Abstract
Between July and September 2003, severe foliar infection was observed on nursery-grown tea plants (Camellia sinensis) in five tea estates in the region of Dooars, North Bengal, India. Disease symptoms first appeared as greyish brown patches around tips and margins of young leaves. These lesions extend towards the midrib, resulting in leaf curl, death and defoliation. In severe infections, over 70% of the tea crop in affected nurseries was unusable. Older leaves appear to be less susceptible. The plants (T-17) in the nurseries where disease was found were growing under optimal conditions (i.e. not stressed) – temperature (28 ± 2°C), humidity (60–70%) – and were not affected by any other pathogens or physiological conditions. Similar symptoms have also been observed in field-grown plants. Field symptoms were observed 1 month following transfer of plants from the nursery. The disease was also noticed in the tea nursery the following year. A fungus was consistently isolated from the margins of these lesions onto potato dextrose agar amended with streptomycin sulphate. Cultures were maintained at 28 ± 2°C for 15 days. Microscopic examination revealed brown and septate hyphae and conidiophores (17–28 × 3–6 µm). Muriform conidia (23–34 × 7–10 µm) were usually solitary but occasionally in short chains. Based on the morphological characters, the fungus was identified as Alternaria alternata (W8053) and this identification was confirmed by the Global Plant Clinic, CABI Bioscience UK Centre. Pathogenicity tests were conducted on 23 tea varieties using unwounded, detached leaves, cut shoots and whole plants inoculated (5 × 105 spores mL−1 of the original A. alternata isolate) and tested in the laboratory, glasshouse and field, respectively (Chakraborty et al., 1995). Distilled water was used as controls. Among these 23 varieties, 12 were from the Tocklai Experimental Station, Jorhat, Assam (TV), eight from UPASI Tea Research Centre Valparai, Tamilnadu (UPASI), while three were from Darjeeling Tea Research Centre, Kurseong (T). Inoculated plants were covered with a polythene bag and incubated at 28 ± 2°C, under a 16 h photoperiod. Disease symptoms developed within 3 days on inoculated detached and attached leaves and shoots. Control plants remained unaffected. The pathogen was reisolated from lesions, thereby completing Koch's postulates. All varieties tested showed variable degrees of susceptibility to the pathogen, apart from TV-28, UPASI-2 and UPASI-8, which were resistant. Tea varieties T-17, T-78 and TV-22 were found to be highly susceptible. A polyclonal antibody has been raised against the isolate of A. alternata (W8053) and an immunodiagnostic kit has been developed for early detection of the pathogen from tea leaf tissues. This is the first report of a pathogenic A. alternata affecting tea in India. Authors are thankful to the Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, Government of India, for financial support and also grateful to Dr Robert Reeder, Global Plant Clinic, CABI Bioscience UK, for identification of the organism.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Severe foliar infection occurred in nursery tea plants in North Bengal.
- Taxon
- tea plants (Camellia sinensis)
Camellia sinensise0 - Outcome
- foliar infectione0
- Direction
- severee0
- Setting
- Dooars, North Bengal, Indiae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“severe foliar infection was observed on nursery-grown tea plants (Camellia sinensis) in five tea estates in the region of Dooars, North Bengal, India”
Claim · model-written summary
Severe infection left over 70% of tea crop in affected nurseries unusable.
Verbatim
e0“In severe infections, over 70% of the tea crop in affected nurseries was unusable”
Claim · model-written summary
Older tea leaves appeared less susceptible.
Verbatim
e0“Older leaves appear to be less susceptible”
t0“tea”
Claim · model-written summary
Tea disease symptoms were observed one month after nursery plants were transferred to the field.
Verbatim
e0“Field symptoms were observed 1 month following transfer of plants from the nursery”
t0“tea”
Claim · model-written summary
Alternaria alternata was identified from tea lesions.
- Taxon
- teat0
- Interactor
- Alternaria alternata
Alternaria alternatae0pathogen - Outcome
- identified as Alternaria alternatae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“the fungus was identified as Alternaria alternata (W8053)”
t0“tea”
Claim · model-written summary
Inoculated tea tissue developed disease symptoms within three days while controls remained unaffected.
Verbatim
e0“Disease symptoms developed within 3 days on inoculated detached and attached leaves and shoots. Control plants remained unaffected.”
t0“tea”
Claim · model-written summary
Tea varieties TV-28, UPASI-2 and UPASI-8 were resistant to the pathogen.
Verbatim
e0“TV-28, UPASI-2 and UPASI-8, which were resistant”
t0“tea”
Claim · model-written summary
Tea varieties T-17, T-78 and TV-22 were highly susceptible.
Verbatim
e0“Tea varieties T-17, T-78 and TV-22 were found to be highly susceptible”
Claim · model-written summary
An immunodiagnostic kit was developed for early detection of A. alternata in tea leaves.
Not reportedComparatorValue
Verbatim
e0“an immunodiagnostic kit has been developed for early detection of the pathogen from tea leaf tissues”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · disease · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.