Paper · 2007 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

Irrigation and fertilizer management effects on processing cucumber productivity and water use efficiency

R. P. Beyaert; R. C. Roy; B. R. Ball Coelho

11
claims
25
verbatim quotes
21
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Experiments were conducted to evaluate the response of processing cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) to irrigation and fertilization strategies on a loamy sand in southwestern Ontario from 2001 to 2003. Dry matter accumulation, fruit yield, economic returns and water use efficiency were compared for (a) non-irrigated with conventional broadcast fertilizer applications (NI/B), (b) overhead sprinkler irrigated with conventional broadcast fertilizer applications (OHI/B), (c) surface drip irrigated with fertigation (DI/F) and (d) subsurface drip irrigated with fertigation (SDI/F). All irrigation methods enhanced yields, with drip irrigation coupled with fertigation showing significant advantages in terms of yield and economic returns compared with overhead irrigation and conventional fertilization practices. Irrigation increased dry matter accumulation, fruit yield and economic returns over non-irrigated treatments in a dry year, but only DI/F and SDI/F irrigation with fertigation increased these parameters in a wet year. Irrigation water use efficiency was greatest with SDI/F in 2 of 3 yr. This study indicates that processing cucumbers in Ontario benefit from irrigation, with drip irrigation/fertigation being more beneficial than overhead sprinkler irrigation. Subsurface drip irrigation systems increase irrigation water use efficiency over sprinkler and surface drip systems when higher than average temperatures coupled with lower than average rainfall are experienced on coarse-textured soils. Key words: Irrigation, fertigation, Cucumis sativus, yield

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All irrigation methods increased cucumber yield.

Taxon
processing cucumbert0
Treatment
All irrigation methodse0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“All irrigation methods enhanced yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–617 · show in text ↑
t0

“processing cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation with fertigation improved yield relative to overhead irrigation and conventional fertilization.

Taxon
processing cucumbert0
Treatment
drip irrigation coupled with fertigatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
advantagese0
Comparator
overhead irrigation and conventional fertilization practicese0

Verbatim

e0

“drip irrigation coupled with fertigation showing significant advantages in terms of yield and economic returns compared with overhead irrigation and conventional fertilization practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–809 · show in text ↑
t0

“processing cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation with fertigation improved economic returns relative to overhead irrigation and conventional fertilization.

Taxon
processing cucumbert0
Treatment
drip irrigation coupled with fertigatione0
Outcome
economic returnse0
Direction
advantagese0
Comparator
overhead irrigation and conventional fertilization practicese0

Verbatim

e0

“drip irrigation coupled with fertigation showing significant advantages in terms of yield and economic returns compared with overhead irrigation and conventional fertilization practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–809 · show in text ↑
t0

“processing cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation increased dry matter accumulation over non-irrigated treatments in a dry year.

Taxon
processing cucumbert0
Treatment
Irrigatione0
Outcome
dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in a dry yeare0
Comparator
non-irrigated treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation increased dry matter accumulation, fruit yield and economic returns over non-irrigated treatments in a dry year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–933 · show in text ↑
t0

“processing cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation increased fruit yield over non-irrigated treatments in a dry year.

Taxon
processing cucumbert0
Treatment
Irrigatione0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in a dry yeare0
Comparator
non-irrigated treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation increased dry matter accumulation, fruit yield and economic returns over non-irrigated treatments in a dry year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–933 · show in text ↑
t0

“processing cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation increased economic returns over non-irrigated treatments in a dry year.

Taxon
processing cucumbert0
Treatment
Irrigatione0
Outcome
economic returnse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in a dry yeare0
Comparator
non-irrigated treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation increased dry matter accumulation, fruit yield and economic returns over non-irrigated treatments in a dry year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–933 · show in text ↑
t0

“processing cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DI/F and SDI/F irrigation with fertigation increased dry matter accumulation in a wet year.

Taxon
processing cucumbert0
Treatment
DI/F and SDI/F irrigation with fertigatione0
Outcome
dry matter accumulatione1
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in a wet yeare0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“only DI/F and SDI/F irrigation with fertigation increased these parameters in a wet year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1027 · show in text ↑
e1

“dry matter accumulation, fruit yield and economic returns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–889 · show in text ↑
t0

“processing cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DI/F and SDI/F irrigation with fertigation increased fruit yield in a wet year.

Taxon
processing cucumbert0
Treatment
DI/F and SDI/F irrigation with fertigatione0
Outcome
fruit yielde1
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in a wet yeare0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“only DI/F and SDI/F irrigation with fertigation increased these parameters in a wet year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1027 · show in text ↑
e1

“dry matter accumulation, fruit yield and economic returns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–889 · show in text ↑
t0

“processing cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DI/F and SDI/F irrigation with fertigation increased economic returns in a wet year.

Taxon
processing cucumbert0
Treatment
DI/F and SDI/F irrigation with fertigatione0
Outcome
economic returnse1
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in a wet yeare0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“only DI/F and SDI/F irrigation with fertigation increased these parameters in a wet year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1027 · show in text ↑
e1

“dry matter accumulation, fruit yield and economic returns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–889 · show in text ↑
t0

“processing cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SDI/F had the greatest irrigation water use efficiency in two of three years.

Taxon
processing cucumbert0
Treatment
SDI/Fe0
Outcome
Irrigation water use efficiencye0
Direction
greateste0
Value
2 of 3 yre0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation water use efficiency was greatest with SDI/F in 2 of 3 yr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1097 · show in text ↑
t0

“processing cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–67 · show in text ↑
Recommendationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsurface drip irrigation increases water use efficiency over sprinkler and surface drip irrigation under hot and dry conditions on coarse soils.

Taxon
processing cucumbert0
Treatment
Subsurface drip irrigation systemse0
Outcome
irrigation water use efficiencye0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
when higher than average temperatures coupled with lower than average rainfall are experienced on coarse-textured soilse0
Comparator
sprinkler and surface drip systemse0

Verbatim

e0

“Subsurface drip irrigation systems increase irrigation water use efficiency over sprinkler and surface drip systems when higher than average temperatures coupled with lower than average rainfall are experienced on coarse-textured soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1508 · show in text ↑
t0

“processing cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–67 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: water · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 22 positive, 5 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

irrigation · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

71 papers: 53 positive, 18 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

288 papers: 263 positive, 25 negative or no effect

262 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

284 papers more in this group

See all 288 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.