Paper · 1979 · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture

The use of ethephon in advancing red colour in the apple cultivar Tydeman Early

KM Jones

19
claims
41
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A trial in the Huon Valley of southern Tasmania in 1976 showed that ethephon sprays applied seven days prior to harvest strongly advanced the red colouration of the apple cultivar Tydeman Early. Urea sprayed with the ethephon did not have a synergistic effect on apple colour as suggested for other types of fruit. In a second trial in 1977, sprays were applied two, one and zero weeks before the normal date of first picking, and the fruit harvested one week after spraying. At the first harvest the percentages of fruit in the economically important colour category (61-100% red) were 8.5, 39.9, 53.4 and 60.4 in the 0, 100, 200 and 300 ppm ethephon treatments, respectively. The 100 ppm spray was better than the control (P < 0.001), and 200 ppm was better than 100 ppm, (P < 0.05) ;the 300 ppm spray was not significantly better than 200 ppm. The 200 ppm treatment achieved the over 50% target in the high colour category at the first harvest. Even at the third harvest, fruit on unsprayed trees was not red enough for a one-pick harvest. Treatments reduced yield through an increase in windfalls from 12 to 22% as the ethephon concentration increased from 0 to 300 ppm. No effect on mean fruit size was detected. No commercially important quality problems arose during storage although there was a small overall incidence of slight core rots. This work leads to a recommendation that in Tasmania 200 ppm ethephon should be sprayed two weeks prior to the normal first pick, allowing the complete harvest of marketable fruit one week prior to normal first pick. A stop-drop spray such as NAA or 245TP should be sprayed with the ethephon to reduce abscission losses. Storage is recommended as a method of bridging the supply gap between Tydeman Early and mid-season cultivars.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon sprays applied seven days before harvest strongly advanced red colouration of Tydeman Early apples.

Material
Tydeman Earlyt0
Treatment
ethephon sprays applied seven days prior to harveste1
Outcome
red colouratione1
Direction
strongly advancede1
Setting
Huon Valley of southern Tasmaniae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple cultivar Tydeman Early”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–79 · show in text ↑
e1

“A trial in the Huon Valley of southern Tasmania in 1976 showed that ethephon sprays applied seven days prior to harvest strongly advanced the red colouration of the apple cultivar Tydeman Early”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–193 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea sprayed with ethephon had no synergistic effect on apple colour.

Treatment
Urea sprayed with the ethephone2
Outcome
synergistic effect on apple coloure2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple cultivar Tydeman Early”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–79 · show in text ↑
e2

“Urea sprayed with the ethephon did not have a synergistic effect on apple colour as suggested for other types of fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–313 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100 ppm ethephon spray gave a better percentage of fruit in the top colour category than the control (P < 0.001).

Treatment
100 ppm spraye3
Outcome
percentages of fruit in the economically important colour category (61-100% red)e6
Direction
bettere3
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple cultivar Tydeman Early”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–79 · show in text ↑
e3

“The 100 ppm spray was better than the control (P < 0.001), and 200 ppm was better than 100 ppm, (P < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–784 · show in text ↑
e6

“At the first harvest the percentages of fruit in the economically important colour category (61-100% red) were 8.5, 39.9, 53.4 and 60.4 in the 0, 100, 200 and 300 ppm ethephon treatments, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–676 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

200 ppm ethephon gave a better percentage of fruit in the top colour category than 100 ppm (P < 0.05).

Treatment
200 ppme3
Outcome
percentages of fruit in the economically important colour category (61-100% red)e6
Direction
bettere3
Comparator
100 ppme3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple cultivar Tydeman Early”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–79 · show in text ↑
e3

“The 100 ppm spray was better than the control (P < 0.001), and 200 ppm was better than 100 ppm, (P < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–784 · show in text ↑
e6

“At the first harvest the percentages of fruit in the economically important colour category (61-100% red) were 8.5, 39.9, 53.4 and 60.4 in the 0, 100, 200 and 300 ppm ethephon treatments, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–676 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 300 ppm ethephon spray was not significantly better than 200 ppm.

Treatment
the 300 ppm spraye4
Outcome
percentages of fruit in the economically important colour category (61-100% red)e6
Direction
not significantly bettere4
Comparator
200 ppme4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple cultivar Tydeman Early”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–79 · show in text ↑
e4

“the 300 ppm spray was not significantly better than 200 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–845 · show in text ↑
e6

“At the first harvest the percentages of fruit in the economically important colour category (61-100% red) were 8.5, 39.9, 53.4 and 60.4 in the 0, 100, 200 and 300 ppm ethephon treatments, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–676 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

200 ppm ethephon achieved the over 50% target in the high colour category at the first harvest.

Treatment
The 200 ppm treatmente5
Outcome
over 50% target in the high colour categorye5
Direction
achievede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple cultivar Tydeman Early”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–79 · show in text ↑
e5

“The 200 ppm treatment achieved the over 50% target in the high colour category at the first harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–946 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the first harvest, 8.5% of fruit from the 0 ppm ethephon treatment was in the top colour category.

Treatment
ethephone6
Outcome
percentages of fruit in the economically important colour category (61-100% red)e6
Value
8.5e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple cultivar Tydeman Early”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–79 · show in text ↑
e6

“At the first harvest the percentages of fruit in the economically important colour category (61-100% red) were 8.5, 39.9, 53.4 and 60.4 in the 0, 100, 200 and 300 ppm ethephon treatments, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–676 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the first harvest, 39.9% of fruit from the 100 ppm ethephon treatment was in the top colour category.

Treatment
ethephone6
Outcome
percentages of fruit in the economically important colour category (61-100% red)e6
Value
39.9e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple cultivar Tydeman Early”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–79 · show in text ↑
e6

“At the first harvest the percentages of fruit in the economically important colour category (61-100% red) were 8.5, 39.9, 53.4 and 60.4 in the 0, 100, 200 and 300 ppm ethephon treatments, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–676 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the first harvest, 53.4% of fruit from the 200 ppm ethephon treatment was in the top colour category.

Treatment
ethephone6
Outcome
percentages of fruit in the economically important colour category (61-100% red)e6
Value
53.4e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple cultivar Tydeman Early”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–79 · show in text ↑
e6

“At the first harvest the percentages of fruit in the economically important colour category (61-100% red) were 8.5, 39.9, 53.4 and 60.4 in the 0, 100, 200 and 300 ppm ethephon treatments, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–676 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the first harvest, 60.4% of fruit from the 300 ppm ethephon treatment was in the top colour category.

Treatment
ethephone6
Outcome
percentages of fruit in the economically important colour category (61-100% red)e6
Value
60.4e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple cultivar Tydeman Early”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–79 · show in text ↑
e6

“At the first harvest the percentages of fruit in the economically important colour category (61-100% red) were 8.5, 39.9, 53.4 and 60.4 in the 0, 100, 200 and 300 ppm ethephon treatments, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–676 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Even at the third harvest, fruit on unsprayed trees was not red enough for a one-pick harvest.

Outcome
red enough for a one-pick harveste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple cultivar Tydeman Early”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–79 · show in text ↑
e1

“Even at the third harvest, fruit on unsprayed trees was not red enough for a one-pick harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1041 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon concentration from 0 to 300 ppm reduced yield.

Treatment
ethephon concentration increased from 0 to 300 ppme7
Outcome
yielde7
Direction
reducede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple cultivar Tydeman Early”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–79 · show in text ↑
e7

“Treatments reduced yield through an increase in windfalls from 12 to 22% as the ethephon concentration increased from 0 to 300 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1173 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon concentration increased windfalls from 12 to 22%.

Treatment
ethephon concentratione7
Outcome
windfallse7
Direction
increasee7
Value
from 12 to 22%e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple cultivar Tydeman Early”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–79 · show in text ↑
e7

“Treatments reduced yield through an increase in windfalls from 12 to 22% as the ethephon concentration increased from 0 to 300 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1173 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon had no effect on mean fruit size.

Outcome
mean fruit sizee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple cultivar Tydeman Early”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–79 · show in text ↑
e1

“No effect on mean fruit size was detected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1216 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No commercially important quality problems arose in storage.

Outcome
commercially important quality problemse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple cultivar Tydeman Early”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–79 · show in text ↑
e1

“No commercially important quality problems arose during storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1281 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A small overall incidence of slight core rots occurred in storage.

Outcome
incidence of slight core rotse1
Qualifier
small overalle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple cultivar Tydeman Early”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–79 · show in text ↑
e1

“there was a small overall incidence of slight core rots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1346 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

In Tasmania, 200 ppm ethephon should be sprayed two weeks before the normal first pick.

Outcome
200 ppm ethephon should be sprayed two weeks prior to the normal first picke1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple cultivar Tydeman Early”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–79 · show in text ↑
e1

“This work leads to a recommendation that in Tasmania 200 ppm ethephon should be sprayed two weeks prior to the normal first pick”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1348–1476 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A stop-drop spray such as NAA or 245TP should be applied with ethephon to reduce abscission losses.

Treatment
A stop-drop spray such as NAA or 245TPe1
Outcome
reduce abscission lossese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple cultivar Tydeman Early”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–79 · show in text ↑
e1

“A stop-drop spray such as NAA or 245TP should be sprayed with the ethephon to reduce abscission losses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1565–1667 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Storage is recommended to bridge the supply gap between Tydeman Early and mid-season cultivars.

Outcome
bridging the supply gap between Tydeman Early and mid-season cultivarse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple cultivar Tydeman Early”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–79 · show in text ↑
e1

“Storage is recommended as a method of bridging the supply gap between Tydeman Early and mid-season cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1669–1777 · show in text ↑

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

32 papers: 26 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

73 papers: 44 positive, 29 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

nitrogen · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 5 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

application · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

74 papers: 58 positive, 16 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

70 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.