Paper · 2009 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Effects of Molybdenum, Nickel, and Nitrogen Sources on the Mineral Nutrition and Growth of Rice Plants

Milton Ferreira Moraes; André Rodrigues Reis; Larissa Alexandra C. Moraes; et al.

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
18
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

Upland rice plants, cultivar ‘IAC 202,’ were grown in nutrient solution until full tillering. Treatments consisted of ammonium nitrate (AN) or urea (UR) as nitrogen (N) source plus molybdenum (Mo) and/or nickel (Ni): AN + Mo + Ni, AN + Mo − Ni, AN − Mo + Ni, UR + Mo + Ni, UR + Mo − Ni, and UR − Mo + Ni. The experiment was carried out to better understand the effect of these treatments on dry‐matter yield, chlorophyll, net photosynthesis rate, nitrate (NO3 −‐N), total N, in vitro activities of urease and nitrate reductase (NR), and Mo and Ni concentrations. In UR‐grown plants, Mo and Ni addition increased yield of dry matter. Regardless of the N source, chlorophyll concentration and net photosynthesis rate were reduced when Mo or Ni were omitted, although not always significantly. The omission of either Mo or Ni led to a decrease in urease activity, independent of N source. Nitrate reductase activity increased in nutrient solutions without Mo, although NO3 −‐N increased. There was not a consistent variation in total N concentration. Molybdenum and Ni concentration in roots and shoots were influenced by their supply in the nutrient solution. Molybdenum concentration was not influenced by N sources, whereas Ni content in both root and shoots was greater in ammonium nitrate–grown plants. In conclusion, it can be hypothesized that there is a relationship between Mo and Ni acting on photosynthesis, although is an indirect one. This is the first evidence for a beneficial effect of Mo and Ni interaction on plant growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mo and Ni addition increased dry-matter yield in urea-grown rice.

Treatment
Mo and Ni additione0
Outcome
yield of dry mattere0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“In UR‐grown plants, Mo and Ni addition increased yield of dry matter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–632 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting Mo or Ni reduced chlorophyll concentration and net photosynthesis rate regardless of N source, though not always significantly.

Treatment
Mo or Ni were omittede0
Outcome
chlorophyll concentration and net photosynthesis ratee0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
although not always significantlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“Regardless of the N source, chlorophyll concentration and net photosynthesis rate were reduced when Mo or Ni were omitted, although not always significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–790 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Omitting either Mo or Ni decreased urease activity independently of N source.

Treatment
omission of either Mo or Nie0
Outcome
urease activitye0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“The omission of either Mo or Ni led to a decrease in urease activity, independent of N source.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–885 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate reductase activity increased without Mo.

Treatment
without Moe0
Outcome
Nitrate reductase activitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“Nitrate reductase activity increased in nutrient solutions without Mo, although NO3 −‐N increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–984 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NO3 −‐N increased in nutrient solutions without Mo.

Treatment
without Moe0
Outcome
NO3 −‐Ne0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“Nitrate reductase activity increased in nutrient solutions without Mo, although NO3 −‐N increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–984 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total N concentration did not vary consistently.

Outcome
total N concentratione0
Direction
not a consistent variatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“There was not a consistent variation in total N concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1047 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root and shoot Mo and Ni concentrations responded to their supply in nutrient solution.

Treatment
their supply in the nutrient solutione0
Outcome
Molybdenum and Ni concentration in roots and shootse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“Molybdenum and Ni concentration in roots and shoots were influenced by their supply in the nutrient solution.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1157 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mo concentration was not influenced by N source.

Treatment
N sourcese0
Outcome
Molybdenum concentratione0
Direction
not influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“Molybdenum concentration was not influenced by N sources”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1214 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root and shoot Ni content was greater with ammonium nitrate than the other N source.

Treatment
ammonium nitratee0
Outcome
Ni content in both root and shootse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
ureae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“Ni content in both root and shoots was greater in ammonium nitrate–grown plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1303 · show in text ↑
e1

“ammonium nitrate (AN) or urea (UR) as nitrogen (N) source”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–175 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors hypothesize an indirect Mo–Ni relationship affecting photosynthesis.

Outcome
photosynthesise0
Qualifier
relationship between Mo and Nie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“it can be hypothesized that there is a relationship between Mo and Ni acting on photosynthesis, although is an indirect one”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1443 · show in text ↑

nickel atom · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

nickel atom · physiology: photosynthesis · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

molybdenum atom · physiology: photosynthesis · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

molybdenum atom · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.