Paper · 2012 · WIT transactions on ecology and the environment

Effects of deficit irrigation on yield and water use of grown cucumbers in Saudi Arabia

A. M. Alomran; I. I. Luki

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Deficit irrigation can play an important role in increasing water use efficiency (WUE) and reduced amount of irrigation. Deficit irrigation generally refers to fully irrigated crops where water is reduced or withheld during certain growth stages. In this study, a series of greenhouse and open field experiments were conducted using a deficit irrigation program on cucumber crops under drip irrigation during 2007-2010 growing seasons. The layout of the experiment was a completely randomized design with four replicates. Irrigation treatments consisted of five levels of ETc (30, 40, 60, 80, and 100% of ETc) in addition to traditional practice by farmers. At 60 and 80% treatments, deficit irrigation tested at different growth stages (development, med, and late stages of the growth) for a total of 14 treatments at each experiment. The maximum amount of water applied to the crop was 332 mm for the 100%ETc treatment while the minimum water applied was 100 mm for 30%Etc treatment, and 600 mm for traditional practice by the farmers in the region. The calculated ETc ranged from between 95 and 316 mm for the different treatments. The objective of the study was to determine the crop water requirements in both the open field and greenhouse and calculate crop response factor (ky) and WUE of cucumber crop using a deficit irrigation program at different stages of growth. Results indicated that a cucumber could stand the shortage of water during the growth and crop response (Ky) values ranging between 0.7 and 0.98. However, the amount of water used was much lower than that of the traditional method used by farmers in the region. Water use efficiency (WUE) and water productivity (WP) values increased when water amounts decreased with the exception of the traditional irrigation; these values decreased to 45.6 and 24 kg/m 3 , respectively. The highest values at much stressed treatment 30% ETc.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cucumber could withstand a shortage of water during growth.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse2
Outcome
could stand the shortage of watere2
Qualifier
during the growthe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Results indicated that a cucumber could stand the shortage of water during the growth and crop response (Ky) values ranging between 0.7 and 0.98”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1376–1520 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cucumber crop response factor Ky ranged between 0.7 and 0.98.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse2
Outcome
crop response (Ky)e2
Value
between 0.7 and 0.98e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Results indicated that a cucumber could stand the shortage of water during the growth and crop response (Ky) values ranging between 0.7 and 0.98”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1376–1520 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The calculated crop water use ETc ranged between 95 and 316 mm across the treatments.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Outcome
calculated ETce3
Value
between 95 and 316 mme3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“deficit irrigation program on cucumber crops under drip irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–401 · show in text ↑
e3

“The calculated ETc ranged from between 95 and 316 mm for the different treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation used much less water than the traditional farmer method in the region.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
deficit irrigation programe1
Outcome
amount of water usede4
Direction
much lowere4
Comparator
the traditional method used by farmers in the regione4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“deficit irrigation program on cucumber crops under drip irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–401 · show in text ↑
e4

“However, the amount of water used was much lower than that of the traditional method used by farmers in the region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1522–1636 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water use efficiency and water productivity increased when water amounts were decreased.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
water amounts decreasede5
Outcome
Water use efficiency (WUE) and water productivity (WP)e5
Direction
increasede5
Qualifier
with the exception of the traditional irrigatione5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“deficit irrigation program on cucumber crops under drip irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–401 · show in text ↑
e5

“Water use efficiency (WUE) and water productivity (WP) values increased when water amounts decreased with the exception of the traditional irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1638–1787 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under traditional irrigation, water use efficiency decreased to 45.6.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
traditional irrigatione5
Outcome
Water use efficiency (WUE)e5
Direction
decreasede6
Value
45.6e6
Comparator
water amounts decreasede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“deficit irrigation program on cucumber crops under drip irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–401 · show in text ↑
e5

“Water use efficiency (WUE) and water productivity (WP) values increased when water amounts decreased with the exception of the traditional irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1638–1787 · show in text ↑
e6

“these values decreased to 45.6 and 24 kg/m 3 , respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1789–1848 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under traditional irrigation, water productivity decreased to 24 kg/m 3.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
traditional irrigatione5
Outcome
water productivity (WP)e5
Direction
decreasede6
Value
24 kg/m 3e6
Comparator
water amounts decreasede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“deficit irrigation program on cucumber crops under drip irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–401 · show in text ↑
e5

“Water use efficiency (WUE) and water productivity (WP) values increased when water amounts decreased with the exception of the traditional irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1638–1787 · show in text ↑
e6

“these values decreased to 45.6 and 24 kg/m 3 , respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1789–1848 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water use efficiency and water productivity were highest at 30% ETc, the most stressed treatment.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
30% ETce7
Outcome
The highest valuese7
Direction
higheste7
Qualifier
much stressed treatmente7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“deficit irrigation program on cucumber crops under drip irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–401 · show in text ↑
e7

“The highest values at much stressed treatment 30% ETc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1850–1903 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: water · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 22 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.