Paper · 1968 · Annals of Applied Biology

Changes in the microbial population of apple leaves associated with the inhibition of the perfect stage of Venturia inequalis after urea treatment

J. E. CROSSE; CONSTANCE M. E. GARRETT; R. T. BURCHILL

15
claims
33
verbatim quotes
33
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY Treatment of detached apple leaves in October with urea induced a rapid and prolonged increase in the microbial populations present in the leaves during the winter. These effects were accompanied by a major shift in the population balance from a predominantly Gram‐positive, chromogenic type of microflora to one dominated by Gram‐negative and non‐chromogenic organisms. Fluorescent pseudomonads became particularly numerous in the urea‐treated leaves and many were found to suppress the development in vitro of Venturia inaequalis. An organism forming yellow colonies, possessing exceptional activity against the scab fungus, which was also found in urea‐treated leaves, was shown to be a Gram‐negative, peritrichous bacterium. No antagonistic organisms were isolated from untreated control leaves, but many were found–usually chromogenic forms–which appeared to stimulate the scab fungus in vitro. Treatment with urea accelerated the decomposition of the leaves and suppressed the development of V. inaequalis in the portions of the laminae which remained structurally intact until the following spring. Many of the effects of urea were enhanced by the addition of glucose, streptomycin, or a suspension of a Pseudomonas sp. isolated from leaves during the winter. Streptomycin alone reduced the total numbers of microorganisms in the leaves but increased the proportion of Gram‐negative organisms: this was associated with diminished ascospore production in the spring. There was no direct evidence that the antagonistic flora stimulated by urea was responsible for the inhibition of V. inaequalis , and alternative explanations are suggested.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea treatment of apple leaves increased the microbial populations during winter.

Treatment
ureae0
Outcome
microbial populationse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of detached apple leaves in October with urea induced a rapid and prolonged increase in the microbial populations present in the leaves during the winter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–171 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea shifted the leaf population balance from Gram‐positive chromogenic microflora to Gram‐negative and non‐chromogenic organisms.

Outcome
population balancee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of detached apple leaves in October with urea induced a rapid and prolonged increase in the microbial populations present in the leaves during the winter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–171 · show in text ↑
e1

“These effects were accompanied by a major shift in the population balance from a predominantly Gram‐positive, chromogenic type of microflora to one dominated by Gram‐negative and non‐chromogenic organisms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 173–377 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluorescent pseudomonads became numerous in urea-treated leaves.

Treatment
ureae0
Outcome
Fluorescent pseudomonadse2
Direction
increaseinferrede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of detached apple leaves in October with urea induced a rapid and prolonged increase in the microbial populations present in the leaves during the winter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–171 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fluorescent pseudomonads became particularly numerous”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–432 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Many fluorescent pseudomonads suppressed the in vitro development of Venturia inaequalis.

Interactor
Venturia inaequalisVenturia inaequalise3pathogen
Second interactor
Fluorescent pseudomonadsPseudomonas fluorescens groupe2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
development in vitro of Venturia inaequalise3
Direction
suppresse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Venturia inaequalis
Venturia inaequalis · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of detached apple leaves in October with urea induced a rapid and prolonged increase in the microbial populations present in the leaves during the winter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–171 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fluorescent pseudomonads became particularly numerous”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–432 · show in text ↑
e3

“many were found to suppress the development in vitro of Venturia inaequalis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–539 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An organism forming yellow colonies had exceptional activity against the scab fungus.

Interactor
scab funguse4pathogen
Second interactor
An organism forming yellow coloniese5biocontrol_agent
Outcome
exceptional activity against the scab funguse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of detached apple leaves in October with urea induced a rapid and prolonged increase in the microbial populations present in the leaves during the winter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–171 · show in text ↑
e4

“possessing exceptional activity against the scab fungus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–633 · show in text ↑
e5

“An organism forming yellow colonies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–576 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The yellow-colony organism is a Gram‐negative, peritrichous bacterium.

Outcome
Gram‐negative, peritrichous bacteriume1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of detached apple leaves in October with urea induced a rapid and prolonged increase in the microbial populations present in the leaves during the winter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–171 · show in text ↑
e1

“Gram‐negative, peritrichous bacterium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–735 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No antagonistic organisms were isolated from untreated control leaves.

Outcome
antagonistic organismse5
Comparator
untreated control leavese5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of detached apple leaves in October with urea induced a rapid and prolonged increase in the microbial populations present in the leaves during the winter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–171 · show in text ↑
e5

“No antagonistic organisms were isolated from untreated control leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–806 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Many organisms from urea-treated leaves appeared to stimulate the scab fungus in vitro.

Interactor
scab funguse1pathogen
Outcome
stimulate the scab fungus in vitroe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of detached apple leaves in October with urea induced a rapid and prolonged increase in the microbial populations present in the leaves during the winter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–171 · show in text ↑
e1

“which appeared to stimulate the scab fungus in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–906 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea accelerated the decomposition of apple leaves.

Treatment
ureae6
Outcome
decomposition of the leavese6
Direction
acceleratede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of detached apple leaves in October with urea induced a rapid and prolonged increase in the microbial populations present in the leaves during the winter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–171 · show in text ↑
e6

“Treatment with urea accelerated the decomposition of the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–971 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea suppressed the development of V. inaequalis in leaf portions that stayed intact until spring.

Treatment
ureae0
Interactor
V. inaequalisVenturia inaequalise7pathogen
Outcome
development of V. inaequalise7
Direction
suppressede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Venturia inaequalis
Venturia inaequalis · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of detached apple leaves in October with urea induced a rapid and prolonged increase in the microbial populations present in the leaves during the winter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–171 · show in text ↑
e7

“suppressed the development of V. inaequalis in the portions of the laminae which remained structurally intact until the following spring”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glucose, streptomycin or a Pseudomonas suspension enhanced the effects of urea.

Treatment
addition of glucose, streptomycin, or a suspension of a Pseudomonas sp.e6
Outcome
effects of ureae6
Direction
enhancede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of detached apple leaves in October with urea induced a rapid and prolonged increase in the microbial populations present in the leaves during the winter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–171 · show in text ↑
e6

“Many of the effects of urea were enhanced by the addition of glucose, streptomycin, or a suspension of a Pseudomonas sp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1234 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Streptomycin alone reduced the total number of leaf microorganisms.

Treatment
Streptomycine1
Outcome
total numbers of microorganismse1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of detached apple leaves in October with urea induced a rapid and prolonged increase in the microbial populations present in the leaves during the winter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–171 · show in text ↑
e1

“Streptomycin alone reduced the total numbers of microorganisms in the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1351 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Streptomycin increased the proportion of Gram‐negative organisms.

Treatment
Streptomycine1
Outcome
proportion of Gram‐negative organismse2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of detached apple leaves in October with urea induced a rapid and prolonged increase in the microbial populations present in the leaves during the winter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–171 · show in text ↑
e1

“Streptomycin alone reduced the total numbers of microorganisms in the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1351 · show in text ↑
e2

“but increased the proportion of Gram‐negative organisms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1352–1407 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Streptomycin was associated with diminished ascospore production in spring.

Treatment
Streptomycine1
Outcome
ascospore productione3
Direction
diminishede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of detached apple leaves in October with urea induced a rapid and prolonged increase in the microbial populations present in the leaves during the winter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–171 · show in text ↑
e1

“Streptomycin alone reduced the total numbers of microorganisms in the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1351 · show in text ↑
e3

“this was associated with diminished ascospore production in the spring”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1409–1479 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

There was no direct evidence that the urea-stimulated antagonistic flora caused the inhibition of V. inaequalis.

Outcome
inhibition of V. inaequalise4
Qualifier
no direct evidencee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of detached apple leaves in October with urea induced a rapid and prolonged increase in the microbial populations present in the leaves during the winter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–171 · show in text ↑
e4

“There was no direct evidence that the antagonistic flora stimulated by urea was responsible for the inhibition of V. inaequalis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1481–1608 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · Venturia inaequalis · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.