Paper · 1969 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

GROWTH, METABOLIC COMPONENTS AND DROUGHT SURVIVAL OF LODGEPOLE PINE SEEDLINGS AT THREE NITRATE LEVELS

Harold M. Etter

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl. var. latifolia) seedlings were grown for six weeks in a controlled environment using nutrient solutions containing 0.4, 4.0 or 8.0 meq/liter nitrate-N. Increased nitrate supply resulted in plants with smaller root/leaf weight ratios and higher moisture contents in the leaves. Increased nitrate also brought about decreases in the soluble carbohydrate and starch contents of the leaves and roots; these changes were associated with higher amino-N and insoluble protein contents, especially in the leaves, but lower soluble protein contents. The results support the hypothesis that increasing the nitrate supply altered the metabolism of the seedlings by increasing the competition for reductant in the plants.Drought survival was assessed by the extent of new root growth following a period of drought and recovery. Seedlings grown at the highest nitrate level had the lowest survival when the three treatments were held without watering for a two-week period. However, nitrate level altered drought survival less if the three treatments were stressed to the same final moisture content in the growth medium.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrate reduced root to leaf weight ratios.

Taxon
Lodgepole pinePinus contortat0
Treatment
Increased nitrate supplye0
Outcome
root/leaf weight ratiose0
Direction
smallere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increased nitrate supply resulted in plants with smaller root/leaf weight ratios and higher moisture contents in the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 190–313 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lodgepole pine”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 53–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrate increased leaf moisture content.

Taxon
Lodgepole pinePinus contortat0
Treatment
Increased nitrate supplye0
Outcome
moisture contents in the leavese0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increased nitrate supply resulted in plants with smaller root/leaf weight ratios and higher moisture contents in the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 190–313 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lodgepole pine”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 53–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrate reduced soluble carbohydrate and starch in leaves and roots.

Taxon
Lodgepole pinePinus contortat0
Treatment
Increased nitratee0
Outcome
soluble carbohydrate and starch contents of the leaves and rootse0
Direction
decreasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increased nitrate also brought about decreases in the soluble carbohydrate and starch contents of the leaves and roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–433 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lodgepole pine”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 53–67 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrate was associated with higher amino nitrogen and insoluble protein, especially in leaves.

Taxon
Lodgepole pinePinus contortat0
Treatment
Increased nitratet1
Outcome
amino-N and insoluble protein contentse0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these changes were associated with higher amino-N and insoluble protein contents, especially in the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–541 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lodgepole pine”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 53–67 · show in text ↑
t1

“Increased nitrate also brought about”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–351 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrate was associated with lower soluble protein.

Taxon
Lodgepole pinePinus contortat0
Treatment
Increased nitratet1
Outcome
soluble protein contentse0
Direction
lowere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but lower soluble protein contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–577 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lodgepole pine”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 53–67 · show in text ↑
t1

“Increased nitrate also brought about”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–351 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Highest nitrate gave lowest survival after two weeks without water.

Taxon
Lodgepole pinePinus contortat0
Treatment
highest nitrate levele0
Outcome
survivale0
Direction
loweste0
Qualifier
without watering for a two-week periode0
Comparator
three treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedlings grown at the highest nitrate level had the lowest survival when the three treatments were held without watering for a two-week period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–997 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lodgepole pine”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 53–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate affected drought survival less when all treatments reached the same final medium moisture.

Taxon
Lodgepole pinePinus contortat0
Treatment
nitrate levele0
Outcome
drought survivale0
Direction
lesse0
Qualifier
same final moisture content in the growth mediume0
Comparator
three treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrate level altered drought survival less if the three treatments were stressed to the same final moisture content in the growth medium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1145 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lodgepole pine”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 53–67 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · survival · Pinus contorta (lodgepole pine)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Pinus contorta (lodgepole pine)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.