Abstract
Problem statement: This experiment was carried out for study the effects of chemical and biological fertilizers and interaction between them on some physiological characteristic and yield and its components of seed corn in two different irrigation. Approach: The experiment was conducted in a split plot factorial with completely randomized block design using four replications. Sub plots consisted of combined application levels N-fertilizer with two level (0 and 300 kg.ha -1 ) Urea and two level of biological fertilizer (0 and 4 L.ha -1 ) in four stage that was from 4th leaf appearance until milk stage. Biological fertilizer was combined of Kadostim, Phosphotern, Aminolephorte and Hyomiphorte. Main plots consisted of two period of irrigation (8 and 12 days). Results: The results showed that highest grain yield was in conditional application at integrated treatment 300 kg.ha -1 Urea fertilizer and 4 L.ha -1 biological fertilizer (12.5 ton.ha -1 ) that with compared to control treatment showed increase 257%. In this treatment decrease irrigation (12 days period of irrigation) from pollination stage to seed maturity, decreased 8.9% in yield. The highest kernel number per ear and highest 1000 kernel weight was in integrated fertilizer treatment but in 8 days period of irrigation was not significant difference between integrated treatment and chemical treatment for 1000 kernel weight. The integrated treatment in 8 days period of irrigation showed the highest CGR, NAR and LAI (14.2 g.m -2 .day - , 2.9 g.m LA -2 .day - and 5.1) respectively. And decrease 12 days period of irrigation had little effect on CGR and NAR but application of chemical fertilizer after decrease irrigation CGR had much reduce trend to compared integrated treatment. Conclusion: In conclusion for reach to high yield in corn biological fertilizer can not sufficient but integrated application of fertilizers (biological and chemical fertilizers) became causes significant increase in yield.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated fertilizers gave 12.5 ton.ha -1 grain yield, 257% above control.
- Treatment
- 300 kg.ha -1 Urea fertilizer and 4 L.ha -1 biological fertilizere0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 12.5 ton.ha -1e0
- Qualifier
- 257%e0
- Comparator
- control treatmente0
Zea maysOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Corn (Zea mays L.)”
e0“The results showed that highest grain yield was in conditional application at integrated treatment 300 kg.ha -1 Urea fertilizer and 4 L.ha -1 biological fertilizer (12.5 ton.ha -1 ) that with compared to control treatment showed increase 257%.”
Claim · model-written summary
A 12 day irrigation period reduced yield by 8.9% under integrated fertilization.
- Organ / stage
- pollination stage to seed maturitye0
- Treatment
- 12 days period of irrigatione0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Value
- 8.9%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Corn (Zea mays L.)”
e0“In this treatment decrease irrigation (12 days period of irrigation) from pollination stage to seed maturity, decreased 8.9% in yield.”
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated fertilization produced the highest kernel number per ear.
- Treatment
- integrated fertilizer treatmente0
- Outcome
- kernel number per eare0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- chemical treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Corn (Zea mays L.)”
e0“The highest kernel number per ear and highest 1000 kernel weight was in integrated fertilizer treatment but in 8 days period of irrigation was not significant difference between integrated treatment and chemical treatment for 1000 kernel weight.”
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated fertilization produced the highest 1000 kernel weight.
- Treatment
- integrated fertilizer treatmente0
- Outcome
- 1000 kernel weighte0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- chemical treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Corn (Zea mays L.)”
e0“The highest kernel number per ear and highest 1000 kernel weight was in integrated fertilizer treatment but in 8 days period of irrigation was not significant difference between integrated treatment and chemical treatment for 1000 kernel weight.”
Claim · model-written summary
At eight day irrigation, integrated and chemical fertilizer did not differ significantly in 1000 kernel weight.
- Treatment
- integrated treatmente0
- Outcome
- 1000 kernel weighte0
- Direction
- not significant differencee0
- Qualifier
- 8 days period of irrigatione0
- Comparator
- chemical treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Corn (Zea mays L.)”
e0“The highest kernel number per ear and highest 1000 kernel weight was in integrated fertilizer treatment but in 8 days period of irrigation was not significant difference between integrated treatment and chemical treatment for 1000 kernel weight.”
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated fertilizer at eight day irrigation had highest CGR of 14.2 g.m -2 .day -.
- Treatment
- integrated treatmente0
- Outcome
- CGRe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 14.2 g.m -2 .day -e0
- Qualifier
- 8 days period of irrigatione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Corn (Zea mays L.)”
e0“The integrated treatment in 8 days period of irrigation showed the highest CGR, NAR and LAI (14.2 g.m -2 .day - , 2.9 g.m LA -2 .day - and 5.1) respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated fertilizer at eight day irrigation had highest NAR of 2.9 g.m LA -2 .day -.
- Treatment
- integrated treatmente0
- Outcome
- NARe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 2.9 g.m LA -2 .day -e0
- Qualifier
- 8 days period of irrigatione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Corn (Zea mays L.)”
e0“The integrated treatment in 8 days period of irrigation showed the highest CGR, NAR and LAI (14.2 g.m -2 .day - , 2.9 g.m LA -2 .day - and 5.1) respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated fertilizer at eight day irrigation had highest LAI of 5.1.
- Treatment
- integrated treatmente0
- Outcome
- LAIe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 5.1e0
- Qualifier
- 8 days period of irrigatione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Corn (Zea mays L.)”
e0“The integrated treatment in 8 days period of irrigation showed the highest CGR, NAR and LAI (14.2 g.m -2 .day - , 2.9 g.m LA -2 .day - and 5.1) respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Extending the irrigation period to 12 days had little effect on CGR and NAR.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Corn (Zea mays L.)”
e0“And decrease 12 days period of irrigation had little effect on CGR and NAR but application of chemical fertilizer after decrease irrigation CGR had much reduce trend to compared integrated treatment.”
Claim · model-written summary
Chemical fertilizer under reduced irrigation lowered CGR relative to integrated fertilizer.
- Treatment
- chemical fertilizere0
- Outcome
- CGRe0
- Direction
- much reduce trende0
- Comparator
- integrated treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Corn (Zea mays L.)”
e0“And decrease 12 days period of irrigation had little effect on CGR and NAR but application of chemical fertilizer after decrease irrigation CGR had much reduce trend to compared integrated treatment.”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
207 papers in the same direction as this paper · 80 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
285 papers more in this group
See all 289 papers →irrigation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
790 papers in the same direction as this paper · 209 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
1,012 papers more in this group
See all 1,016 papers →fertilization · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
1,195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 149 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- no effect
1,361 papers more in this group
See all 1,365 papers →nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
2,181 papers more in this group
See all 2,185 papers →fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- negative
3,904 papers more in this group
See all 3,908 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.