Paper · 2008 · Journal of Integrative Plant Biology

Gene Structure and Expression of the High‐affinity Nitrate Transport System in Rice Roots

Chao Cai; Jun‐Yi Wang; Yong‐Guan Zhu; et al.

11
claims
25
verbatim quotes
141
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Rice has a preference for uptake of ammonium over nitrate and can use ammonium-N efficiently. Consequently, transporters mediating ammonium uptake have been extensively studied, but nitrate transporters have been largely ignored. Recently, some reports have shown that rice also has high capacity to acquire nitrate from growth medium, so understanding the nitrate transport system in rice roots is very important for improving N use efficiency in rice. The present study identified four putative NRT2 and two putative NAR2 genes that encode components of the high-affinity nitrate transport system (HATS) in the rice (Oryza sativa L. subsp. japonica cv. Nipponbare) genome. OsNRT2.1 and OsNRT2.2 share an identical coding region sequence, and their deduced proteins are closely related to those from mono-cotyledonous plants. The two NAR2 proteins are closely related to those from mono-cotyledonous plants as well. However, OsNRT2.3 and OsNRT2.4 are more closely related to Arabidopsis NRT2 proteins. Relative quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction analysis showed that all of the six genes were rapidly upregulated and then downregulated in the roots of N-starved rice plants after they were re-supplied with 0.2 mM nitrate, but the response to nitrate differed among gene members. The results from phylogenetic tree, gene structure and expression analysis implied the divergent roles for the individual members of the rice NRT2 and NAR2 families. High-affinity nitrate influx rates associated with nitrate induction in rice roots were investigated and were found to be regulated by external pH. Compared with the nitrate influx rates at pH 6.5, alkaline pH (pH 8.0) inhibited nitrate influx, and acidic pH (pH 5.0) enhanced the nitrate influx in 1 h nitrate induced roots, but did not significantly affect that in 4 to 8 h nitrate induced roots.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four putative NRT2 and two putative NAR2 genes were identified.

Gene
NRT2e0
Outcome
four putative NRT2 and two putative NAR2 genese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“identified four putative NRT2 and two putative NAR2 genes that encode components of the high-affinity nitrate transport system (HATS) in the rice (Oryza sativa L. subsp. japonica cv. Nipponbare) genome”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–673 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OsNRT2.1 and OsNRT2.2 share an identical coding region.

Gene
OsNRT2.1 and OsNRT2.2e0
Outcome
identical coding region sequencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“OsNRT2.1 and OsNRT2.2 share an identical coding region sequence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–738 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–83 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OsNRT2.1 and OsNRT2.2 proteins are close to monocot proteins.

Gene
OsNRT2.1 and OsNRT2.2e1
Outcome
closely related to those from mono-cotyledonous plantse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“their deduced proteins are closely related to those from mono-cotyledonous plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–825 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“OsNRT2.1 and OsNRT2.2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–696 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAR2 proteins are closely related to monocot proteins.

Gene
NAR2e0
Outcome
closely related to those from mono-cotyledonous plantse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The two NAR2 proteins are closely related to those from mono-cotyledonous plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–907 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–83 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OsNRT2.3 and OsNRT2.4 are more closely related to Arabidopsis NRT2 proteins.

Gene
OsNRT2.3 and OsNRT2.4e0
Outcome
more closely related to Arabidopsis NRT2 proteinse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“OsNRT2.3 and OsNRT2.4 are more closely related to Arabidopsis NRT2 proteins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1001 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All six genes rose rapidly then declined after nitrate resupply.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
re-supplied with 0.2 mM nitratee0
Outcome
all of the six genese0
Direction
upregulated and then downregulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all of the six genes were rapidly upregulated and then downregulated in the roots of N-starved rice plants after they were re-supplied with 0.2 mM nitrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1248 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate response differed among gene members.

Outcome
response to nitratee0
Direction
differede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the response to nitrate differed among gene members”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1305 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–83 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The analyses implied divergent roles of rice NRT2 and NAR2 members.

Gene
NRT2 and NAR2e0
Outcome
divergent rolese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“implied the divergent roles for the individual members of the rice NRT2 and NAR2 families”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1471 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alkaline pH inhibited nitrate influx after one hour of induction.

Treatment
alkaline pH (pH 8.0)e0
Outcome
nitrate influxe0
Direction
inhibitede0
Qualifier
1 h nitrate induced rootse0
Comparator
pH 6.5e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“alkaline pH (pH 8.0) inhibited nitrate influx, and acidic pH (pH 5.0) enhanced the nitrate influx in 1 h nitrate induced roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1671–1797 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with the nitrate influx rates at pH 6.5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1621–1669 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acidic pH enhanced nitrate influx after one hour of induction.

Treatment
acidic pH (pH 5.0)e0
Outcome
nitrate influxe0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
1 h nitrate induced rootse0
Comparator
pH 6.5e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“acidic pH (pH 5.0) enhanced the nitrate influx in 1 h nitrate induced roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1722–1797 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with the nitrate influx rates at pH 6.5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1621–1669 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

pH did not significantly affect influx after four to eight hours of induction.

Treatment
alkaline pH (pH 8.0)e1
Outcome
nitrate influxe3
Direction
did not significantly affecte0
Qualifier
4 to 8 h nitrate induced rootse0
Comparator
pH 6.5e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“did not significantly affect that in 4 to 8 h nitrate induced roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1803–1870 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“alkaline pH (pH 8.0)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1671–1691 · show in text ↑
e2

“Compared with the nitrate influx rates at pH 6.5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1621–1669 · show in text ↑
e3

“High-affinity nitrate influx rates associated with nitrate induction in rice roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1473–1555 · show in text ↑

alkalinity · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 4 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

ph · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 6 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.