Paper · 2012 · Journal of Dairy Science

The effects of hybrid, maturity, and length of storage on the composition and nutritive value of corn silage

M.C. Der Bedrosian; K.E. Nestor; L. Kung

20
claims
39
verbatim quotes
164
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of hybrid, maturity at harvest [dry matter (DM) content], and length of storage on the composition and nutritive value of corn silage. The plants used in this study included a normal (NORM) and a brown midrib (BMR) hybrid, harvested at 32 or 41% DM and ensiled for various lengths of time (0 to 360 d) without inoculation. Measurements included nutrient analysis, fermentation end products, in vitro digestion of NDF (NDF-D, 30 h), and in vitro digestion of starch (7h). The concentration of acetic acid increased with length of storage for all treatments, specifically increasing as much as 140% between d 45 to 360 for 32% DM BMR silage. Small changes in lactic acid and ethanol were noted but varied by DM and hybrid. When averaged across maturities and length of storage, compared with NORM, BMR silage was lower in concentrations of lignin, crude protein, neutral detergent fiber, and acid detergent fiber, but higher in starch. On average, NDF-D of both hybrids was not affected by length of storage between 45 and 270 d. The NDF-D was markedly greater for BMR than NORM after all times of storage. Increasing maturity at harvest generally did not affect the NDF-D of NORM, with the exception that it was slightly lower for the more mature plants at 270 and 360 d. In contrast, the NDF-D of BMR was lower in more mature silage by approximately 5 percentage units from 45 to 360 d. The concentration of starch for 32% DM NORM was lower (21%) than other treatments (31±3%; mean±SD) at harvest. This finding was probably the cause for starch digestibility to be highest in 32% DM NORM samples atd 0 (about 80%) and lower (65 to 68%) for other treatments. Concentrations of soluble N and ammonia-N increased with length of storage, indicating that proteolytic mechanisms were active beyond 2 to 3 mo of storage. The in vitro digestion of starch generally increased with length of storage, probably as a result of proteolysis. Although active fermentation occurs for only a relatively short time in the silo, many metabolic processes remain active during long-term storage. Changes in the nutritive value of corn silage during storage should be accounted for during ration formulations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetic acid concentration increased with storage for all corn silage treatments, by as much as 140% between days 45 and 360 in 32% DM BMR silage.

Material
BMRe0
Treatment
length of storagee0
Outcome
concentration of acetic acide0
Direction
increasede0
Value
140%e0
Qualifier
between d 45 to 360 for 32% DM BMR silagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The concentration of acetic acid increased with length of storage for all treatments, specifically increasing as much as 140% between d 45 to 360 for 32% DM BMR silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–693 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Small changes in lactic acid and ethanol varied by dry matter and hybrid in corn silage.

Outcome
lactic acid and ethanole0
Qualifier
varied by DM and hybride0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Small changes in lactic acid and ethanol were noted but varied by DM and hybrid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–774 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Averaged over maturity and storage, BMR corn silage had lower lignin, crude protein and neutral detergent fiber than NORM.

Material
BMRe0
Outcome
lignin, crude protein, neutral detergent fibere0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
averaged across maturities and length of storagee0
Comparator
NORMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When averaged across maturities and length of storage, compared with NORM, BMR silage was lower in concentrations of lignin, crude protein, neutral detergent fiber, and acid detergent fiber, but higher in starch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–987 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BMR corn silage had lower acid detergent fiber than NORM averaged across maturity and storage.

Material
BMRe0
Outcome
acid detergent fibere0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
averaged across maturities and length of storagee0
Comparator
NORMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When averaged across maturities and length of storage, compared with NORM, BMR silage was lower in concentrations of lignin, crude protein, neutral detergent fiber, and acid detergent fiber, but higher in starch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–987 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BMR corn silage had higher starch than NORM averaged across maturity and storage.

Material
BMRe0
Outcome
starche0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
NORMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When averaged across maturities and length of storage, compared with NORM, BMR silage was lower in concentrations of lignin, crude protein, neutral detergent fiber, and acid detergent fiber, but higher in starch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–987 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On average, storage between days 45 and 270 did not affect NDF digestion of either corn hybrid.

Treatment
length of storagee0
Outcome
NDF-De0
Direction
not affectede0
Qualifier
between 45 and 270 de0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On average, NDF-D of both hybrids was not affected by length of storage between 45 and 270 d”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1081 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NDF digestion was markedly greater for BMR than NORM corn after every storage duration.

Material
BMRe0
Outcome
NDF-De0
Direction
markedly greatere0
Qualifier
after all times of storagee0
Comparator
NORMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The NDF-D was markedly greater for BMR than NORM after all times of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1158 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing harvest maturity generally did not affect NDF digestion of NORM corn.

Material
NORMe0
Treatment
Increasing maturity at harveste0
Outcome
NDF-De0
Direction
did not affecte0
Qualifier
generallye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing maturity at harvest generally did not affect the NDF-D of NORM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1233 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NDF digestion of NORM corn was slightly lower in more mature plants at days 270 and 360.

Material
NORMe0
Treatment
Increasing maturity at harveste0
Outcome
NDF-De0
Direction
slightly lowere0
Qualifier
at 270 and 360 de0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing maturity at harvest generally did not affect the NDF-D of NORM, with the exception that it was slightly lower for the more mature plants at 270 and 360 d”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1324 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More mature BMR corn silage had approximately five percentage units lower NDF digestion from days 45 to 360.

Material
BMRe0
Treatment
more mature silagee0
Outcome
NDF-De0
Direction
lowere0
Value
approximately 5 percentage unitse0
Qualifier
from 45 to 360 de0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the NDF-D of BMR was lower in more mature silage by approximately 5 percentage units from 45 to 360 d”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1339–1440 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At harvest, starch concentration of 32% DM NORM corn was 21%, lower than other treatments at 31±3%.

Material
NORMe0
Organ / stage
at harveste0
Outcome
concentration of starche0
Direction
lowere0
Value
21%e0
Qualifier
31±3%; mean±SDe0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The concentration of starch for 32% DM NORM was lower (21%) than other treatments (31±3%; mean±SD) at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1442–1551 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Starch digestibility was highest, about 80%, in 32% DM NORM corn samples at day zero.

Material
NORMe0
Outcome
starch digestibilitye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
about 80%e0
Qualifier
32% DM NORM samples atd 0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This finding was probably the cause for starch digestibility to be highest in 32% DM NORM samples atd 0 (about 80%) and lower (65 to 68%) for other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1553–1711 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other corn treatments had lower day-zero starch digestibility, 65 to 68%.

Outcome
starch digestibilitye0
Direction
lowere0
Value
65 to 68%e0
Qualifier
other treatmentse0
Comparator
NORMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This finding was probably the cause for starch digestibility to be highest in 32% DM NORM samples atd 0 (about 80%) and lower (65 to 68%) for other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1553–1711 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The low starch concentration was interpreted as the probable reason for highest day-zero starch digestibility in 32% DM NORM corn.

Material
NORMe0
Compound
starche0
Outcome
starch digestibilitye0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
probably the causee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The concentration of starch for 32% DM NORM was lower (21%) than other treatments (31±3%; mean±SD) at harvest. This finding was probably the cause for starch digestibility to be highest in 32% DM NORM samples atd 0 (about 80%) and lower (65 to 68%) for other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1442–1711 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soluble nitrogen and ammonia-nitrogen concentrations increased with corn silage storage duration.

Treatment
length of storagee0
Outcome
Concentrations of soluble N and ammonia-Ne0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Concentrations of soluble N and ammonia-N increased with length of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1713–1787 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing soluble and ammonia nitrogen indicated that proteolytic mechanisms remained active beyond two to three months of corn silage storage.

Outcome
Concentrations of soluble N and ammonia-Ne0
Qualifier
proteolytic mechanisms were active beyond 2 to 3 mo of storagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Concentrations of soluble N and ammonia-N increased with length of storage, indicating that proteolytic mechanisms were active beyond 2 to 3 mo of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1713–1867 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In vitro starch digestion generally increased with corn silage storage duration.

Treatment
length of storagee0
Outcome
in vitro digestion of starche0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
generallye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The in vitro digestion of starch generally increased with length of storage, probably as a result of proteolysis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1869–1981 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The storage-related increase in starch digestion was interpreted as probably resulting from proteolysis.

Outcome
in vitro digestion of starche0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
probably as a result of proteolysise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The in vitro digestion of starch generally increased with length of storage, probably as a result of proteolysis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1869–1981 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Many metabolic processes remain active during long-term corn silage storage despite relatively brief active fermentation.

Outcome
many metabolic processes remain activee0
Qualifier
during long-term storagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Although active fermentation occurs for only a relatively short time in the silo, many metabolic processes remain active during long-term storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1983–2128 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend accounting for storage-related corn silage nutritive-value changes in ration formulations.

Outcome
accounted for during ration formulationse0
Qualifier
Changes in the nutritive value of corn silage during storagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Changes in the nutritive value of corn silage during storage should be accounted for during ration formulations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2130–2241 · show in text ↑

stage · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

storage · quality: sugar starch · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

storage · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 5 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

processing · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 14 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.