Paper · 2011 · Ecological Entomology

Mycorrhiza modulates aboveground tri‐trophic interactions to the fitness benefit of its host plant

DANIELA HOFFMANN; HORST VIERHEILIG; STEFAN PENEDER; et al.

6
claims
15
verbatim quotes
32
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

1. Arbuscular mycorrhiza (AM), the association of AM fungi and plant roots, may alter morphological and physiological attributes of aboveground plant parts and thereby influence plant‐associated organisms such as herbivores and their natural enemies, predators and parasitoids. 2. The interactions between AM and the players of aboveground tri‐trophic systems have mainly been considered in isolation from each other. The effects of AM on aboveground herbivore–carnivore population dynamics and the consequences to plant fitness are unknown. 3. We explored AM‐induced compensatory mechanisms for AM‐promoted proliferation of the herbivorous spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch, on whole bean plants, Phaseolus vulgaris L. Vegetative and reproductive plant growth, AM fungal colonisation levels, and mite densities were assessed on spider mite‐infested plants colonised or not by the AM fungus Glomus mosseae Nicol. & Gerd, and harbouring the natural enemy of the spider mites, the predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis Anthias‐Henriot or not. 4. AM symbiosis modulated the aboveground tri‐trophic system to the fitness benefit of the plant. AM‐increased plant productivity outweighed the fitness decrease due to AM‐promoted herbivory: at similar vegetative growth, mycorrhizal plants produced more seeds than non‐mycorrhizal plants. 5. AM‐increased spider mite population levels were compensated for by enhanced population growth of the predators and increased plant tolerance to herbivory. 6. AM‐enhanced predator performance looped back to the AM fungus and stabilised its root colonisation levels, providing the first experimental evidence of a mutually beneficial interaction between AM and an aboveground third trophic level natural enemy.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal bean plants produced more seeds than non-mycorrhizal plants in the spider mite and predatory mite system.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise2
Treatment
AM fungus Glomus mosseaee3
Interactor
Glomus mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee3symbiont
Outcome
seedse1
Direction
moree1
Comparator
non‐mycorrhizal plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“at similar vegetative growth, mycorrhizal plants produced more seeds than non‐mycorrhizal plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1334 · show in text ↑
e2

“herbivorous spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch, on whole bean plants, Phaseolus vulgaris L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–722 · show in text ↑
e3

“colonised or not by the AM fungus Glomus mosseae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–909 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM increased plant productivity, outweighing the fitness decrease caused by AM-promoted herbivory.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise2
Treatment
AMe0
Outcome
plant productivitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AM‐increased plant productivity outweighed the fitness decrease due to AM‐promoted herbivory”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1236 · show in text ↑
e2

“herbivorous spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch, on whole bean plants, Phaseolus vulgaris L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–722 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM increased spider mite population levels on bean plants.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise2
Treatment
AMe4
Interactor
Tetranychus urticaeTetranychus urticaee2herbivore
Outcome
spider mite population levelse4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tetranychus urticae
Tetranychus urticae · InteractorGilles San Martin from Namur, Belgium · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“AM‐increased spider mite population levels were compensated for by enhanced population growth of the predators and increased plant tolerance to herbivory”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1339–1492 · show in text ↑
e2

“herbivorous spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch, on whole bean plants, Phaseolus vulgaris L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–722 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM-increased spider mite population levels were compensated by enhanced population growth of the predatory mites.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise2
Treatment
AMe4
Interactor
Phytoseiulus persimilisPhytoseiulus persimilise6biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
Tetranychus urticaeTetranychus urticaee2herbivore
Outcome
population growth of the predatorse4
Direction
enhancede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytoseiulus persimilis
Phytoseiulus persimilis · InteractorMick Talbot · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tetranychus urticae
Tetranychus urticae · Second interactorGilles San Martin from Namur, Belgium · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“AM‐increased spider mite population levels were compensated for by enhanced population growth of the predators and increased plant tolerance to herbivory”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1339–1492 · show in text ↑
e6

“the predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1021 · show in text ↑
e2

“herbivorous spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch, on whole bean plants, Phaseolus vulgaris L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–722 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM increased plant tolerance to spider mite herbivory on bean plants.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise2
Treatment
AMe4
Interactor
Tetranychus urticaeTetranychus urticaee2herbivore
Outcome
plant tolerance to herbivorye4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tetranychus urticae
Tetranychus urticae · InteractorGilles San Martin from Namur, Belgium · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“AM‐increased spider mite population levels were compensated for by enhanced population growth of the predators and increased plant tolerance to herbivory”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1339–1492 · show in text ↑
e2

“herbivorous spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch, on whole bean plants, Phaseolus vulgaris L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–722 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM-enhanced predator performance was associated with stabilised AM root colonisation levels.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise2
Interactor
AM funguse5symbiont
Second interactor
Phytoseiulus persimilisPhytoseiulus persimilise6biocontrol_agent
Outcome
root colonisation levelse5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytoseiulus persimilis
Phytoseiulus persimilis · Second interactorMick Talbot · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“AM‐enhanced predator performance looped back to the AM fungus and stabilised its root colonisation levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1497–1602 · show in text ↑
e6

“the predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1021 · show in text ↑
e2

“herbivorous spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch, on whole bean plants, Phaseolus vulgaris L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–722 · show in text ↑

Funneliformis mosseae · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

mycorrhiza · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 25 positive, 3 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

mycorrhiza · Tetranychus urticae · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.