Paper · 1950 · Botanical Gazette

Influence of Growth "Hormones" on Boll Retention by Cotton Plants

Frank M. Eaton

9
claims
9
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

1. Under climatic conditions of the San Joaquin Valley of California dusting cotton plants during periods of active shedding with 100 p.p.m. of sodium 4-chlorophenoxyacetate and 1000 p.p.m. of naphthaleneacetic acid was without effect on boll retention in both 1947 and 1948. 2. Spraying plants weekly with a 20-p.p.m. solution of sodium 4-chlorophenoxyacetate, in an experiment where naphthaleneacetate and napthoxyacetate were without effect, significantly reduced the number of bolls per plant and the number of bolls per 100 gm. of stems and leaves and caused some increase in vegetative development. 3. The fruiting branches of the cotton plant are in some respects homologous to the inflorescences of other plants-that is, under certain conditions cotton can develop either vegetative or fruiting branches to the exclusion of the other type. Only the fruiting branches produce flowers. Various synthetic-hormone sprays used on various types of cotton and under various conditions did not materially alter the kind or proportions of branches developed. 4. The foregoing data provide little basis for believing that the late-season setting of cotton bolls can be increased by the use of the type of growth-regulating materials employed or for believing that these materials can alter materially the proportions of fruiting and vegetative branches. A florigen type of growth substance might, however, have marked effects. Also, the anti-auxin type of material remains to be studied.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dusting cotton with sodium 4-chlorophenoxyacetate did not affect boll retention in 1947 or 1948.

Treatment
100 p.p.m. of sodium 4-chlorophenoxyacetatee0
Outcome
boll retentione0
Direction
without effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dusting cotton plants during periods of active shedding with 100 p.p.m. of sodium 4-chlorophenoxyacetate and 1000 p.p.m. of naphthaleneacetic acid was without effect on boll retention in both 1947 and 1948”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 69–274 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dusting cotton with naphthaleneacetic acid did not affect boll retention in 1947 or 1948.

Treatment
1000 p.p.m. of naphthaleneacetic acide0
Outcome
boll retentione0
Direction
without effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dusting cotton plants during periods of active shedding with 100 p.p.m. of sodium 4-chlorophenoxyacetate and 1000 p.p.m. of naphthaleneacetic acid was without effect on boll retention in both 1947 and 1948”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 69–274 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weekly sodium 4-chlorophenoxyacetate sprays significantly reduced bolls per plant.

Treatment
20-p.p.m. solution of sodium 4-chlorophenoxyacetatee0
Outcome
number of bolls per plante0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Spraying plants weekly with a 20-p.p.m. solution of sodium 4-chlorophenoxyacetate, in an experiment where naphthaleneacetate and napthoxyacetate were without effect, significantly reduced the number of bolls per plant and the number of bolls per 100 gm. of stems and leaves and caused some increase in vegetative development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–604 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weekly sodium 4-chlorophenoxyacetate sprays significantly reduced bolls per stem and leaf mass.

Treatment
20-p.p.m. solution of sodium 4-chlorophenoxyacetatee0
Outcome
number of bolls per 100 gm. of stems and leavese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Spraying plants weekly with a 20-p.p.m. solution of sodium 4-chlorophenoxyacetate, in an experiment where naphthaleneacetate and napthoxyacetate were without effect, significantly reduced the number of bolls per plant and the number of bolls per 100 gm. of stems and leaves and caused some increase in vegetative development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–604 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weekly sodium 4-chlorophenoxyacetate sprays increased vegetative development somewhat.

Treatment
20-p.p.m. solution of sodium 4-chlorophenoxyacetatee0
Outcome
vegetative developmente0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Spraying plants weekly with a 20-p.p.m. solution of sodium 4-chlorophenoxyacetate, in an experiment where naphthaleneacetate and napthoxyacetate were without effect, significantly reduced the number of bolls per plant and the number of bolls per 100 gm. of stems and leaves and caused some increase in vegetative development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–604 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Naphthaleneacetate had no effect in the spray experiment.

Treatment
naphthaleneacetatee0
Outcome
effecte0
Direction
without effecte0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“naphthaleneacetate and napthoxyacetate were without effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–443 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Napthoxyacetate had no effect in the spray experiment.

Treatment
napthoxyacetatee0
Outcome
effecte0
Direction
without effecte0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“naphthaleneacetate and napthoxyacetate were without effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–443 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Synthetic hormone sprays did not materially alter cotton branch types or proportions.

Treatment
Various synthetic-hormone sprayse0
Outcome
kind or proportions of branches developede0
Direction
did not materially altere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Various synthetic-hormone sprays used on various types of cotton and under various conditions did not materially alter the kind or proportions of branches developed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1057 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors found little basis for using the tested growth regulators to increase late-season cotton boll set.

Outcome
late-season setting of cotton bollse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“provide little basis for believing that the late-season setting of cotton bolls can be increased by the use of the type of growth-regulating materials employed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1239 · show in text ↑

sodium atom · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

sodium atom · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

application · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

115 papers: 96 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 96 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

111 papers more in this group

See all 115 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.