Abstract
Abstract Pre‐harvest spraying of orchard trees with aminoethoxyvinylglycine (AVG) suppressed ethylene production in apples at picking and during barn storage. Fruit firmness was not affected at harvest, but the fruit softened more slowly and remained greener longer after picking. Changes in volatile aroma components were noted and autocatalytic stimulation of ethylene was not possible. AVG did not reduce the acceptability of the fruit at harvest time: subsequently an increased preference for fruits from unsprayed trees was shown by a sensory assessment panel.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
AVG spraying suppressed apple ethylene production at picking and during barn storage.
- Taxon
- apples
Malus domesticae0 - Organ / stage
- applese0
- Treatment
- Pre‐harvest spraying of orchard trees with aminoethoxyvinylglycine (AVG)e0
- Outcome
- ethylene productione0
- Direction
- suppressede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Pre‐harvest spraying of orchard trees with aminoethoxyvinylglycine (AVG) suppressed ethylene production in apples at picking and during barn storage.”
Claim · model-written summary
AVG did not affect fruit firmness at harvest.
- Taxon
- apples
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- AVGe1
- Outcome
- Fruit firmnesse0
- Direction
- not affectede0
- Qualifier
- at harveste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Fruit firmness was not affected at harvest”
t0“apples”
t1“apples”
e1“Pre‐harvest spraying of orchard trees with aminoethoxyvinylglycine (AVG) suppressed ethylene production in apples at picking and during barn storage.”
Claim · model-written summary
AVG-treated fruit softened more slowly after picking.
- Taxon
- apples
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- AVGe1
- Outcome
- fruit softenede0
- Direction
- more slowlye0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the fruit softened more slowly”
t0“apples”
t1“apples”
e1“Pre‐harvest spraying of orchard trees with aminoethoxyvinylglycine (AVG) suppressed ethylene production in apples at picking and during barn storage.”
Claim · model-written summary
AVG-treated fruit remained greener longer after picking.
- Taxon
- apples
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- AVGe1
- Outcome
- greenere0
- Direction
- longere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“remained greener longer after picking”
t0“apples”
t1“apples”
e1“Pre‐harvest spraying of orchard trees with aminoethoxyvinylglycine (AVG) suppressed ethylene production in apples at picking and during barn storage.”
Claim · model-written summary
AVG altered volatile aroma components.
- Taxon
- apples
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- AVGe1
- Outcome
- volatile aroma componentse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Changes in volatile aroma components were noted”
t0“apples”
t1“apples”
e1“Pre‐harvest spraying of orchard trees with aminoethoxyvinylglycine (AVG) suppressed ethylene production in apples at picking and during barn storage.”
Claim · model-written summary
Autocatalytic stimulation of ethylene was not possible after AVG treatment.
- Taxon
- apples
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- AVGe1
- Outcome
- autocatalytic stimulation of ethylenee0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“autocatalytic stimulation of ethylene was not possible”
t0“apples”
t1“apples”
e1“Pre‐harvest spraying of orchard trees with aminoethoxyvinylglycine (AVG) suppressed ethylene production in apples at picking and during barn storage.”
Claim · model-written summary
AVG did not reduce fruit acceptability at harvest.
- Taxon
- apples
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- AVGe0
- Outcome
- acceptability of the fruite0
- Direction
- did not reducee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“AVG did not reduce the acceptability of the fruit at harvest time”
t0“apples”
Claim · model-written summary
A sensory panel later preferred fruit from unsprayed trees.
- Taxon
- apples
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- AVGe1
- Outcome
- preferencee0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- unsprayed treese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“subsequently an increased preference for fruits from unsprayed trees was shown by a sensory assessment panel.”
t0“apples”
t1“apples”
e1“Pre‐harvest spraying of orchard trees with aminoethoxyvinylglycine (AVG) suppressed ethylene production in apples at picking and during barn storage.”
The same questions in other papers
application · physiology: hormones · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- negative
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.