Paper · 1988 · Crop Science

Compatibility of Metalaxyl with Rhizobium Meliloti on Alfalfa Seed to Control Pythium Damping Off

K. L. Edmisten; D. D. Wolf; E. L. Stromberg

2
claims
6
verbatim quotes
8
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Metalaxyl [ N ‐(2,6‐dimethylphenyi)‐ N ‐(methoxyacetyl)‐alanine methyl ester], an acylalanine fungicide, has been reported to be effective in controlling fungi in the order Peronosporales. Metalaxyl shows promise for control of Phytophthora root rot ( Phytophthora megasperma Drechs.) and damping‐off ( Pythium spp.) in seedling alfalfa ( Medicago satlva L.) if seed treatment does not interfere with the N 2 ‐fixing bacterium ( Rhizobium meliloti Dangeard). Spring nofill plantings often are made earlier where fall‐applied herbicide is used to suppress sod. Plantings made in cooler weather are more susceptible to seed‐ and soil‐borne diseases. Compatibility of this fungicide with R. meliloti when used as a seed treatment was determined using the most‐probable‐number technique, by measuring seedling growth, total seedling crude protein, and N 2 fixation as estimated by acetylene reduction. Metalaxyl had no detrimental effect on viability or N 2 ‐fixing capability of R. melilotl at recommended rates of application. Under growth chamber conditions, metalaxyl increased seedling survival by 45 to 60% over nontreated P. ultimum Trow infested controls.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metalaxyl at recommended rates had no detrimental effect on the viability or N2-fixing capability of Rhizobium meliloti.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae2
Treatment
Metalaxyle1
Interactor
R. melilotle4symbiont
Outcome
viabilitye1
Direction
no detrimental effecte1
Qualifier
at recommended rates of applicatione3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Metalaxyl had no detrimental effect on viability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–946 · show in text ↑
e2

“seedling alfalfa ( Medicago satlva L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–358 · show in text ↑
e3

“at recommended rates of application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1023 · show in text ↑
e4

“R. melilotl”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–987 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under growth chamber conditions, metalaxyl increased seedling survival by 45 to 60% over nontreated Pythium ultimum infested controls.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae2
Treatment
metalaxyle3
Interactor
P. ultimum TrowGlobisporangium ultimume3pathogen
Outcome
seedling survivale3
Direction
increasede3
Value
45 to 60%e3
Comparator
nontreated P. ultimum Trow infested controlse3
Setting
growth chamber conditionse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e2

“seedling alfalfa ( Medicago satlva L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–358 · show in text ↑
e3

“Under growth chamber conditions, metalaxyl increased seedling survival by 45 to 60% over nontreated P. ultimum Trow infested controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1158 · show in text ↑

metalaxyl · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.