Paper · 1993 · Agronomy Journal

Root Development and Nitrogen Influx of Corn Genotypes Grown under Combined Drought and Nitrogen Stresses

Bahman Eghball; Jerry W. Maranville

12
claims
22
verbatim quotes
202
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Knowledge about the interactive effects of N and drought stresses on corn ( Zea mays L.) root morphology and rate of N uptake is important for selecting drought tolerant and/or N efficient genotypes and for determining mechanisms that control root growth under stress. The objective was to study these interactions by growing three and four genotypes of known N utilization efficiency (NUE, kg grain/kg N uptake) responses in greenhouse and field experiments, respectively. Nitrogen application rates were 0, 30, 60, and 90 mg N kg −1 soil in the greenhouse and 0, 60, 120, and 180 kg N ha −1 in the field experiment. Water regimes included nonstress vs. an 8‐d water stress in the greenhouse experiment and dryland vs. irrigation in the field. Water‐regime‐by‐N‐rate interactions were not significant for root dry weight, length, average radius, root/shoot ratio, and N influx in either environment. Root weight and length were different among genotypes. The genotype with the greatest amount of roots deep in the soil had the highest grain yield increase with irrigation. Root mass and root length were greater, but mean N influx was two to three times smaller in the zero N treatment than in the applied N treatments (average of all genotypes). Severe water stress reduced corn root mass and length in the greenhouse. Moderate water stress in the field, however, significantly increased root length. Water use efficiency was positively correlated with root mass and length in the greenhouse. Water regime did not affect N influx in either experiment. These results showed that corn response to irrigation will be altered depending on root morphology, and that insofar as possible, the root system should be considered when selecting for N efficient and/or drought tolerant corn genotypes

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water-regime-by-N-rate interactions were not significant for root dry weight, length and average radius in either environment.

Treatment
Water‐regime‐by‐N‐rate interactionse0
Outcome
root dry weight, length, average radiuse0
Direction
not significante0
Setting
either environmente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water‐regime‐by‐N‐rate interactions were not significant for root dry weight, length, average radius, root/shoot ratio, and N influx in either environment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–908 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water-regime-by-N-rate interactions were not significant for root/shoot ratio and N influx in either environment.

Treatment
Water‐regime‐by‐N‐rate interactionse0
Outcome
root/shoot ratio, and N influxe0
Direction
not significante0
Setting
either environmente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water‐regime‐by‐N‐rate interactions were not significant for root dry weight, length, average radius, root/shoot ratio, and N influx in either environment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–908 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–54 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root weight and root length differed among corn genotypes.

Outcome
Root weight and lengthe0
Qualifier
different among genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root weight and length were different among genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–963 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–54 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The corn genotype with the greatest amount of roots deep in the soil had the highest grain yield increase with irrigation.

Material
genotype with the greatest amount of roots deep in the soile0
Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
grain yield increasee0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The genotype with the greatest amount of roots deep in the soil had the highest grain yield increase with irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1081 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root mass and root length of corn were greater in the zero N treatment than in the applied N treatments.

Treatment
zero N treatmente0
Outcome
Root mass and root lengthe0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
applied N treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root mass and root length were greater, but mean N influx was two to three times smaller in the zero N treatment than in the applied N treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1228 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean N influx of corn was two to three times smaller in the zero N treatment than in the applied N treatments.

Treatment
zero N treatmente0
Outcome
mean N influxe0
Direction
smallere0
Value
two to three timese0
Comparator
applied N treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root mass and root length were greater, but mean N influx was two to three times smaller in the zero N treatment than in the applied N treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1228 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe water stress reduced corn root mass and length in the greenhouse.

Treatment
Severe water stresse0
Outcome
root mass and lengthe0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
greenhousee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Severe water stress reduced corn root mass and length in the greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1328 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate water stress in the field significantly increased corn root length.

Treatment
Moderate water stresse0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
fielde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Moderate water stress in the field, however, significantly increased root length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1410 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–54 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water use efficiency of corn was positively correlated with root mass and length in the greenhouse.

Organ / stage
root mass and lengthe0
Outcome
Water use efficiencye0
Direction
positively correlatede0
Setting
greenhousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water use efficiency was positively correlated with root mass and length in the greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1412–1502 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water regime did not affect N influx of corn in either experiment.

Treatment
Water regimee0
Outcome
N influxe0
Direction
did not affecte0
Setting
either experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water regime did not affect N influx in either experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1504–1561 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–54 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that corn response to irrigation will be altered depending on root morphology.

Organ / stage
root morphologye0
Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
response to irrigatione0
Direction
alterede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn response to irrigation will be altered depending on root morphology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1589–1661 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–54 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend considering the root system when selecting N efficient and/or drought tolerant corn genotypes.

Outcome
root system should be considered when selecting for N efficient and/or drought tolerant corn genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the root system should be considered when selecting for N efficient and/or drought tolerant corn genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1693–1799 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

289 papers: 208 positive, 81 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 208 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

285 papers more in this group

See all 289 papers →

drought · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

385 papers: 77 positive, 308 negative or no effect

76 papers in the same direction as this paper · 306 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

381 papers more in this group

See all 385 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.