Paper · 1992 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

Effect of restricted watering on sap flow and growth in corn (Zea mays L.)

J. E. Gavloski; C. R. Ellis; G. H. Whitfield

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
43
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The heat balance technique for measuring sap flow was used to determine how plant stress from watering various proportions of the root system in corn (Zea mays L.) affects sap flow and root and shoot growth. Sectional root-boxes were used to divide the root system into four equal compartments so that known proportions of the root system could be subjected to water stress. Results indicated that the root-box technique is useful in studying the effects of adverse growing conditions in corn. Treatments consisted of no watering and watering one, two, three, or four sections of the box. Sap flow was measured using gauges that worked on a heat balance principle, and aspects of root and shoot growth were also measured. Withholding water from two or more sections of the box for 26 d resulted in decreased sap flow and fresh and dry weight of stalks compared with plants where all four sections were watered (control). Plant height was lower in boxes where one or more sections were deprived of water compared with the control. Dry weight of roots was less when water was withheld from three or all sections of the roots, and fresh weight of roots was less when water was withheld from all four sections. Corn plants with even half the roots growing under stressed conditions resulted in decreased sap flow and shoot growth.Key words: Root-box, moisture stress

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The root-box technique was useful for studying adverse growing conditions in corn.

Outcome
root-box technique is usefule0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results indicated that the root-box technique is useful in studying the effects of adverse growing conditions in corn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–493 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Withholding water from at least two root-box sections for 26 days decreased sap flow and fresh and dry stalk weights relative to fully watered controls.

Treatment
Withholding water from two or more sections of the box for 26 de0
Outcome
sap flow and fresh and dry weight of stalkse0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
plants where all four sections were waterede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Withholding water from two or more sections of the box for 26 d resulted in decreased sap flow and fresh and dry weight of stalks compared with plants where all four sections were watered (control).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height was lower when at least one root-box section was deprived of water.

Treatment
one or more sections were deprived of watere0
Outcome
Plant heighte0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant height was lower in boxes where one or more sections were deprived of water compared with the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1029 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root dry weight was lower when water was withheld from three or all root sections.

Treatment
water was withheld from three or all sections of the rootse0
Outcome
Dry weight of rootse0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
plants where all four sections were waterede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry weight of roots was less when water was withheld from three or all sections of the roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1122 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–74 · show in text ↑
e1

“plants where all four sections were watered (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–919 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root fresh weight was lower when water was withheld from all four root sections.

Treatment
water was withheld from all four sectionse0
Outcome
fresh weight of rootse0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
plants where all four sections were waterede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fresh weight of roots was less when water was withheld from all four sections.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1206 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–74 · show in text ↑
e1

“plants where all four sections were watered (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–919 · show in text ↑

drought · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

385 papers: 77 positive, 308 negative or no effect

307 papers in the same direction as this paper · 77 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

381 papers more in this group

See all 385 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.