Paper · 1994 · Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Growth of planted lodgepole pine and hybrid spruce following chemical and manual vegetation control on a frost-prone site

Phil LePage; K. Dave Coates

16
claims
34
verbatim quotes
11
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The 5-year height and diameter growth response of a frost-tolerant species, (lodgepole pine, Pinuscontorta var. latifolia Dougl. ex Loud.) and a frost-susceptible species (hybrid spruce, Piceaglauca (Moench) Voss × Piceasitchensis (Bong.) Carr.) to different vegetation-control site-preparation treatment and timing combinations was examined using a factorial experiment. The site chosen for the experiment is subject to frequent summer growing season frosts. The vegetation control treatments were: an untreated control, manual cutting, and glyphosate applied at the rates of 1.4 and 2.1 kg active ingredient (a.i.) per hectare. Each vegetation-control treatment was applied at four dates (timing) that covered the active growing season of the vegetation on the study area. Vegetation-control method had a major impact on the growth of the planted seedlings. The influence of timing of control treatments on growth was found to be minor. Fifth-year height and diameter in the manual cutting and control treatments were equally poor. Growth was significantly improved by both levels of chemical vegetation control and after 5 years, no differences were apparent between the two. Pine height and diameter and spruce diameter continually improved as the level of thimbleberry (Rubusparviflorus Nutt.) was reduced. Below 5% thimbleberry cover, this growth increased dramatically, suggesting a response threshold. As vegetation cover was lowered, however, spruce seedlings were damaged by frost, resulting in reduced total height. In this case, better height growth was associated with either very low or moderately high thimbleberry cover than with moderate to low levels.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vegetation control had a major impact on the growth of planted lodgepole pine seedlings.

Taxon
lodgepole pinePinus contortat0
Treatment
Vegetation-control methode1
Outcome
growth of the planted seedlingse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lodgepole pine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–32 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vegetation-control method had a major impact on the growth of the planted seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–858 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vegetation control had a major impact on the growth of planted hybrid spruce seedlings.

Taxon
hybrid sprucePiceat0
Treatment
Vegetation-control methode1
Outcome
growth of the planted seedlingse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea
Picea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)The original uploader was MPF at English Wikipedia . · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“hybrid spruce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–50 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vegetation-control method had a major impact on the growth of the planted seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–858 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The timing of control treatments had a minor influence on lodgepole pine growth.

Taxon
lodgepole pinePinus contortat0
Treatment
timing of control treatmentse2
Outcome
growthe2
Qualifier
minore2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lodgepole pine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–32 · show in text ↑
e2

“The influence of timing of control treatments on growth was found to be minor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–937 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The timing of control treatments had a minor influence on hybrid spruce growth.

Taxon
hybrid sprucePiceat0
Treatment
timing of control treatmentse2
Outcome
growthe2
Qualifier
minore2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea
Picea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)The original uploader was MPF at English Wikipedia . · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“hybrid spruce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–50 · show in text ↑
e2

“The influence of timing of control treatments on growth was found to be minor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–937 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fifth-year lodgepole pine height and diameter were equally poor in manual cutting and control treatments.

Taxon
lodgepole pinePinus contortat0
Treatment
manual cuttinge3
Outcome
height and diametere3
Direction
equally poore3
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lodgepole pine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–32 · show in text ↑
e3

“Fifth-year height and diameter in the manual cutting and control treatments were equally poor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1032 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fifth-year hybrid spruce height and diameter were equally poor in manual cutting and control treatments.

Taxon
hybrid sprucePiceat0
Treatment
manual cuttinge3
Outcome
height and diametere3
Direction
equally poore3
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea
Picea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)The original uploader was MPF at English Wikipedia . · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“hybrid spruce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–50 · show in text ↑
e3

“Fifth-year height and diameter in the manual cutting and control treatments were equally poor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1032 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical vegetation control significantly improved lodgepole pine growth at both levels.

Taxon
lodgepole pinePinus contortat0
Treatment
chemical vegetation controle4
Outcome
Growthe4
Direction
improvede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lodgepole pine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–32 · show in text ↑
e4

“Growth was significantly improved by both levels of chemical vegetation control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical vegetation control significantly improved hybrid spruce growth at both levels.

Taxon
hybrid sprucePiceat0
Treatment
chemical vegetation controle4
Outcome
Growthe4
Direction
improvede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea
Picea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)The original uploader was MPF at English Wikipedia . · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“hybrid spruce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–50 · show in text ↑
e4

“Growth was significantly improved by both levels of chemical vegetation control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1113 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 5 years, the two levels of chemical vegetation control gave no differences in lodgepole pine growth.

Taxon
lodgepole pinePinus contortat0
Treatment
chemical vegetation controle4
Outcome
differencese5
Qualifier
after 5 yearse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lodgepole pine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–32 · show in text ↑
e4

“Growth was significantly improved by both levels of chemical vegetation control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1113 · show in text ↑
e5

“after 5 years, no differences were apparent between the two”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1177 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 5 years, the two levels of chemical vegetation control gave no differences in hybrid spruce growth.

Taxon
hybrid sprucePiceat0
Treatment
chemical vegetation controle4
Outcome
differencese5
Qualifier
after 5 yearse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea
Picea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)The original uploader was MPF at English Wikipedia . · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“hybrid spruce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–50 · show in text ↑
e4

“Growth was significantly improved by both levels of chemical vegetation control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1113 · show in text ↑
e5

“after 5 years, no differences were apparent between the two”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1177 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lodgepole pine height and diameter improved as thimbleberry cover was reduced.

Taxon
lodgepole pinePinus contortat0
Treatment
level of thimbleberrye6
Interactor
thimbleberrye6weed
Outcome
height and diametere6
Direction
improvede6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lodgepole pine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–32 · show in text ↑
e6

“Pine height and diameter and spruce diameter continually improved as the level of thimbleberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1273 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrid spruce diameter improved as thimbleberry cover was reduced.

Taxon
hybrid sprucePiceat0
Treatment
level of thimbleberrye6
Interactor
thimbleberrye6weed
Outcome
spruce diametere6
Direction
improvede6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea
Picea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)The original uploader was MPF at English Wikipedia . · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“hybrid spruce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–50 · show in text ↑
e6

“Pine height and diameter and spruce diameter continually improved as the level of thimbleberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1273 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Below 5% thimbleberry cover, lodgepole pine growth increased dramatically, suggesting a response threshold.

Taxon
lodgepole pinePinus contortat0
Treatment
thimbleberry covere7
Outcome
this growthe7
Direction
increasede7
Value
Below 5%e7
Qualifier
suggesting a response thresholde7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lodgepole pine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–32 · show in text ↑
e7

“Below 5% thimbleberry cover, this growth increased dramatically, suggesting a response threshold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1408 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Below 5% thimbleberry cover, hybrid spruce growth increased dramatically, suggesting a response threshold.

Taxon
hybrid sprucePiceat0
Treatment
thimbleberry covere7
Outcome
this growthe7
Direction
increasede7
Value
Below 5%e7
Qualifier
suggesting a response thresholde7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea
Picea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)The original uploader was MPF at English Wikipedia . · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“hybrid spruce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–50 · show in text ↑
e7

“Below 5% thimbleberry cover, this growth increased dramatically, suggesting a response threshold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1408 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Frost damage to hybrid spruce seedlings reduced their total height as vegetation cover was lowered.

Taxon
hybrid sprucePiceat0
Treatment
froste1
Outcome
total heighte1
Direction
reducede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea
Picea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)The original uploader was MPF at English Wikipedia . · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“hybrid spruce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–50 · show in text ↑
e1

“As vegetation cover was lowered, however, spruce seedlings were damaged by frost, resulting in reduced total height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1525 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrid spruce height growth was better at very low or moderately high thimbleberry cover than at moderate to low levels.

Taxon
hybrid sprucePiceat0
Treatment
thimbleberry covere1
Outcome
height growthe1
Direction
bettere1
Qualifier
very low or moderately highe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea
Picea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)The original uploader was MPF at English Wikipedia . · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“hybrid spruce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–50 · show in text ↑
e1

“In this case, better height growth was associated with either very low or moderately high thimbleberry cover than with moderate to low levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1527–1668 · show in text ↑

pruning · growth · Pinus contorta (lodgepole pine)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.