Paper · 2010 · Flavour and Fragrance Journal

Efficacy of plant essential oils on postharvest control of rot caused by fungi on four cultivars of apples in vivo

Jorge Giovanny Lopez‐Reyes; Davide Spadaro; Maria Lodovica Gullino; et al.

5
claims
6
verbatim quotes
121
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The efficacy of plant essential oils was evaluated on apples, cv. Golden Delicious, cv. Granny Smith, cv. Red Chief and cv. Royal Gala, at postharvest to control Botrytis cinerea and Penicillium expansum . The essential oils from basil ( Ocimum basilicum ), fennel ( Foeniculum sativum ), lavender ( Lavandula officinalis ), marjoram ( Origanum majorana ), oregano ( Origanum vulgare ), peppermint ( Mentha piperita ), rosemary ( Rosmarinus officinalis ), sage ( Salvia officinalis ), savory ( Satureja montana ), thyme ( Thymus vulgaris ) and wild mint ( Mentha arvensis ) were tested at different concentrations. All the essential oils were from mediterranean plants. The fruits were artificially wounded and inoculated with a suspension at 1 × 10 5 conidia/ml of each pathogen. After 12 h, emulsions at 1% and 10% of each essential oil were dropped into each inoculated wound. A tebuconazole chemical control and an inoculated control were also included. All the treated fruit were stored at 4 ± 1°C. After 15 and 30 days, the diameter of the rot around each wound was measured. The results revealed that the efficacies of the essential oils tested were cultivar‐ and storage time‐dependent. In any case, treatments with essential oils from oregano, savory and thyme showed significant efficacy in all apple cultivars tested. Treatments with essential oil emulsions at 10% were phytotoxic for all the apple cultivars evaluated. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Essential oil efficacy depended on apple cultivar and storage time.

Material
cultivare0
Outcome
efficacies of the essential oilse0
Setting
storage timee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“efficacies of the essential oils tested were cultivar‐ and storage time‐dependent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1202 · show in text ↑
t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Oregano essential oil significantly controlled rot in all tested apple cultivars.

Treatment
essential oils from oreganoe0
Outcome
efficacye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatments with essential oils from oregano, savory and thyme showed significant efficacy in all apple cultivars tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Savory essential oil significantly controlled rot in all tested apple cultivars.

Treatment
savorye0
Outcome
efficacye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatments with essential oils from oregano, savory and thyme showed significant efficacy in all apple cultivars tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Thyme essential oil significantly controlled rot in all tested apple cultivars.

Treatment
thymee0
Outcome
efficacye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatments with essential oils from oregano, savory and thyme showed significant efficacy in all apple cultivars tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten-percent essential oil emulsions were phytotoxic for all apple cultivars evaluated.

Treatment
essential oil emulsions at 10%e0
Outcome
phytotoxice0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments with essential oil emulsions at 10% were phytotoxic for all the apple cultivars evaluated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1438 · show in text ↑

Origanum vulgare · control · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

botanical · crop injury · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

botanical · control · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.