Paper · 1990 · Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Response of thinned, immature lodgepole pine to nitrogen and boron fertilization

R. P. Brockley

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
37
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A study was undertaken to investigate the effects of nitrogen and boron, applied singly and in combination, on the growth of young, thinned lodgepole pine in the interior of British Columbia. Results indicate that subacute boron deficiencies without visible growth disturbance symptoms, may reduce the nitrogen fertilization response potential of lodgepole pine. Combined nitrogen and boron application significantly improved the 3-year mean height and volume increment over that obtained with nitrogen alone. Relatively small boron additions (i.e., 1.5 and 3.0 kg boron•ha −1 ) to the soil surface elevated foliar boron concentrations and maintained them throughout the 3-year study period. No toxic effects of boron application on foliage were observed. Both 1st-year fascicle weight response and 2nd-year branch elongation proved to be reliable indicators of subsequent stem volume response. The slightly larger stem growth response obtained with a complete fertilizer treatment, when combined with needle weight and foliar analysis data, indicates that nitrogen and nitrogen plus boron treatments may have induced a marginal sulphur deficiency. Because boron deficiency symptoms can develop rapidly following an interruption in boron uptake, and because top dieback can have such an adverse effect on stem quality and value, it is recommended that boron be added to nitrogenous fertilizer when undertaking aerial fertilization projects in lodgepole pine forests where average foliar boron concentrations are below 15 ppm.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subacute boron deficiency may reduce nitrogen fertilizer response.

Taxon
lodgepole pinePinus contortae0
Compound
borone0
Outcome
nitrogen fertilization response potentiale0
Direction
reducee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“subacute boron deficiencies without visible growth disturbance symptoms, may reduce the nitrogen fertilization response potential of lodgepole pine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–361 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined nitrogen and boron significantly improved 3-year mean height increment versus nitrogen alone.

Taxon
lodgepole pinePinus contortat0
Treatment
Combined nitrogen and boron applicatione0
Outcome
3-year mean heighte0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
nitrogen alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combined nitrogen and boron application significantly improved the 3-year mean height and volume increment over that obtained with nitrogen alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 363–508 · show in text ↑
t0

“lodgepole pine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined nitrogen and boron significantly improved 3-year mean volume increment versus nitrogen alone.

Taxon
lodgepole pinePinus contortat0
Treatment
Combined nitrogen and boron applicatione0
Outcome
volume incremente0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
nitrogen alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combined nitrogen and boron application significantly improved the 3-year mean height and volume increment over that obtained with nitrogen alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 363–508 · show in text ↑
t0

“lodgepole pine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron additions elevated and maintained foliar boron concentrations for 3 years.

Taxon
lodgepole pinePinus contortat0
Treatment
1.5 and 3.0 kg boron•ha −1e0
Outcome
foliar boron concentrationse0
Direction
elevatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Relatively small boron additions (i.e., 1.5 and 3.0 kg boron•ha −1 ) to the soil surface elevated foliar boron concentrations and maintained them throughout the 3-year study period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–690 · show in text ↑
t0

“lodgepole pine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No foliar toxicity was observed after boron application.

Taxon
lodgepole pinePinus contortat0
Treatment
boron applicatione0
Outcome
toxic effectse0
Direction
Noe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No toxic effects of boron application on foliage were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–754 · show in text ↑
t0

“lodgepole pine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–44 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

First-year fascicle weight and second-year branch elongation predicted later stem volume response.

Taxon
lodgepole pinePinus contortat0
Organ / stage
fasciclee0
Outcome
subsequent stem volume responsee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both 1st-year fascicle weight response and 2nd-year branch elongation proved to be reliable indicators of subsequent stem volume response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–893 · show in text ↑
t0

“lodgepole pine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Complete fertilizer produced a slightly larger stem growth response.

Taxon
lodgepole pinePinus contortat0
Treatment
complete fertilizer treatmente0
Outcome
stem growth responsee0
Direction
slightly largere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The slightly larger stem growth response obtained with a complete fertilizer treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–981 · show in text ↑
t0

“lodgepole pine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–44 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen and nitrogen plus boron may have induced marginal sulphur deficiency.

Taxon
lodgepole pinePinus contortat0
Treatment
nitrogen and nitrogen plus boron treatmentse0
Outcome
marginal sulphur deficiencye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen and nitrogen plus boron treatments may have induced a marginal sulphur deficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1147 · show in text ↑
t0

“lodgepole pine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–44 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend boron with nitrogenous fertilizer where foliar boron is below 15 ppm.

Taxon
lodgepole pinePinus contortae0
Outcome
boron be added to nitrogenous fertilizere0
Qualifier
below 15 ppme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it is recommended that boron be added to nitrogenous fertilizer when undertaking aerial fertilization projects in lodgepole pine forests where average foliar boron concentrations are below 15 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1524 · show in text ↑

boron atom · growth · Pinus contorta (lodgepole pine)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Pinus contorta (lodgepole pine)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · growth · Pinus contorta (lodgepole pine)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.