Paper · 1981 · Physiologia Plantarum

Differences in salt tolerance of three sugar beet genotypes

H. Marschner; A. Kylin; P. J. C. Kuiper

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
68
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of increasing NaCl concentrations (up to 150 m M ) on growth and mineral composition of three genotypes of sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris L., MONOHILL, ADA and FIA) has been studied. Growth was stimulated or little affected in water culture by 50 m M NaCl in all 3 genotypes. Further increase in NaCl concentration depressed growth in ADA more than in MONOHILL, whereas in FIA growth did not significantly differ from the untreated control. In all 3 genotypes, particularly in FIA, increasing NaCl concentrations decreased potassium content in the shoots more than in the fibrous and storage roots. Simultaneously, the accumulation of sodium and chloride in the shoots was considerably higher in FIA than in ADA, where in contrast larger proportions of these ions were retained in the roots. The results demonstrate considerable genotypic differences in salt tolerance of sugar beet and indicate a positive correlation between salt tolerance and accumulation of sodium and chloride in the shoots. FIA but not ADA may be suited for a breeding programme of sugar beet for improved salt tolerance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 50 m M NaCl, growth was stimulated or little affected in all three sugar beet genotypes.

Treatment
50 m M NaCle0
Outcome
Growthe0
Direction
stimulated or little affectede0
Setting
water culturee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth was stimulated or little affected in water culture by 50 m M NaCl in all 3 genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 190–282 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris L., MONOHILL, ADA and FIA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–171 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Further NaCl increase depressed ADA growth more than MONOHILL growth.

Material
ADAe0
Treatment
Further increase in NaCl concentratione0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
depressede0
Comparator
MONOHILLe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Further increase in NaCl concentration depressed growth in ADA more than in MONOHILL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–367 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris L., MONOHILL, ADA and FIA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–171 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FIA growth under further NaCl increase did not significantly differ from untreated control.

Material
FIAe0
Treatment
Further increase in NaCl concentratione1
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
did not significantly differe0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in FIA growth did not significantly differ from the untreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–447 · show in text ↑
e1

“Further increase in NaCl concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–321 · show in text ↑
e2

“sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris L., MONOHILL, ADA and FIA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–171 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing NaCl decreased shoot potassium more than root potassium in all three genotypes, particularly FIA.

Treatment
increasing NaCl concentrationse0
Outcome
potassium content in the shootse0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
particularly in FIAe0
Comparator
fibrous and storage rootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In all 3 genotypes, particularly in FIA, increasing NaCl concentrations decreased potassium content in the shoots more than in the fibrous and storage roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–605 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris L., MONOHILL, ADA and FIA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–171 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FIA accumulated more sodium in shoots than ADA, which retained more in roots.

Material
FIAe0
Outcome
sodiume0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
ADAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the accumulation of sodium and chloride in the shoots was considerably higher in FIA than in ADA, where in contrast larger proportions of these ions were retained in the roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–798 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris L., MONOHILL, ADA and FIA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–171 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FIA accumulated more chloride in shoots than ADA, which retained more in roots.

Material
FIAe0
Outcome
accumulation of sodium and chloride in the shootse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
ADAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the accumulation of sodium and chloride in the shoots was considerably higher in FIA than in ADA, where in contrast larger proportions of these ions were retained in the roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–798 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris L., MONOHILL, ADA and FIA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–171 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt tolerance was positively correlated with shoot accumulation of sodium and chloride.

Compound
sodium and chloridee0
Outcome
salt tolerancee0
Direction
positivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“positive correlation between salt tolerance and accumulation of sodium and chloride in the shoots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1003 · show in text ↑
e1

“salt tolerance of sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–889 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

FIA may suit breeding for improved sugar beet salt tolerance.

Material
FIAe0
Outcome
breeding programme of sugar beet for improved salt tolerancee0
Comparator
ADAe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FIA but not ADA may be suited for a breeding programme of sugar beet for improved salt tolerance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1101 · show in text ↑

sodium chloride · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

20 papers: 10 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

sodium chloride · nutrient: content · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 1 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.