Paper · 2012 · Advanced materials research

Study on Nitrogen Utilization Efficiency of Flue-Cured Tobacco with 15N Tracing Technique

Mao Mao Hou; Xiao Hou Shao; Li Hua Chen; et al.

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract. Raising nitrogen utilization efficiency could not only cut the fertilizer costs, but also reduce the N loss and residual, which benefits a lot to agricultural production and environmental protection. In this experiment, the 15N tracing technique was employed in order to clear the accumulation and whereabouts of fertilizer N in flue-cured tobacco plants, besides, the tobaccos were treated by six different water-nitrogen modes, for the sake of finding out the best design with the highest nitrogen utilization efficiency. The results showed that more N application contributed to more fertilizer N accumulation, also increased the content of total N; Excess irrigation restrained the tobacco plants' absorption of fertilizer N, ultimately leading to the low utilization efficiency of nitrogen fertilizer; After apex pruning, the N offering ability of the soil was much stronger than that of nitrogen fertilizer, and the fertilizer N accounts a relatively small part for the total N in tobacco plants, the highest nitrogen utilization efficiency was 24.16%, recorded in the design of 800mm irrigation amount and 6g/plant pure N application(T2), Meanwhile, the agronomic characters and crop yield was observed, tobaccos in T2 design performed better than the average level of field-cultivated tobaccos, the conclusions could be obtained that T2 design was preferable, which achieved the highest nitrogen utilization efficiency when ensured the normal growth and good harvest of flue-cured tobacco.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More N application contributed to more fertilizer N accumulation in flue-cured tobacco.

Taxon
Flue-Cured Tobaccot0
Treatment
N applicatione0
Outcome
fertilizer N accumulatione0
Direction
contributed to moree0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Flue-Cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“more N application contributed to more fertilizer N accumulation, also increased the content of total N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More N application increased the content of total N in flue-cured tobacco.

Taxon
Flue-Cured Tobaccot0
Treatment
N applicatione0
Outcome
content of total Ne0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Flue-Cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“more N application contributed to more fertilizer N accumulation, also increased the content of total N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Excess irrigation restrained absorption of fertilizer N by flue-cured tobacco, leading to low nitrogen fertilizer utilization efficiency.

Taxon
Flue-Cured Tobaccot0
Treatment
Excess irrigatione1
Outcome
absorption of fertilizer Ne1
Direction
restrainede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Flue-Cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“Excess irrigation restrained the tobacco plants' absorption of fertilizer N, ultimately leading to the low utilization efficiency of nitrogen fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–815 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After apex pruning, the soil N offering ability was much stronger than that of nitrogen fertilizer.

Taxon
Flue-Cured Tobaccot0
Treatment
After apex pruninge2
Outcome
N offering ability of the soile2
Direction
much strongere2
Comparator
nitrogen fertilizere2

Verbatim

t0

“Flue-Cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–62 · show in text ↑
e2

“After apex pruning, the N offering ability of the soil was much stronger than that of nitrogen fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–922 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer N accounts for a relatively small part of total N in tobacco plants.

Taxon
tobacco plantsNicotiana tabacume3
Outcome
fertilizer N accounts a relatively small part for the total Ne3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“the fertilizer N accounts a relatively small part for the total N in tobacco plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1011 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 800 mm irrigation and 6 g per plant pure N application design gave the highest nitrogen utilization efficiency, 24.16%.

Taxon
Flue-Cured Tobaccot0
Treatment
800mm irrigation amount and 6g/plant pure N applicatione4
Outcome
nitrogen utilization efficiencye4
Direction
higheste4
Value
24.16%e4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Flue-Cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–62 · show in text ↑
e4

“the highest nitrogen utilization efficiency was 24.16%, recorded in the design of 800mm irrigation amount and 6g/plant pure N application(T2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T2 design tobacco performed better than the average level of field-cultivated tobacco in agronomic characters and crop yield.

Taxon
Flue-Cured Tobaccot0
Treatment
T2 designe5
Outcome
agronomic characters and crop yielde5
Direction
performed bettere5
Comparator
average level of field-cultivated tobaccose5

Verbatim

t0

“Flue-Cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–62 · show in text ↑
e5

“Meanwhile, the agronomic characters and crop yield was observed, tobaccos in T2 design performed better than the average level of field-cultivated tobaccos”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1311 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The T2 design is preferable for flue-cured tobacco because it gives the highest nitrogen utilization efficiency while ensuring normal growth and good harvest.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccoe6
Outcome
T2 design was preferablee6

Verbatim

e6

“the conclusions could be obtained that T2 design was preferable, which achieved the highest nitrogen utilization efficiency when ensured the normal growth and good harvest of flue-cured tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1506 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

irrigation · nutrient: content · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 8 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 32 positive, 10 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.