Paper · 1995 · Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology

Induced systemic protection to powdery mildew in cucumber by phosphate and potassium fertilizers: effects of inoculum concentration and post-inoculation treatment

M. Reuveni; V. Agapov; R. Reuveni

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
41
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A single spray of 0.1 M solution of phosphate (K2HPO4, KH2PO4 (pH 4.5 or 9.3) NH4H2PO4), or potassium (KCl, KNO3, K2SO4) salts on the upper surface of the first true leaf of cucumber, before inoculation with Sphaerotheca fuliginea, induced up to 94% systemic protection to powdery mildew on leaves 2-5. Spraying of a 1:1 mixture of both phosphate and potassium fertilizer salts did not improve the protection as compared with that obtained by each of the salts alone. The protection on the upper leaves remained efficient up to 25 days after inoculation regardless of the high concentration of challenge inoculum of S. fuliginea. Postinoculum application of phosphate on the first leaf induced systemic protection against powdery mildew on upper leaves, even when sprayed 4 days after inoculation. The efficiency of induction of systemic protection and curative properties of phosphate and potassium fertilizers can be considered for disease control in the field.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A single spray of phosphate or potassium salts on the first true leaf of cucumber before inoculation with Sphaerotheca fuliginea induced up to 94% systemic protection to powdery mildew on leaves 2-5.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
A single spray of 0.1 M solution of phosphate (K2HPO4, KH2PO4 (pH 4.5 or 9.3) NH4H2PO4), or potassium (KCl, KNO3, K2SO4) saltse1
Interactor
Sphaerotheca fuligineaPodosphaera fuligineae1pathogen
Outcome
systemic protection to powdery mildewe1
Direction
inducede1
Value
94%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Podosphaera fuliginea
Podosphaera fuliginea · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAlexoutside · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A single spray of 0.1 M solution of phosphate (K2HPO4, KH2PO4 (pH 4.5 or 9.3) NH4H2PO4), or potassium (KCl, KNO3, K2SO4) salts on the upper surface of the first true leaf of cucumber, before inoculation with Sphaerotheca fuliginea, induced up to 94% systemic protection to powdery mildew on leaves 2-5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–301 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying a 1:1 mixture of phosphate and potassium salts did not improve protection compared with each salt alone.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
1:1 mixture of both phosphate and potassium fertilizer saltse1
Outcome
protectione1
Direction
did not improvee1
Comparator
each of the salts alonee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Spraying of a 1:1 mixture of both phosphate and potassium fertilizer salts did not improve the protection as compared with that obtained by each of the salts alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 303–466 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protection on the upper leaves of cucumber remained efficient up to 25 days after inoculation regardless of the high challenge inoculum concentration of S. fuliginea.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Interactor
S. fuligineaPodosphaera fuligineae1pathogen
Outcome
The protection on the upper leaves remained efficiente1
Qualifier
up to 25 days after inoculation regardless of the high concentration of challenge inoculume1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Podosphaera fuliginea
Podosphaera fuliginea · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAlexoutside · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The protection on the upper leaves remained efficient up to 25 days after inoculation regardless of the high concentration of challenge inoculum of S. fuliginea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–628 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphate applied to the first leaf after inoculation induced systemic protection against powdery mildew on upper leaves, even when sprayed 4 days after inoculation.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Postinoculum application of phosphate on the first leafe1
Outcome
systemic protection against powdery mildew on upper leavese1
Direction
inducede1
Qualifier
even when sprayed 4 days after inoculatione1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Postinoculum application of phosphate on the first leaf induced systemic protection against powdery mildew on upper leaves, even when sprayed 4 days after inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–796 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–57 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest that induced systemic protection and curative properties of phosphate and potassium fertilizers can be considered for disease control in the field.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Outcome
disease controle1
Setting
fielde1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The efficiency of induction of systemic protection and curative properties of phosphate and potassium fertilizers can be considered for disease control in the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–962 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–57 · show in text ↑

dipotassium hydrogen phosphate · Podosphaera fuliginea · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · control · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

phosphorus · disease · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

potassium · Podosphaera fuliginea · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · Podosphaera fuliginea · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.