Paper · 2014 · International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Biotechnology

Influence of Soil and Foliar Applied Boron on Green Gram in Calcareous Soils

Rajeev Padbhushan; Dinesh Kumar

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
35
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A greenhouse experiment with green gram grown on boron (B) deficient calcareous soils was conducted for two years in Northwest India to study the influence of soil and foliar applied boron on green gram. Three soils with calcium carbonate content 0.75 (Soil I), 2.1 (Soil II) and 4.56 (Soil III) percent were collected from different sites of Ludhiana and Bhatinda districts, Punjab, India. The treatments comprised of four levels of soil applied boron viz. 0.5, 0.75, 1.0 and 1.5 mg B kg−1 and two levels of foliar applied boron viz. 0.1 and 0.2 per cent borax solution with common control. Soil applied boron has more influence on mean dry matter yield while foliar applied boron has on mean grain yield. Among all soil applied boron 0.5 mg kg−1 is best treatment while 0.1% is best foliar treatment. Soil applied boron was at the par with foliar applied boron. Among all three calcareous soils, Soil I with lower calcium carbonate was best soil in respect of mean yield and yield components in comparison to Soil II and Soil III. Combined effect of boron level and soils had a significant effect on yield and yield attributing characters. Total seed weight and leaf boron content are highly correlated with one another.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil boron had greater influence on dry matter yield.

Treatment
Soil applied borone0
Outcome
mean dry matter yielde0
Direction
more influencee0
Comparator
foliar applied borone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Green Gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“Soil applied boron has more influence on mean dry matter yield while foliar applied boron has on mean grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–705 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar boron had greater influence on grain yield.

Treatment
foliar applied borone0
Outcome
mean grain yielde0
Direction
more influencee0
Comparator
Soil applied borone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Green Gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“Soil applied boron has more influence on mean dry matter yield while foliar applied boron has on mean grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–705 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The best soil boron treatment was 0.5 mg kg−1.

Treatment
0.5 mg kg−1e0
Outcome
best treatmente0
Direction
beste0
Comparator
all soil applied borone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Green Gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“Among all soil applied boron 0.5 mg kg−1 is best treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–765 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The best foliar boron treatment was 0.1%.

Treatment
0.1%e0
Outcome
best foliar treatmente0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Green Gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“0.1% is best foliar treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–801 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil boron application performed at par with foliar application.

Treatment
Soil applied borone0
Outcome
at the pare0
Comparator
foliar applied borone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Green Gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“Soil applied boron was at the par with foliar applied boron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–862 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil I performed best for mean yield and yield components compared with soils II and III.

Outcome
mean yield and yield componentse0
Direction
beste0
Comparator
Soil II and Soil IIIe0
Setting
Soil Ie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Green Gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“Soil I with lower calcium carbonate was best soil in respect of mean yield and yield components in comparison to Soil II and Soil III”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–1031 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron level and soil jointly affected yield and yield traits significantly.

Treatment
boron levele0
Outcome
yield and yield attributing characterse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Green Gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“Combined effect of boron level and soils had a significant effect on yield and yield attributing characters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1140 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total seed weight and leaf boron content were highly correlated.

Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
Total seed weighte0
Qualifier
leaf boron contente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Green Gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–56 · show in text ↑
e0

“Total seed weight and leaf boron content are highly correlated with one another”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1221 · show in text ↑

boron atom · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

31 papers: 31 positive, 0 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

application · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

216 papers: 209 positive, 7 negative or no effect

208 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

212 papers more in this group

See all 216 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.