Paper · 2006 · Plant Soil and Environment

The effect of inoculation of pea plants with mycorrhizal fungi and Rhizobium on nitrogen and phosphorus assimilation

M. Geneva; G. Zehirov; E. Djonova; et al.

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
63
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The study evaluated the response of pea (Pisum sativum cv. Avola) to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AM) species Glomus mosseae and Glomus intraradices and Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viceae, strain D 293, regarding the growth, photosynthesis, nodulation and nitrogen fixation activity. Pea plants were grown in a glasshouse until the flowering stage (35 days), in 4 kg plastic pots using leached cinnamonic forest soil (Chromic Luvisols - FAO) at P levels 13.2 (P1) and 39.8 (P2) mg P/kg soil. The obtained results demonstrated that the dual inoculation of pea plants significantly increased the plant biomass, photosynthetic rate, nodulation, and nitrogen fixation activity in comparison with single inoculation with Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viceae strain D 293. On the other hand, coinoculation significantly increased the total phosphorus content in plant tissue, acid phosphatase activity and percentage of root colonization. The effectiveness of coinoculation with Rhizobium leguminosarum and Glomus mosseae was higher at the low phosphorus level while the coinoculation with Glomus intraradices appeared to be the most effective at higher phosphorus level.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual inoculation significantly increased pea biomass and photosynthetic rate compared with single Rhizobium inoculation.

Taxon
pea plantsLathyrus oleraceuse0
Treatment
dual inoculatione0
Interactor
Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viceae strain D 293Rhizobium leguminosarume0symbiont
Outcome
plant biomass, photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
single inoculation with Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viceae strain D 293e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium leguminosarum
Rhizobium leguminosarum · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryQaswarah 21 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dual inoculation of pea plants significantly increased the plant biomass, photosynthetic rate, nodulation, and nitrogen fixation activity in comparison with single inoculation with Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viceae strain D 293”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–764 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual inoculation significantly increased pea nodulation and nitrogen fixation activity.

Taxon
pea plantsLathyrus oleraceuse0
Treatment
dual inoculatione0
Interactor
Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viceae strain D 293Rhizobium leguminosarume0symbiont
Outcome
nodulation, and nitrogen fixation activitye0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
single inoculation with Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viceae strain D 293e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium leguminosarum
Rhizobium leguminosarum · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryQaswarah 21 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dual inoculation of pea plants significantly increased the plant biomass, photosynthetic rate, nodulation, and nitrogen fixation activity in comparison with single inoculation with Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viceae strain D 293”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–764 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Coinoculation significantly increased pea tissue phosphorus content and acid phosphatase activity.

Treatment
coinoculatione0
Outcome
total phosphorus content in plant tissue, acid phosphatase activitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“coinoculation significantly increased the total phosphorus content in plant tissue, acid phosphatase activity and percentage of root colonization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–930 · show in text ↑
t0

“pea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Coinoculation significantly increased the percentage of pea root colonization.

Treatment
coinoculatione0
Outcome
percentage of root colonizatione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“coinoculation significantly increased the total phosphorus content in plant tissue, acid phosphatase activity and percentage of root colonization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–930 · show in text ↑
t0

“pea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium and Glomus mosseae coinoculation was more effective at low phosphorus.

Treatment
coinoculation with Rhizobium leguminosarum and Glomus mosseaee0
Interactor
Rhizobium leguminosarumRhizobium leguminosarume0symbiont
Second interactor
Glomus mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
effectivenesse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
low phosphorus levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium leguminosarum
Rhizobium leguminosarum · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryQaswarah 21 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effectiveness of coinoculation with Rhizobium leguminosarum and Glomus mosseae was higher at the low phosphorus level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1053 · show in text ↑
t0

“pea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomus intraradices coinoculation appeared most effective at higher phosphorus.

Treatment
coinoculation with Glomus intraradicese0
Interactor
Glomus intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese0symbiont
Outcome
most effectivee0
Direction
most effectivee0
Qualifier
higher phosphorus levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the coinoculation with Glomus intraradices appeared to be the most effective at higher phosphorus level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1163 · show in text ↑
t0

“pea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–39 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Rhizobium leguminosarum · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ

17 papers: 11 positive, 6 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

inoculation · disease · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 18 positive, 24 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

inoculation · soil: biology · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.