Paper · 2006 · Food Additives & Contaminants

Impact of fungicides onAspergillus carbonariusgrowth and ochratoxin A production on synthetic grape-like medium and on grapes

N. Bellí; S. Marín; V. Sanchis; et al.

19
claims
35
verbatim quotes
59
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

A study was undertaken to evaluate the impact of the application of several fungicide treatments used in Spanish vines on Aspergillus carbonarius growth and ochratoxin A production. Three trials were designed in order: (1) to screen 26 fungicides at the doses recommended by manufacturers on grape-like synthetic medium at 20 and 30 degrees C; (2) to find out the minimum inhibitory concentration of each fungicide for A. carbonarius growth on synthetic medium; and (3) to investigate the effect of several fungicides on A. carbonarius-inoculated grapes. In synthetic medium nine fungicides significantly reduced A. carbonarius growth rate. Meanwhile, 13 fungicides completely inhibited its growth. In general, growth was faster at 30 degrees C than at 20 degrees C, contrary to ochratoxin A production. Fungicides that stopped fungal growth also inhibited ochratoxin A production, but not all the fungicides that reduced growth reduced the ochratoxin A synthesis. In general, fungicides that contained copper or strobilurins reduced both growth and ochratoxin A production, contrary to sulphur fungicides. At the optimum temperature for A. carbonarius growth of 30 degrees C, higher amounts of fungicide were needed to prevent fungal growth than at 20 degrees C. Among the fungicides that inhibited A. carbonarius growth on synthetic medium at the initial doses, cyprodinil seemed to be the active ingredient more effective at stopping fungal growth when testing reduced doses. The fungicide effect on grapes was similar to that on synthetic medium. Both infection and ochratoxin A production were reduced when using cyprodinil (37.5%) plus fludioxonil (25%) and azoxystrobin (25%). Penconazole (10%) also showed a clear reduction in ochratoxin A production at both temperatures, although infection was only reduced at 20 degrees C. Ochratoxin A reduction was strain and temperature-dependent. In general, fenhexamid (50%), mancozeb (80%) and copper hydroxide (80%) plus copper (50%) enhanced infection and ochratoxin A production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nine fungicides reduced fungal growth on synthetic medium.

Taxon
A. carbonariusAspergillus carbonariuse0
Treatment
nine fungicidese0
Outcome
A. carbonarius growth ratee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
ninee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In synthetic medium nine fungicides significantly reduced A. carbonarius growth rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–640 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thirteen fungicides completely inhibited fungal growth on synthetic medium.

Taxon
Aspergillus carbonariusAspergillus carbonariust0
Treatment
13 fungicidese0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
13e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Meanwhile, 13 fungicides completely inhibited its growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–698 · show in text ↑
t0

“Aspergillus carbonarius”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungal growth was generally faster at 30 than 20 degrees C.

Taxon
Aspergillus carbonariusAspergillus carbonariust0
Treatment
30 degrees Ce0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
fastere0
Comparator
20 degrees Ce0

Verbatim

e0

“In general, growth was faster at 30 degrees C than at 20 degrees C, contrary to ochratoxin A production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–803 · show in text ↑
t0

“Aspergillus carbonarius”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ochratoxin A production was lower at 30 than 20 degrees C.

Taxon
Aspergillus carbonariusAspergillus carbonariust0
Treatment
30 degrees Ce0
Outcome
ochratoxin A productione0
Comparator
20 degrees Ce0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“In general, growth was faster at 30 degrees C than at 20 degrees C, contrary to ochratoxin A production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–803 · show in text ↑
t0

“Aspergillus carbonarius”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicides stopping growth also inhibited ochratoxin production.

Taxon
Aspergillus carbonariusAspergillus carbonariust0
Treatment
Fungicides that stopped fungal growthe0
Outcome
ochratoxin A productione0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Fungicides that stopped fungal growth also inhibited ochratoxin A production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–880 · show in text ↑
t0

“Aspergillus carbonarius”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some fungicides reducing growth did not reduce toxin synthesis.

Taxon
Aspergillus carbonariusAspergillus carbonariust0
Outcome
ochratoxin A synthesise0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“not all the fungicides that reduced growth reduced the ochratoxin A synthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–963 · show in text ↑
t0

“Aspergillus carbonarius”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper or strobilurin fungicides reduced fungal growth.

Taxon
Aspergillus carbonariusAspergillus carbonariust0
Treatment
fungicides that contained copper or strobilurinse0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
sulphur fungicidese0

Verbatim

e0

“fungicides that contained copper or strobilurins reduced both growth and ochratoxin A production, contrary to sulphur fungicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1105 · show in text ↑
t0

“Aspergillus carbonarius”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper or strobilurin fungicides reduced ochratoxin A production.

Taxon
Aspergillus carbonariusAspergillus carbonariust0
Treatment
fungicides that contained copper or strobilurinse0
Outcome
ochratoxin A productione0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
sulphur fungicidese0

Verbatim

e0

“fungicides that contained copper or strobilurins reduced both growth and ochratoxin A production, contrary to sulphur fungicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1105 · show in text ↑
t0

“Aspergillus carbonarius”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More fungicide was needed to prevent growth at 30 than 20 degrees C.

Taxon
A. carbonariusAspergillus carbonariuse0
Outcome
amounts of fungicidee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
20 degrees Ce0

Verbatim

e0

“At the optimum temperature for A. carbonarius growth of 30 degrees C, higher amounts of fungicide were needed to prevent fungal growth than at 20 degrees C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1263 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At reduced doses cyprodinil appeared the most effective of initial growth inhibitors.

Taxon
Aspergillus carbonariusAspergillus carbonariust0
Treatment
cyprodinile0
Outcome
more effective at stopping fungal growthe0
Direction
more effectivee0

Verbatim

e0

“cyprodinil seemed to be the active ingredient more effective at stopping fungal growth when testing reduced doses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1364–1477 · show in text ↑
t0

“Aspergillus carbonarius”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide effects on grapes resembled effects on synthetic medium.

Taxon
grapese0
Outcome
fungicide effecte0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
synthetic mediume0

Verbatim

e0

“The fungicide effect on grapes was similar to that on synthetic medium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1479–1550 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cyprodinil plus fludioxonil reduced grape infection and ochratoxin production.

Taxon
grapest0
Treatment
cyprodinil (37.5%) plus fludioxonil (25%)e0
Interactor
Aspergillus carbonariusAspergillus carbonariust0pathogen
Outcome
infection and ochratoxin A productione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Both infection and ochratoxin A production were reduced when using cyprodinil (37.5%) plus fludioxonil (25%) and azoxystrobin (25%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1551–1683 · show in text ↑
t0

“Aspergillus carbonariusgrowth and ochratoxin A production on synthetic grape-like medium and on grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azoxystrobin reduced grape infection and ochratoxin production.

Taxon
grapest0
Treatment
azoxystrobin (25%)e0
Outcome
infection and ochratoxin A productione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Both infection and ochratoxin A production were reduced when using cyprodinil (37.5%) plus fludioxonil (25%) and azoxystrobin (25%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1551–1683 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penconazole reduced ochratoxin production at both temperatures.

Taxon
grapest0
Treatment
Penconazole (10%)e0
Outcome
ochratoxin A productione0
Direction
reductione0
Qualifier
both temperaturese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Penconazole (10%) also showed a clear reduction in ochratoxin A production at both temperatures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1684–1779 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penconazole reduced infection only at 20 degrees C.

Taxon
grapest0
Treatment
Penconazolee0
Outcome
infectione0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
20 degrees Ce0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Penconazole (10%) also showed a clear reduction in ochratoxin A production at both temperatures, although infection was only reduced at 20 degrees C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1684–1833 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–125 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ochratoxin reduction varied by strain and temperature.

Taxon
grapest0
Treatment
temperature-dependente0
Outcome
Ochratoxin A reductione0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Ochratoxin A reduction was strain and temperature-dependent.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1834–1894 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fenhexamid enhanced infection and ochratoxin production.

Taxon
grapest0
Treatment
fenhexamid (50%)e0
Outcome
infection and ochratoxin A productione0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“fenhexamid (50%), mancozeb (80%) and copper hydroxide (80%) plus copper (50%) enhanced infection and ochratoxin A production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1907–2031 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mancozeb enhanced infection and ochratoxin production.

Taxon
grapest0
Treatment
mancozeb (80%)e0
Outcome
infection and ochratoxin A productione0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“fenhexamid (50%), mancozeb (80%) and copper hydroxide (80%) plus copper (50%) enhanced infection and ochratoxin A production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1907–2031 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper hydroxide plus copper enhanced infection and ochratoxin production.

Taxon
grapest0
Treatment
copper hydroxide (80%) plus copper (50%)e0
Outcome
infection and ochratoxin A productione0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“fenhexamid (50%), mancozeb (80%) and copper hydroxide (80%) plus copper (50%) enhanced infection and ochratoxin A production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1907–2031 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–125 · show in text ↑

fenhexamid · disease · VitisPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Copper hydroxide · disease · VitisPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mancozeb · disease · VitisPositive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

copper atom · disease · VitisPositive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

azoxystrobin · disease · VitisPositive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.