Paper · 2014 · Genetika

Yield and nutritional quality of greenhouse lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) as affected by genotype and production methods

Aleksandra Govedarica-Lucic; Mirjana Mojevic; Goran Perkovic; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
9
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Greenhouse experiments were conducted in winter growing seasons in order to evaluate the effects of genotype and production methods on yield and nutritional quality of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). A three-year (2009-2011) study was conducted by randomized block system in a greenhouse without additional heating. The trial included three genotypes of lettuce (Archimedes RZ, Santoro RZ, Kibou RZ). Each row with these genotypes was exposed to the following variants of covering: control-planting on bare soil, mulching before sowing with PE-black foil, agro textile-covering plants after planting with agro textile (17 g), a combination of mulching + agro textile. Throughout of all the three years of the trial, it was continuously evidenced that the genotype ?Santoro RZ? had the biggest heads and the highest yield (15.33 kg 10 m-2), which leads to conclusion that the yield of lettuce is a genotype characteristics. Moreover, the nutritional value (ascorbic acid concentration) has shown that, depending on the method of production, in average, the combination of mulching + agro textile (26.77 mg 100 g-1) had the highest content while the control variant had significantly lower vitamin C content (21.10 mg 100 g-1). The three-year researches have shown that the production method and genotype significantly affect the nitrate content. An average nitrate content was 2196.33 mg kg-1 on the control variant, and 2526.24 mg kg-1 on agro textile. Leafy lettuce of genotyp ?Kibou RZ? had lower nitrate content (2176.85 mg kg-1) compared to ?Archimedes RZ? (2843.05 mg kg-1) and ?Santoro RZ? (2221.37 mg kg-1). However nitrate concentration in all treatments remained within the European Union?s permissible levels.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Santoro RZ lettuce had the highest yield, 15.33 kg 10 m-2, across the three years of the greenhouse trial.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Material
?Santoro RZ?e1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
15.33 kg 10 m-2e1
Qualifier
Throughout of all the three years of the triale1
Setting
Greenhousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Greenhouse experiments were conducted in winter growing seasons in order to evaluate the effects of genotype and production methods on yield and nutritional quality of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–195 · show in text ↑
e1

“Throughout of all the three years of the trial, it was continuously evidenced that the genotype ?Santoro RZ? had the biggest heads and the highest yield (15.33 kg 10 m-2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–835 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Santoro RZ lettuce had the biggest heads across the three years of the greenhouse trial.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Material
?Santoro RZ?e1
Outcome
headse1
Direction
biggeste1
Qualifier
Throughout of all the three years of the triale1
Setting
Greenhousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Greenhouse experiments were conducted in winter growing seasons in order to evaluate the effects of genotype and production methods on yield and nutritional quality of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–195 · show in text ↑
e1

“Throughout of all the three years of the trial, it was continuously evidenced that the genotype ?Santoro RZ? had the biggest heads and the highest yield (15.33 kg 10 m-2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–835 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of mulching and agro textile had the highest vitamin C content, 26.77 mg 100 g-1, and the control variant had significantly lower vitamin C content, 21.10 mg 100 g-1.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
combination of mulching + agro textilee2
Outcome
vitamin C contente2
Direction
higheste2
Value
26.77 mg 100 g-1e2
Qualifier
21.10 mg 100 g-1e2
Comparator
control variante2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Greenhouse experiments were conducted in winter growing seasons in order to evaluate the effects of genotype and production methods on yield and nutritional quality of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–195 · show in text ↑
e2

“in average, the combination of mulching + agro textile (26.77 mg 100 g-1) had the highest content while the control variant had significantly lower vitamin C content (21.10 mg 100 g-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1221 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Production method and genotype significantly affected the nitrate content of lettuce.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Material
genotypee3
Treatment
production methode3
Outcome
nitrate contente3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Greenhouse experiments were conducted in winter growing seasons in order to evaluate the effects of genotype and production methods on yield and nutritional quality of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–195 · show in text ↑
e3

“the production method and genotype significantly affect the nitrate content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1340 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lettuce grown under agro textile had a higher average nitrate content, 2526.24 mg kg-1, than under the control variant, 2196.33 mg kg-1.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
agro textilee4
Outcome
nitrate contente4
Direction
higherinferrede4
Value
2526.24 mg kg-1e4
Qualifier
2196.33 mg kg-1e4
Comparator
control variante4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Greenhouse experiments were conducted in winter growing seasons in order to evaluate the effects of genotype and production methods on yield and nutritional quality of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–195 · show in text ↑
e4

“An average nitrate content was 2196.33 mg kg-1 on the control variant, and 2526.24 mg kg-1 on agro textile”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1448 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kibou RZ lettuce had lower nitrate content, 2176.85 mg kg-1, than Archimedes RZ, 2843.05 mg kg-1.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Material
Kibou RZe5
Outcome
nitrate contente5
Direction
lowere5
Value
2176.85 mg kg-1e5
Qualifier
2843.05 mg kg-1e5
Comparator
Archimedes RZe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Greenhouse experiments were conducted in winter growing seasons in order to evaluate the effects of genotype and production methods on yield and nutritional quality of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–195 · show in text ↑
e5

“Leafy lettuce of genotyp ?Kibou RZ? had lower nitrate content (2176.85 mg kg-1) compared to ?Archimedes RZ? (2843.05 mg kg-1) and ?Santoro RZ? (2221.37 mg kg-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1610 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kibou RZ lettuce had lower nitrate content, 2176.85 mg kg-1, than Santoro RZ, 2221.37 mg kg-1.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Material
Kibou RZe5
Outcome
nitrate contente5
Direction
lowere5
Value
2176.85 mg kg-1e5
Qualifier
2221.37 mg kg-1e5
Comparator
Santoro RZe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Greenhouse experiments were conducted in winter growing seasons in order to evaluate the effects of genotype and production methods on yield and nutritional quality of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–195 · show in text ↑
e5

“Leafy lettuce of genotyp ?Kibou RZ? had lower nitrate content (2176.85 mg kg-1) compared to ?Archimedes RZ? (2843.05 mg kg-1) and ?Santoro RZ? (2221.37 mg kg-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1610 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate concentration in all treatments remained within the European Union permissible levels.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Outcome
nitrate concentratione6
Qualifier
within the European Union?s permissible levelse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Greenhouse experiments were conducted in winter growing seasons in order to evaluate the effects of genotype and production methods on yield and nutritional quality of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–195 · show in text ↑
e6

“However nitrate concentration in all treatments remained within the European Union?s permissible levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1612–1715 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that the yield of lettuce is a genotype characteristic.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Material
genotypee7
Outcome
yielde7

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Greenhouse experiments were conducted in winter growing seasons in order to evaluate the effects of genotype and production methods on yield and nutritional quality of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–195 · show in text ↑
e7

“which leads to conclusion that the yield of lettuce is a genotype characteristics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–918 · show in text ↑

mulching · quality: phytochemicals · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.