Abstract
SUMMARY A ready‐to‐fog' formulation of iprodione applied with themal foging equipment was a satisfactory alternative to high‐volume (HV) sparys of iprodione for the control ofnatural infecton with grey mould ( Botrytis cinerea ) in an unheated tomato crop. There were no significant differences in numbers of droped fruit nor in the control of naturally‐occurring lesions in stems or leaves, nor of ghost‐spotting on fruit, between the HV sprays and fogs applied every fortnight. Except for ghost‐spotting, control by fogs applied weekly was better than by eihter for nightly treatment. In contrast, the control of infection from B. cinerea inoculations on peitoles was significantly better by the fortnightly HV treatment than by either frequency of foging. Control of infection imporved with increase in the number of fungicide applications to the peitole before inoculation; two HV sprays gave complete control but six fog applications did not. The variation in the conrrol of infection by fogs and presumbly therefore in the distribution of fungicide within the 61 m 2 glasshouse compartments was small. Application of the iprodione fogging formulation significantly reduced the number of fruits see by about 5% compared with the HV treatment.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Fortnightly fogs and fortnightly high-volume sprays gave no significant difference in numbers of dropped fruit.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- fogs applied every fortnighte2
- Outcome
- numbers of droped fruite2
- Direction
- no significant differencese2
- Comparator
- HV sprayse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“There were no significant differences in numbers of droped fruit nor in the control of naturally‐occurring lesions in stems or leaves, nor of ghost‐spotting on fruit, between the HV sprays and fogs applied every fortnight”
t0“Application of iprodione by thermal fogging for the control of grey mould of tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Fortnightly fogs and fortnightly high-volume sprays gave no significant difference in control of naturally occurring stem and leaf lesions.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- fogs applied every fortnighte2
- Outcome
- control of naturally‐occurring lesions in stems or leavese2
- Direction
- no significant differencese2
- Comparator
- HV sprayse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“There were no significant differences in numbers of droped fruit nor in the control of naturally‐occurring lesions in stems or leaves, nor of ghost‐spotting on fruit, between the HV sprays and fogs applied every fortnight”
t0“Application of iprodione by thermal fogging for the control of grey mould of tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Fortnightly fogs and fortnightly high-volume sprays gave no significant difference in ghost-spotting on fruit.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- fogs applied every fortnighte2
- Outcome
- ghost‐spotting on fruite2
- Direction
- no significant differencese2
- Comparator
- HV sprayse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“There were no significant differences in numbers of droped fruit nor in the control of naturally‐occurring lesions in stems or leaves, nor of ghost‐spotting on fruit, between the HV sprays and fogs applied every fortnight”
t0“Application of iprodione by thermal fogging for the control of grey mould of tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Except for ghost-spotting, weekly fogging gave better control of grey mould than nightly fogging.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- fogs applied weeklye3
- Outcome
- controle3
- Direction
- was bettere3
- Qualifier
- Except for ghost‐spottinge3
- Comparator
- nightly treatmente3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“Except for ghost‐spotting, control by fogs applied weekly was better than by eihter for nightly treatment”
t0“Application of iprodione by thermal fogging for the control of grey mould of tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Fortnightly high-volume sprays gave significantly better control of Botrytis cinerea infection on petioles than either fogging frequency.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Organ / stage
- peitolese4
- Treatment
- fortnightly HV treatmente4
- Interactor
- B. cinerea
Botrytis cinereae4pathogen - Outcome
- control of infectione4
- Direction
- significantly bettere4
- Comparator
- either frequency of foginge4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“In contrast, the control of infection from B. cinerea inoculations on peitoles was significantly better by the fortnightly HV treatment than by either frequency of foging”
t0“Application of iprodione by thermal fogging for the control of grey mould of tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing the number of fungicide applications to petioles before inoculation improved control of infection.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Organ / stage
- peitolee5
- Treatment
- number of fungicide applicationse5
- Outcome
- Control of infectione5
- Direction
- imporvede5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“Control of infection imporved with increase in the number of fungicide applications to the peitole before inoculation”
t0“Application of iprodione by thermal fogging for the control of grey mould of tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Two high-volume sprays gave complete control of petiole infection before inoculation.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- two HV sprayse6
- Outcome
- controle6
- Direction
- gave complete controle6
- Comparator
- six fog applicationse6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e6“two HV sprays gave complete control but six fog applications did not”
t0“Application of iprodione by thermal fogging for the control of grey mould of tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Six fog applications did not give complete control of petiole infection before inoculation.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- six fog applicationse6
- Outcome
- controle6
- Direction
- did note6
- Comparator
- two HV sprayse6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e6“two HV sprays gave complete control but six fog applications did not”
t0“Application of iprodione by thermal fogging for the control of grey mould of tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Iprodione fogging significantly reduced the number of fruits seen by about 5% compared with the high-volume treatment.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- iprodione fogging formulatione7
- Outcome
- number of fruits seee7
- Direction
- significantly reducede7
- Value
- about 5%e7
- Comparator
- HV treatmente7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e7“Application of the iprodione fogging formulation significantly reduced the number of fruits see by about 5% compared with the HV treatment”
t0“Application of iprodione by thermal fogging for the control of grey mould of tomato”
The same questions in other papers
fungicide · control · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- no effect
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →application · control · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- no effect
32 papers more in this group
See all 36 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.