Paper · 1985 · Journal of Environmental Quality

Nitrogen Fertilization and Ground Cover in a Hybrid Poplar Plantation: Effects on Nitrate Leaching

Richard A. Mc Laughlin; Phillip E. Pope; Edward A. Hansen

10
claims
36
verbatim quotes
31
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract A 3‐yr study in northern Wisconsin measured the effects of ground cover treatments and N fertilization on tree growth, NO 3 − ‐N leaching, and N mineralization in an irrigated hybrid poplar ( Populus deltoides Bartr. × P. trichocarpa Torr. and Gray, clone NC‐9922) plantation. Annually fertilized (112 kg N/ha per year) and unfertilized plots were either maintained weed‐free (bare soil), allowed to revegetate with native weeds, or seeded to birdsfoot trefoil ( Lotus corniculatus L.). Soil solution NO 3 − ‐N was monitored in samples from permanently installed cup lysimeters. During the first two growing seasons, fertilization in bare soil plots increased NO 3 − ‐N concentrations below the rooting zone to over 150 mg N/L. Tree growth response to fertilization in these plots occurred primarily in the third growing season, and NO 3 − ‐N concentrations were much lower in and below the rooting zone relative to previous years. Fertilization increased NO 3 − ‐N concentrations in the rooting zone during growing seasons two through four in trefoil plots and three and four in native weed plots. Nitrate‐N concentrations below the rooting zone in all trefoil and native weed plots averaged ≤ 11 mg/L until the end of the fourth growing season when it averaged 20 to 24 mg/L in fertilized plots. Fertilization significantly increased soil N mineralization in buried plastic bags only in plots with a ground cover and was 42 to 47% greater in these plots compared with fertilized bare soil plots. This study indicates that ground cover plays an important role in preventing leaching losses of fertilizer and native soil N in young biomass plantations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization in bare soil plots increased soil NO3-N concentrations below the rooting zone to over 150 mg N/L during the first two growing seasons.

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopuluse0
Treatment
Annually fertilized (112 kg N/ha per year)e4
Outcome
concentrations below the rooting zonee2
Direction
increasede1
Value
over 150 mg N/Le2
Qualifier
During the first two growing seasonse3
Comparator
unfertilized plotse5
Setting
northern Wisconsine6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in an irrigated hybrid poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–198 · show in text ↑
e1

“fertilization in bare soil plots increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–668 · show in text ↑
e2

“concentrations below the rooting zone to over 150 mg N/L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–735 · show in text ↑
e3

“During the first two growing seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–624 · show in text ↑
e4

“Annually fertilized (112 kg N/ha per year)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 286–328 · show in text ↑
e5

“and unfertilized plots were either maintained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–374 · show in text ↑
e6

“in northern Wisconsin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tree growth response to fertilization occurred primarily in the third growing season of the hybrid poplar plantation.

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopuluse0
Treatment
fertilizatione6
Outcome
Tree growth responsee6
Direction
increaseinferrede6
Qualifier
primarily in the third growing seasone6
Comparator
unfertilized plotse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in an irrigated hybrid poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–198 · show in text ↑
e6

“Tree growth response to fertilization in these plots occurred primarily in the third growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–836 · show in text ↑
e5

“and unfertilized plots were either maintained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–374 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the third growing season, NO3-N concentrations below and within the rooting zone of fertilized poplar plots were much lower than in previous years.

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopuluse0
Treatment
fertilizatione6
Outcome
concentrationse7
Direction
much lowere7
Comparator
previous yearse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in an irrigated hybrid poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–198 · show in text ↑
e6

“Tree growth response to fertilization in these plots occurred primarily in the third growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–836 · show in text ↑
e7

“concentrations were much lower in and below the rooting zone relative to previous years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–939 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization increased NO3-N concentrations in the rooting zone of trefoil plots during growing seasons two through four.

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopuluse0
Treatment
Fertilizatione6
Outcome
concentrations in the rooting zonee7
Direction
increasede6
Qualifier
during growing seasons two through foure7
Comparator
unfertilized plotse5
Setting
trefoil plotse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in an irrigated hybrid poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–198 · show in text ↑
e6

“Fertilization increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–964 · show in text ↑
e7

“concentrations in the rooting zone during growing seasons two through four in trefoil plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1066 · show in text ↑
e5

“and unfertilized plots were either maintained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–374 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization increased NO3-N concentrations in the rooting zone of native weed plots in growing seasons three and four.

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopuluse0
Treatment
Fertilizatione6
Outcome
concentrations in the rooting zonee7
Direction
increasede6
Qualifier
three and foure1
Comparator
unfertilized plotse5
Setting
native weed plotse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in an irrigated hybrid poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–198 · show in text ↑
e6

“Fertilization increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–964 · show in text ↑
e7

“concentrations in the rooting zone during growing seasons two through four in trefoil plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1066 · show in text ↑
e1

“three and four in native weed plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1106 · show in text ↑
e5

“and unfertilized plots were either maintained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–374 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In trefoil and native weed plots, NO3-N concentrations below the rooting zone averaged 11 mg/L or less until the end of the fourth growing season.

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopuluse0
Outcome
concentrations below the rooting zonee1
Value
≤ 11 mg/Le1
Qualifier
until the end of the fourth growing seasone1
Setting
trefoil and native weed plotse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in an irrigated hybrid poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–198 · show in text ↑
e1

“concentrations below the rooting zone in all trefoil and native weed plots averaged ≤ 11 mg/L until the end of the fourth growing season when it averaged 20 to 24 mg/L in fertilized plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1305 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In fertilized plots, NO3-N concentrations below the rooting zone averaged 20 to 24 mg/L at the end of the fourth growing season, higher than in unfertilized plots.

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopuluse0
Treatment
fertilizede1
Outcome
concentrations below the rooting zonee1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
20 to 24 mg/Le1
Comparator
unfertilized plotse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in an irrigated hybrid poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–198 · show in text ↑
e1

“concentrations below the rooting zone in all trefoil and native weed plots averaged ≤ 11 mg/L until the end of the fourth growing season when it averaged 20 to 24 mg/L in fertilized plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1305 · show in text ↑
e5

“and unfertilized plots were either maintained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–374 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization significantly increased soil N mineralization in buried bags only in plots with a ground cover.

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopuluse0
Treatment
Fertilizatione1
Outcome
soil N mineralizatione1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
only in plots with a ground covere1
Comparator
unfertilized plotse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in an irrigated hybrid poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–198 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fertilization significantly increased soil N mineralization in buried plastic bags only in plots with a ground cover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1423 · show in text ↑
e5

“and unfertilized plots were either maintained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–374 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil N mineralization in ground cover plots was 42 to 47% greater than in fertilized bare soil plots.

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopuluse0
Treatment
ground covere1
Outcome
soil N mineralizatione1
Direction
greatere2
Value
42 to 47%e2
Comparator
fertilized bare soil plotse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in an irrigated hybrid poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–198 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fertilization significantly increased soil N mineralization in buried plastic bags only in plots with a ground cover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1423 · show in text ↑
e2

“was 42 to 47% greater in these plots compared with fertilized bare soil plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1505 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ground cover plays an important role in preventing leaching losses of fertilizer and native soil N in young poplar plantations, compared with bare soil.

Taxon
hybrid poplarPopuluse0
Treatment
ground covere2
Outcome
preventing leaching losses of fertilizer and native soil Ne2
Direction
preventinge2
Comparator
bare soile1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in an irrigated hybrid poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–198 · show in text ↑
e2

“This study indicates that ground cover plays an important role in preventing leaching losses of fertilizer and native soil N in young biomass plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1507–1660 · show in text ↑
e1

“fertilization in bare soil plots increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–668 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Populus (poplar)Results differ

46 papers: 36 positive, 10 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Populus (poplar)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 19 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.