Paper · 1996 · Phytopathology

Effects of Peanut Stunt Virus,Meloidogyne incognita,and Drought on Growth and Persistence of White Clover

M. McLaughlin

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
9
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Productivity and persistence of white clover (Trifolium repens) in the southeastern United States are limited by a complex of pathogens and environmental stresses including peanut stunt virus (PSV), root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne incognita), and drought. Determining the separate and combined effects of these factors has been hampered by the rapid natural spread of PSV to noninoculated plants. Half-sib white clover plants with and without hypersensitive resistance to PSV were used to overcome this problem. Effects of PSV, M. incognita, and drought on clover growth and persistence in the field were measured using a factorial arrangement of treatments in a split-plot design in which half of the plots were irrigated to eliminate drought stress. Data were collected in 2 consecutive years on dry weight herbage yield, stolon density, leaf area, petiole length, seed production, nematode population density, rainfall, and soil moisture. Virus infection reduced cumulative herbage yield 14% in the first year and 24% in the second year. In the first year, irrigation increased cumulative herbage yield 5 and 13% in the presence and absence of M. incognita, respectively, compared with nonirrigated control plots without M. incognita. Cumulative herbage yield in drought-stressed plots was reduced 9% in the presence of M. incognita compared with nonirrigated control plots without M. incognita. In the second year, cumulative herbage yield in the absence of M. incognita was 54% higher in irrigated plots than in nonirrigated plots, while yield in nonirrigated plots was 17% lower in the presence of M. incognita. Clover persistence, as measured by stolon density, was reduced by PSV, M. incognita, and drought, but no interactions occurred. Reductions in persistence were most severe in M. incognita treatments, resulting in nearly complete loss of stands by the end of the second year. Virus infection reduced leaf area and petiole length in all treatments, but reductions were proportionately greater in irrigated plots. Nematode infestation generally reduced leaf area and petiole length, but the effect was less than that of PSV. Mean seed yields from 100 seed heads per plot were lower in nematode-infested plots, but slightly higher in nonirrigated plots and PSV-treated plots. Drought stress, M. incognita, and PSV acted independently in reducing forage productivity and persistence.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed public-domain. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Virus infection reduced first-year herbage yield 14%.

Taxon
white clover (Trifolium repens)Trifolium repenst0
Treatment
Virus infectione0
Outcome
cumulative herbage yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
14%e0
Qualifier
first yeare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Virus infection reduced cumulative herbage yield 14% in the first year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1013 · show in text ↑
t0

“white clover (Trifolium repens)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Virus infection reduced second-year herbage yield 24%.

Taxon
white clover (Trifolium repens)Trifolium repenst0
Treatment
Virus infectione0
Outcome
herbage yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
24%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Virus infection reduced cumulative herbage yield 14% in the first year and 24% in the second year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1040 · show in text ↑
t0

“white clover (Trifolium repens)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation increased first-year yield 5% with nematodes.

Taxon
white clover (Trifolium repens)Trifolium repenst0
Treatment
irrigatione0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
cumulative herbage yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
5e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation increased cumulative herbage yield 5 and 13% in the presence and absence of M. incognita, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1174 · show in text ↑
t0

“white clover (Trifolium repens)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation increased first-year yield 13% without nematodes.

Taxon
white clover (Trifolium repens)Trifolium repenst0
Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
cumulative herbage yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation increased cumulative herbage yield 5 and 13% in the presence and absence of M. incognita, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1174 · show in text ↑
t0

“white clover (Trifolium repens)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematodes reduced drought-stressed herbage yield 9%.

Taxon
white clover (Trifolium repens)Trifolium repenst0
Treatment
presence of M. incognitae0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
Cumulative herbage yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
9%e0
Comparator
nonirrigated control plots without M. incognitae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cumulative herbage yield in drought-stressed plots was reduced 9% in the presence of M. incognita compared with nonirrigated control plots without M. incognita.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1399 · show in text ↑
t0

“white clover (Trifolium repens)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Second-year irrigation increased herbage yield 54% without nematodes.

Taxon
white clover (Trifolium repens)Trifolium repenst0
Treatment
irrigated plotse0
Outcome
cumulative herbage yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
54%e0
Comparator
nonirrigated plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cumulative herbage yield in the absence of M. incognita was 54% higher in irrigated plots than in nonirrigated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1420–1536 · show in text ↑
t0

“white clover (Trifolium repens)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematodes lowered nonirrigated yield 17%.

Taxon
white clover (Trifolium repens)Trifolium repenst0
Treatment
presence of M. incognitae0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Value
17%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield in nonirrigated plots was 17% lower in the presence of M. incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1544–1617 · show in text ↑
t0

“white clover (Trifolium repens)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PSV reduced clover persistence.

Taxon
white clover (Trifolium repens)Trifolium repenst0
Treatment
PSVe0
Interactor
PSVPeanut stunt viruse0pathogen
Outcome
Clover persistencee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Clover persistence, as measured by stolon density, was reduced by PSV, M. incognita, and drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1619–1715 · show in text ↑
t0

“white clover (Trifolium repens)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematodes reduced clover persistence, nearly eliminating stands by year two.

Taxon
white clover (Trifolium repens)Trifolium repenst0
Treatment
M. incognita treatmentse0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
persistencee0
Direction
Reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reductions in persistence were most severe in M. incognita treatments, resulting in nearly complete loss of stands by the end of the second year.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1747–1892 · show in text ↑
t0

“white clover (Trifolium repens)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced clover persistence.

Taxon
white clover (Trifolium repens)Trifolium repenst0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
Clover persistencee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Clover persistence, as measured by stolon density, was reduced by PSV, M. incognita, and drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1619–1715 · show in text ↑
t0

“white clover (Trifolium repens)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Virus infection reduced leaf area and petiole length.

Taxon
white clover (Trifolium repens)Trifolium repenst0
Treatment
Virus infectione0
Outcome
leaf area and petiole lengthe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Virus infection reduced leaf area and petiole length in all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1893–1963 · show in text ↑
t0

“white clover (Trifolium repens)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematode infestation generally reduced leaf area and petiole length.

Taxon
white clover (Trifolium repens)Trifolium repenst0
Treatment
Nematode infestatione0
Outcome
leaf area and petiole lengthe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nematode infestation generally reduced leaf area and petiole length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2029–2096 · show in text ↑
t0

“white clover (Trifolium repens)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematode infestation lowered mean seed yields.

Taxon
white clover (Trifolium repens)Trifolium repenst0
Treatment
nematode-infested plotse0
Outcome
Mean seed yieldse0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mean seed yields from 100 seed heads per plot were lower in nematode-infested plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2140–2223 · show in text ↑
t0

“white clover (Trifolium repens)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nonirrigated plots had slightly higher seed yields.

Taxon
white clover (Trifolium repens)Trifolium repenst0
Treatment
nonirrigated plotse0
Outcome
seed yieldse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mean seed yields from 100 seed heads per plot were lower in nematode-infested plots, but slightly higher in nonirrigated plots and PSV-treated plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2140–2289 · show in text ↑
t0

“white clover (Trifolium repens)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PSV treated plots had slightly higher seed yields.

Taxon
white clover (Trifolium repens)Trifolium repenst0
Treatment
PSV-treated plotse0
Outcome
seed yieldse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mean seed yields from 100 seed heads per plot were lower in nematode-infested plots, but slightly higher in nonirrigated plots and PSV-treated plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2140–2289 · show in text ↑
t0

“white clover (Trifolium repens)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–63 · show in text ↑

Arachis hypogaea · Peanut stunt virus · Trifolium repens (white clover)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Meloidogyne incognita · yield · Trifolium repens (white clover)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

infection · yield · Trifolium repens (white clover)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

infection · growth · Trifolium repens (white clover)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 4 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

irrigation · yield · Trifolium repens (white clover)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.