically at par with drill planting method where row spacing was 22.5 cm. Whereas, drill-planting techniques with row spacing 15 cm and 30 cm, were inferior to broadcast method. It may be concluded that broadcast method is suitable for wheat sowing in sandy loam soils of arid area. Key word: Triticum aestivum L; planting methods; NPK fertilizers; Arid; Pakistan.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat germination was statistically similar between 15 cm drill sowing and broadcasting.

Treatment
drill sowing at 15 cm apart rowse0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
statistically at pare0
Comparator
broadcastinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the germination were statistically at par in drill sowing at 15 cm apart rows and broadcasting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–645 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–35 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat plant height was better under drill planting with 30 cm rows.

Treatment
drill planting with 30e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
Bettere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Better plant height was noted in drill planting with 30 and 22.5 cm rows.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–719 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–35 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat plant height was better under drill planting with 22.5 cm rows.

Treatment
22.5 cm rowse0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
Bettere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Better plant height was noted in drill planting with 30 and 22.5 cm rows.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–719 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat number of spikelets spike -1 was similar under broadcasting and 22.5 cm drilling.

Treatment
drilling at 22.5 cm apart rowse0
Outcome
number of spikelets spike -1e0
Direction
statistically similare0
Comparator
broadcastinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of spikelets spike -1 and number of grains spike -1 were statistically similar in broadcasting and drilling at 22.5 cm apart rows.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–866 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat number of grains spike -1 was similar under broadcasting and 22.5 cm drilling.

Treatment
drilling at 22.5 cm apart rowse0
Outcome
number of grains spike -1e0
Direction
statistically similare0
Comparator
broadcastinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of spikelets spike -1 and number of grains spike -1 were statistically similar in broadcasting and drilling at 22.5 cm apart rows.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–866 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat 1000-grain weight was similar under 30 cm drilling and broadcasting.

Treatment
drill sowing at 30e0
Outcome
1000-grain weighte0
Direction
Similare0
Comparator
broadcastinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similar 1000-grain weight was recorded in drill sowing at 30, 22.5 cm and broadcasting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–954 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat 1000-grain weight was similar under 22.5 cm drilling and broadcasting.

Treatment
22.5 cme0
Outcome
1000-grain weighte0
Direction
Similare0
Comparator
broadcastinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similar 1000-grain weight was recorded in drill sowing at 30, 22.5 cm and broadcasting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–954 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadcast wheat sowing had maximum grain yield, statistically similar to 22.5 cm drilling.

Treatment
broadcast methode0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
drill planting method where row spacing was 22.5 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum grain yield was obtained through broadcast method and it was statistically at par with drill planting method where row spacing was 22.5 cm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1106 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat drill planting at 15 cm was inferior to broadcasting.

Treatment
15 cme0
Outcome
inferiore0
Direction
inferiore0
Comparator
broadcast methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drill-planting techniques with row spacing 15 cm and 30 cm, were inferior to broadcast method.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1210 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat drill planting at 30 cm was inferior to broadcasting.

Treatment
30 cme0
Outcome
inferiore0
Direction
inferiore0
Comparator
broadcast methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drill-planting techniques with row spacing 15 cm and 30 cm, were inferior to broadcast method.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1210 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–35 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend broadcast wheat sowing in arid sandy loam soils.

Outcome
broadcast method is suitable for wheat sowinge0
Setting
sandy loam soils of arid areae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It may be concluded that broadcast method is suitable for wheat sowing in sandy loam soils of arid area.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1315 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–35 · show in text ↑

transplanting · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

176 papers: 129 positive, 47 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

172 papers more in this group

See all 176 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.